Open Access
Open access
Open Engineering, volume 12, issue 1, pages 409-423

Review of various sulfide electrolyte types for solid-state lithium-ion batteries

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-01-01
Journal: Open Engineering
Quartile SCImago
Q4
Quartile WOS
Impact factor1.7
ISSN23915439
General Materials Science
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Civil and Structural Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Abstract

The high sulfide ion polarization is known to cause increased ionic conductivity in the solid sulfide-type electrolytes. Three groups of sulfide-based solid-state electrolytes, namely, Li-P-S, Li6PS5X (X: Cl, Br, and I), and Li x MP x S x (M: Sn, Si, and Al) were reviewed systematically from several aspects, such as conductivity, stability, and crystal structure. The advantages and disadvantages of each electrolyte were briefly considered and compared. The method of the preparation was presented with experimental and theoretical studies. The analysis that has been carried out showed that the solid electrolyte Li10GeP2S12 is superior to others with an ionic conductivity of 12 × 10−2 S cm−1. This conductivity is comparable to that of conventional liquid electrolytes. However, the availability and high price of Ge are the problems encountered. Furthermore, because sulfide-based solid electrolytes have low chemical stability in ambient humidity, their handling is restricted to inert gas environments. When solid sulfide electrolytes are hydrolyzed, structural changes occur and H2S gas is produced. The review’s objective includes presenting a complete knowledge of sulfide-solid electrolyte synthesis method, characteristics, such as conductivity, structure, and stability, as well as generating more efficient and targeted research in enhancing the performance of the chemical substance.

Top-30

Citations by journals

1
2
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
2 publications, 10%
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 5%
Solid State Sciences
1 publication, 5%
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
1 publication, 5%
Energy Technology
1 publication, 5%
ACS applied materials & interfaces
1 publication, 5%
Sustainable Energy and Fuels
1 publication, 5%
Batteries
1 publication, 5%
SAE Technical Papers
1 publication, 5%
Advanced Energy Materials
1 publication, 5%
Open Ceramics
1 publication, 5%
Results in Engineering
1 publication, 5%
IEEE Open Journal of Nanotechnology, 1, 5%
IEEE Open Journal of Nanotechnology
1 publication, 5%
Materials
1 publication, 5%
ACS Energy Letters
1 publication, 5%
Materials Chemistry Frontiers
1 publication, 5%
Inorganics
1 publication, 5%
Chemical Engineering Journal Advances
1 publication, 5%
Russian Chemical Reviews
1 publication, 5%
1
2

Citations by publishers

1
2
3
4
5
Elsevier
5 publications, 25%
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
3 publications, 15%
Wiley
2 publications, 10%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 10%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 10%
The Electrochemical Society
2 publications, 10%
Springer Nature
1 publication, 5%
SAE International
1 publication, 5%
IEEE
1 publication, 5%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 5%
1
2
3
4
5
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Suci W. G. et al. Review of various sulfide electrolyte types for solid-state lithium-ion batteries // Open Engineering. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 1. pp. 409-423.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Suci W. G., Aliwarga H. K. (., Azinuddin Y. R., Setyawati R. B., Stulasti K. N. R., PURWANTO A. Review of various sulfide electrolyte types for solid-state lithium-ion batteries // Open Engineering. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 1. pp. 409-423.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1515/eng-2022-0043
UR - https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0043
TI - Review of various sulfide electrolyte types for solid-state lithium-ion batteries
T2 - Open Engineering
AU - Suci, Windhu Griyasti
AU - Aliwarga, Harry Kasuma (kiwi)
AU - Azinuddin, Yazid Rijal
AU - Setyawati, Rosana Budi
AU - Stulasti, Khikmah Nur Rikhy
AU - PURWANTO, AGUS
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/01/01 00:00:00
PB - Walter de Gruyter
SP - 409-423
IS - 1
VL - 12
SN - 2391-5439
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2022_Suci,
author = {Windhu Griyasti Suci and Harry Kasuma (kiwi) Aliwarga and Yazid Rijal Azinuddin and Rosana Budi Setyawati and Khikmah Nur Rikhy Stulasti and AGUS PURWANTO},
title = {Review of various sulfide electrolyte types for solid-state lithium-ion batteries},
journal = {Open Engineering},
year = {2022},
volume = {12},
publisher = {Walter de Gruyter},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0043},
number = {1},
pages = {409--423},
doi = {10.1515/eng-2022-0043}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Suci, Windhu Griyasti, et al. “Review of various sulfide electrolyte types for solid-state lithium-ion batteries.” Open Engineering, vol. 12, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0043.
Found error?