Open Access
Open access
PNRPU Mechanics Bulletin, issue 4, pages 148-162

SIMULATION OF INTERIM FORGING OF DEPOSITED PRODUCTS IN ANSYS MECHANICAL APDL (IMPLICIT ANALYSIS)

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-12-15
Quartile SCImago
Q3
Quartile WOS
Impact factor
ISSN22249893, 22261869
Materials Science (miscellaneous)
Mechanics of Materials
Computational Mechanics
Abstract

The paper considers the problem of simulating the interim forging during additive manufac-turing. Wire-arc additive technologies are associated with formation of technological residual stress fields, porosity, inhomogeneous structure and anisotropy, as well as unwanted defects, such as cracks, delamination or warping of the part. Interlayer hardening via forging both com-pensates such disadvantages and improves the mechanical properties of structures. Mathemat-ical modeling is one of main methods of studying these processes. There are a lot of publica-tions on modeling the formation of fields of residual stresses and heat shrinkage deformations in products obtained using additive technologies, including the method of wire welding. The work aims at checking the adequacy of using ANSYS Mechanical APDL for numerical modeling of interim metal forming processes. In this work, the Johnson – Cook viscoplastic model from Ex-plicit Dynamics was adapted to the capabilities of ANSYS Mechanical APDL for three materials: Amg6, 12X18H10T, VT6. As a physical model in ANSYS Mechanical APDL, a multilinear iso-tropic MISO plasticity model is chosen, which, unlike the Johnson – Cook model, does not take into account the effect of strain rate on the elastic-plastic behavior of the material. The values of the material constants for the MISO model are identified. The adequacy of replacing the non-stationary statement with a quasi-static one is proved, due to a slight loss of accuracy. A three-dimensional model of bar forging for three types of materials was built and implemented, its identification and verification were carried out by comparing with the results of a full-scale exper-iment. A good agreement between the calculated data and experiment is shown. Based on the data obtained, a conclusion was made about the admissibility of using the implicit solver ANSYS Mechanical APDL for calculating the processes of interim forging of the deposited products with acceptable accuracy.

Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Smetannikov O. Yu., Trushnikov D. N., Anisimov A. SIMULATION OF INTERIM FORGING OF DEPOSITED PRODUCTS IN ANSYS MECHANICAL APDL (IMPLICIT ANALYSIS) // PNRPU Mechanics Bulletin. 2022. Vol. 4. pp. 148-162.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Smetannikov O. Yu., Trushnikov D. N., Anisimov A. SIMULATION OF INTERIM FORGING OF DEPOSITED PRODUCTS IN ANSYS MECHANICAL APDL (IMPLICIT ANALYSIS) // PNRPU Mechanics Bulletin. 2022. Vol. 4. pp. 148-162.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.15593/perm.mech/2022.4.13
UR - https://doi.org/10.15593%2Fperm.mech%2F2022.4.13
TI - SIMULATION OF INTERIM FORGING OF DEPOSITED PRODUCTS IN ANSYS MECHANICAL APDL (IMPLICIT ANALYSIS)
T2 - PNRPU Mechanics Bulletin
AU - Smetannikov, O Yu
AU - Trushnikov, D N
AU - Anisimov, A.A.
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/12/15 00:00:00
PB - Perm National Research Polytechnic University
SP - 148-162
IS - 4
SN - 2224-9893
SN - 2226-1869
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2022_Smetannikov,
author = {O Yu Smetannikov and D N Trushnikov and A.A. Anisimov},
title = {SIMULATION OF INTERIM FORGING OF DEPOSITED PRODUCTS IN ANSYS MECHANICAL APDL (IMPLICIT ANALYSIS)},
journal = {PNRPU Mechanics Bulletin},
year = {2022},
publisher = {Perm National Research Polytechnic University},
month = {dec},
url = {https://doi.org/10.15593%2Fperm.mech%2F2022.4.13},
number = {4},
pages = {148--162},
doi = {10.15593/perm.mech/2022.4.13}
}
Found error?