Open Access
Open access
volume 13 issue 11 pages e0208009

Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2018-11-29
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.803
CiteScore5.4
Impact factor2.6
ISSN19326203
Multidisciplinary
Abstract
Extraction and quantification of nano- and microplastics from sediments and soils is challenging. Although no standard method has been established so far, flotation is commonly used to separate plastic from mineral material. The objective of this study was to test the efficiency of flotation for the extraction of nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil. We spiked biosolids and soil samples with polystyrene nano- and microbeads (0.05, 1.0, 2.6, 4.8, and 100 μm diameter). Different extraction methods (w/ and w/o H2O2 digestion) were tested, and plastic beads were separated from mineral particles by flotation in a ZnCl2 solution. Plastic particles were quantified by UV-Vis spectrometry and gravimetrically. While large beads (100 μm) could be quantitatively extracted (∼100%) from both biosolids and soils, smaller beads had low extraction efficiencies (ranging from 5 to 80%, with an average of 20%). Except for the 100 μm beads, oxidation with H2O2 negatively impacted the extraction efficiencies. For the soil, extraction with water only, followed by flotation in a ZnCl2 solution, resulted in relatively high extraction efficiencies (>75%) for beads larger than 1 μm, but low efficiencies (<30%) for the 0.05 and 1.0 μm beads. Our results indicate that while flotation generally works to separate plastic nano- and microbeads in a solution, the challenge is to quantitatively extract nano- and microbeads from a biosolids or soil matrix. Samples high in organic matter content require removal of the organic matter, but the common method of H2O2 oxidation leads to poor extraction efficiencies for nano- and microbeads.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
Science of the Total Environment
10 publications, 12.82%
Microplastics and Nanoplastics
4 publications, 5.13%
Environmental Pollution
3 publications, 3.85%
Journal of Environmental Management
3 publications, 3.85%
Water (Switzerland)
2 publications, 2.56%
Sustainability
2 publications, 2.56%
MethodsX
2 publications, 2.56%
Journal of Cleaner Production
2 publications, 2.56%
Regional Studies in Marine Science
2 publications, 2.56%
Journal of Water Process Engineering
2 publications, 2.56%
Water Environment Research
2 publications, 2.56%
Environmental Science & Technology
2 publications, 2.56%
Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology
2 publications, 2.56%
Analytical Methods
2 publications, 2.56%
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
2 publications, 2.56%
SOIL
1 publication, 1.28%
Soil Ecology Letters
1 publication, 1.28%
Applied Spectroscopy
1 publication, 1.28%
Agriculture (Switzerland)
1 publication, 1.28%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 1.28%
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
1 publication, 1.28%
Insects
1 publication, 1.28%
Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering
1 publication, 1.28%
Journal of Arid Land
1 publication, 1.28%
Journal of Soils and Sediments
1 publication, 1.28%
Environmental Research
1 publication, 1.28%
Chemical Engineering Journal
1 publication, 1.28%
Chemical Reviews
1 publication, 1.28%
Environmental Science: Nano
1 publication, 1.28%
2
4
6
8
10

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Elsevier
31 publications, 39.74%
Springer Nature
18 publications, 23.08%
MDPI
7 publications, 8.97%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
5 publications, 6.41%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
3 publications, 3.85%
Water Environment Federation
2 publications, 2.56%
Wiley
2 publications, 2.56%
Copernicus
1 publication, 1.28%
SAGE
1 publication, 1.28%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 1.28%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 1.28%
Emerald
1 publication, 1.28%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 1.28%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.28%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 1.28%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
78
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Zhan W. et al. Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil // PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 11. p. e0208009.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Zhan W., Taylor S. E., Sharma P., Flury M. Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil // PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 11. p. e0208009.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0208009
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009
TI - Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
T2 - PLoS ONE
AU - Zhan, Wang
AU - Taylor, Stephen E.
AU - Sharma, Prabhakar
AU - Flury, Markus
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/11/29
PB - Public Library of Science (PLoS)
SP - e0208009
IS - 11
VL - 13
PMID - 30496263
SN - 1932-6203
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2018_Zhan,
author = {Wang Zhan and Stephen E. Taylor and Prabhakar Sharma and Markus Flury},
title = {Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
year = {2018},
volume = {13},
publisher = {Public Library of Science (PLoS)},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009},
number = {11},
pages = {e0208009},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0208009}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Zhan, Wang, et al. “Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil.” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 11, Nov. 2018, p. e0208009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009.