Open Access
Open access
том 13 издание 11 страницы e0208009

Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil

Тип публикацииJournal Article
Дата публикации2018-11-29
scimago Q1
wos Q2
white level БС1
SJR0.726
CiteScore5.4
Impact factor2.6
ISSN19326203
Multidisciplinary
Краткое описание
Extraction and quantification of nano- and microplastics from sediments and soils is challenging. Although no standard method has been established so far, flotation is commonly used to separate plastic from mineral material. The objective of this study was to test the efficiency of flotation for the extraction of nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil. We spiked biosolids and soil samples with polystyrene nano- and microbeads (0.05, 1.0, 2.6, 4.8, and 100 μm diameter). Different extraction methods (w/ and w/o H2O2 digestion) were tested, and plastic beads were separated from mineral particles by flotation in a ZnCl2 solution. Plastic particles were quantified by UV-Vis spectrometry and gravimetrically. While large beads (100 μm) could be quantitatively extracted (∼100%) from both biosolids and soils, smaller beads had low extraction efficiencies (ranging from 5 to 80%, with an average of 20%). Except for the 100 μm beads, oxidation with H2O2 negatively impacted the extraction efficiencies. For the soil, extraction with water only, followed by flotation in a ZnCl2 solution, resulted in relatively high extraction efficiencies (>75%) for beads larger than 1 μm, but low efficiencies (<30%) for the 0.05 and 1.0 μm beads. Our results indicate that while flotation generally works to separate plastic nano- and microbeads in a solution, the challenge is to quantitatively extract nano- and microbeads from a biosolids or soil matrix. Samples high in organic matter content require removal of the organic matter, but the common method of H2O2 oxidation leads to poor extraction efficiencies for nano- and microbeads.
Для доступа к списку цитирований публикации необходимо авторизоваться.
Для доступа к списку профилей, цитирующих публикацию, необходимо авторизоваться.

Топ-30

Журналы

2
4
6
8
10
12
Science of the Total Environment
11 публикаций, 13.41%
Microplastics and Nanoplastics
4 публикации, 4.88%
Environmental Pollution
3 публикации, 3.66%
Journal of Environmental Management
3 публикации, 3.66%
Water (Switzerland)
2 публикации, 2.44%
Sustainability
2 публикации, 2.44%
MethodsX
2 публикации, 2.44%
Journal of Cleaner Production
2 публикации, 2.44%
Regional Studies in Marine Science
2 публикации, 2.44%
Journal of Water Process Engineering
2 публикации, 2.44%
Water Environment Research
2 публикации, 2.44%
Environmental Science & Technology
2 публикации, 2.44%
Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology
2 публикации, 2.44%
Analytical Methods
2 публикации, 2.44%
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
2 публикации, 2.44%
SOIL
1 публикация, 1.22%
Soil Ecology Letters
1 публикация, 1.22%
Applied Spectroscopy
1 публикация, 1.22%
Agriculture (Switzerland)
1 публикация, 1.22%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 публикация, 1.22%
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
1 публикация, 1.22%
Insects
1 публикация, 1.22%
Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering
1 публикация, 1.22%
Journal of Arid Land
1 публикация, 1.22%
Journal of Soils and Sediments
1 публикация, 1.22%
Environmental Research
1 публикация, 1.22%
Chemical Engineering Journal
1 публикация, 1.22%
Chemical Reviews
1 публикация, 1.22%
Environmental Science: Nano
1 публикация, 1.22%
2
4
6
8
10
12

Издатели

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Elsevier
33 публикации, 40.24%
Springer Nature
19 публикаций, 23.17%
MDPI
8 публикаций, 9.76%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
5 публикаций, 6.1%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
3 публикации, 3.66%
Water Environment Federation
2 публикации, 2.44%
Wiley
2 публикации, 2.44%
Copernicus
1 публикация, 1.22%
SAGE
1 публикация, 1.22%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 публикация, 1.22%
Pleiades Publishing
1 публикация, 1.22%
Emerald
1 публикация, 1.22%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 публикация, 1.22%
Taylor & Francis
1 публикация, 1.22%
Oxford University Press
1 публикация, 1.22%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
  • Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
  • Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.

Вы ученый?

Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
 Войти с ORCID
Метрики
82
Поделиться
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
Цитировать
Zhan W. et al. Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil // PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 11. p. e0208009.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50) Скопировать
Zhan W., Taylor S. E., Sharma P., Flury M. Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil // PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 11. p. e0208009.
RIS |
Цитировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0208009
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009
TI - Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
T2 - PLoS ONE
AU - Zhan, Wang
AU - Taylor, Stephen E.
AU - Sharma, Prabhakar
AU - Flury, Markus
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/11/29
PB - Public Library of Science (PLoS)
SP - e0208009
IS - 11
VL - 13
PMID - 30496263
SN - 1932-6203
ER -
BibTex |
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов) Скопировать
@article{2018_Zhan,
author = {Wang Zhan and Stephen E. Taylor and Prabhakar Sharma and Markus Flury},
title = {Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
year = {2018},
volume = {13},
publisher = {Public Library of Science (PLoS)},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009},
number = {11},
pages = {e0208009},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0208009}
}
MLA
Цитировать
Zhan, Wang, et al. “Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil.” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 11, Nov. 2018, p. e0208009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009.
Ошибка в публикации?