Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2003-01-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.305
CiteScore: 7.8
Impact factor: 4.0
ISSN: 03125963, 11791926
PubMed ID:
12739982
Pharmacology
Pharmacology (medical)
Abstract
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection; Doxil® or Caelyx®) is a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin, reducing uptake by the reticulo-endothelial system due to the attachment of polyethylene glycol polymers to a lipid anchor and stably retaining drug as a result of liposomal entrapment via an ammonium sulfate chemical gradient. These features result in a pharmacokinetic profile characterised by an extended circulation time and a reduced volume of distribution, thereby promoting tumour uptake. Preclinical studies demonstrated one- or two-phase plasma concentration-time profiles. Most of the drug is cleared with an elimination half-life of 20–30 hours. The volume of distribution is close to the blood volume, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is increased at least 60-fold compared with free doxorubicin. Studies of tissue distribution indicated preferential accumulation into various implanted tumours and human tumour xenografts, with an enhancement of drug concentrations in the tumour when compared with free drug. Clinical studies of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in humans have included patients with AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma (ARKS) and with a variety of solid tumours, including ovarian, breast and prostate carcinomas. The pharmacokinetic profile in humans at doses between 10 and 80 mg/m2 is similar to that in animals, with one or two distribution phases: an initial phase with a half-life of 1–3 hours and a second phase with a half-life of 30–90 hours. The AUC after a dose of 50 mg/m2 is approximately 300-fold greater than that with free drug. Clearance and volume of distribution are drastically reduced (at least 250-fold and 60-fold, respectively). Preliminary observations indicate that utilising the distinct pharmacokinetic parameters of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in dose scheduling is an attractive possibility. In agreement with the preclinical findings, the ability of pegylated liposomes to extravasate through the leaky vasculature of tumours, as well as their extended circulation time, results in enhanced delivery of liposomal drug and/or radiotracers to the tumour site in cancer patients. There is evidence of selective tumour uptake in malignant effusions, ARKS skin lesions and a variety of solid tumours. The toxicity profile of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is characterised by dose-limiting mucosal and cutaneous toxicities, mild myelosuppression, decreased cardiotoxicity compared with free doxorubicin and minimal alopecia. The mucocutaneous toxicities are dose-limiting per injection; however, the reduced cardiotoxicity allows a larger cumulative dose than that acceptable for free doxorubicin. Thus, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin represents a new class of chemotherapy delivery system that may significantly improve the therapeutic index of doxorubicin.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
|
Journal of Controlled Release
79 publications, 5.78%
|
|
|
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
33 publications, 2.41%
|
|
|
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
31 publications, 2.27%
|
|
|
Pharmaceutics
28 publications, 2.05%
|
|
|
Molecular Pharmaceutics
26 publications, 1.9%
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical Research
24 publications, 1.76%
|
|
|
Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine
21 publications, 1.54%
|
|
|
Nanomedicine
19 publications, 1.39%
|
|
|
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
19 publications, 1.39%
|
|
|
ACS Nano
18 publications, 1.32%
|
|
|
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
15 publications, 1.1%
|
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
14 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
Bioconjugate Chemistry
13 publications, 0.95%
|
|
|
Journal of Drug Targeting
13 publications, 0.95%
|
|
|
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
12 publications, 0.88%
|
|
|
Biomaterials
12 publications, 0.88%
|
|
|
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
12 publications, 0.88%
|
|
|
Small
12 publications, 0.88%
|
|
|
Nanoscale
12 publications, 0.88%
|
|
|
Nature Communications
10 publications, 0.73%
|
|
|
Langmuir
10 publications, 0.73%
|
|
|
Journal of Liposome Research
10 publications, 0.73%
|
|
|
Advanced Materials
9 publications, 0.66%
|
|
|
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
9 publications, 0.66%
|
|
|
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
8 publications, 0.59%
|
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
8 publications, 0.59%
|
|
|
Clinical Cancer Research
8 publications, 0.59%
|
|
|
AAPS PharmSciTech
7 publications, 0.51%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
7 publications, 0.51%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Publishers
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
|
Elsevier
448 publications, 32.77%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
190 publications, 13.9%
|
|
|
Wiley
118 publications, 8.63%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
111 publications, 8.12%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
109 publications, 7.97%
|
|
|
MDPI
86 publications, 6.29%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
52 publications, 3.8%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
18 publications, 1.32%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
17 publications, 1.24%
|
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
15 publications, 1.1%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
14 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
11 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
11 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
8 publications, 0.59%
|
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
7 publications, 0.51%
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
7 publications, 0.51%
|
|
|
SAGE
7 publications, 0.51%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
6 publications, 0.44%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
6 publications, 0.44%
|
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
|
ASME International
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
|
S. Karger AG
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
|
Spandidos Publications
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
|
Impact Journals
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1.4k
Total citations:
1368
Citations from 2024:
171
(12.51%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Gabizon A. et al. Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin // Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2003. Vol. 42. No. 5. pp. 419-436.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Gabizon A., Shmeeda H., Barenholz Y. Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin // Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2003. Vol. 42. No. 5. pp. 419-436.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002
UR - https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002
TI - Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin
T2 - Clinical Pharmacokinetics
AU - Gabizon, Alberto
AU - Shmeeda, Hilary
AU - Barenholz, Yechezkel
PY - 2003
DA - 2003/01/01
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 419-436
IS - 5
VL - 42
PMID - 12739982
SN - 0312-5963
SN - 1179-1926
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2003_Gabizon,
author = {Alberto Gabizon and Hilary Shmeeda and Yechezkel Barenholz},
title = {Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin},
journal = {Clinical Pharmacokinetics},
year = {2003},
volume = {42},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002},
number = {5},
pages = {419--436},
doi = {10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Gabizon, Alberto, et al. “Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.” Clinical Pharmacokinetics, vol. 42, no. 5, Jan. 2003, pp. 419-436. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002.