Kant-Studien, volume 116, issue 1, pages 77-99

Triebfeder, Zurechenbarkeit und empirische Psychologie: C. C. E. Schmids Handlungstheorie im Ausgang von Kant

Manja Kisner 1
1
 
Radboud University Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Postbus 9103 Nijmegen The Netherlands
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-02-14
Journal: Kant-Studien
scimago Q2
SJR0.256
CiteScore0.8
Impact factor0.9
ISSN00228877, 16131134
Abstract

C. C. E. Schmid began his academic career as a Kantian and became an influential commentator on Kant’s works. In the course of his career, however, he devoted himself increasingly to the philosophical treatment of empirical topics. Schmid’s turn towards the empirical is evident in his Attempt at a Moral Philosophy and is further developed in his Empirical Psychology and Physiology, Treated Philosophically. This paper examines Schmid’s change of perspective by focusing on his concept of moral imputability. It argues that while Schmid adheres to Kant’s terminology, he interprets the terms “incentive” (Triebfeder) and “moral feeling” differently from Kant. Schmid locates the concepts of incentive and moral feeling in the realm of sensibility, which has significant implications for his concept of moral imputability. For him, the latter is no longer linked to the question of transcendental freedom.

  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?