Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, volume 61, issue 12, pages 2167-2177

Albumin determined by bromocresol green leads to erroneous results in routine evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease

Marith van Schrojenstein Lantman 1, 2, 3
Anne Els Van De Logt 4
Elma Prudon Rosmulder 3
Marloes Langelaan 1
Ayşe Y Demir 5
Steef Kurstjens 6
Armando van der Horst 6
Aldy Kuypers 7
Aram Greuter 8
Jenny E Kootstra-Ros 9
Eline Van Der Hagen 10
Marlies Oostendorp 11
Roseri De Beer 12
Christian Ramakers 13
Dirk Bakkeren 14
Fokke Lindeboom 15
Dennis van de Wijngaart 16, 17
Jack Wetzels 4
Miranda van Berkel 3
Show full list: 20 authors
2
 
SKML , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
7
 
Laboratory Maasziekenhuis Pantein , Beugen , The Netherlands
8
 
Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Tergooi Ziekenhuis , Hilversum , The Netherlands
10
 
MCA Laboratory, Queen Beatrix Hospital , Winterswijk , The Netherlands
12
 
Laboratory for Medical Diagnostics, Rivierenland Hospital , Tiel , The Netherlands
14
 
Máxima Medical Center (MMC), Department of Clinical Chemistry , Veldhoven , The Netherlands
15
 
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology , Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
16
 
Accureon BV, Department of Clinical Chemistry , Bravis Hospital , Bergen op Zoom , The Netherlands
17
 
Zorgsaam Hospital , Terneuzen , The Netherlands
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-07-04
scimago Q1
SJR1.081
CiteScore11.3
Impact factor3.8
ISSN14346621, 14374331
General Medicine
Clinical Biochemistry
Biochemistry (medical)
Abstract
Objectives

Measurement of plasma albumin is pivotal for clinical decision-making in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Routinely used methods as bromocresol green (BCG) and bromocresol purple (BCP) can suffer from aselectivity, but the impact of aselectivity on the accuracy of plasma albumin results of CKD-patients is still unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of BCG-, BCP- and JCTLM-endorsed immunological methods in patients with various stages of CKD.

Methods

We evaluated the performance of commonly used albumin methods in patients with CKD stages G1 through G5, the latter divided in two groups based on whether they received hemodialysis treatment. In total, 163 patient plasma samples were measured at 14 laboratories, on six different BCG and BCP-platforms, and four different immunological platforms. The results were compared with an ERM-DA-470k-corrected nephelometric assay. The implications on outcome is evaluated by the proportion of patient results <38 g/L for the diagnosis of protein energy wasting.

Results

Albumin results determined with BCP- and immunological methods showed the best agreement with the target value (92.7 and 86.2 %, respectively vs. 66.7 % for BCG, namely due to overestimation). The relative agreement of each method with the target value was platform-dependent, with larger variability in agreement between platforms noted for BCG and immunological methods (3.2–4.6 and 2.6–5.3 %) as opposed to BCP (0.7–1.5 %). The stage of CKD had similar effects on the variability in agreement for the three method-groups (0.6–1.8 % vs. 0.7–1.5 % vs. 0.4–1.6 %). The differences between methods cause discrepancies in clinical decision-making, as structurally fewer patients were diagnosed with protein energy wasting upon using BCG-based albumin results.

Conclusions

Our study shows that BCP is fit for the intended use to measure plasma albumin levels in CKD patients from all stages, including patients on hemodialysis. In contrast, most BCG-based platforms falsely overestimate the plasma albumin concentration.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
1
2

Publishers

1
2
1
2
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?
Profiles