American Journal of Roentgenology, volume 199, issue 5, pages 1153-1163

Complication Rates and Effectiveness of Uterine Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Symptomatic Leiomyomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2012-10-24
scimago Q1
SJR1.235
CiteScore12.8
Impact factor4.7
ISSN0361803X, 15463141
PubMed ID:  23096193
General Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Abstract
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the rates of major complications, other associated adverse events, reintervention, and clinical improvement from studies reporting complications of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of symptomatic leiomyomas.PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for publications on the treatment of leiomyomas by UAE. Data pertaining to study characteristics, numbers of complications, symptomatic improvement, and reinterventions were collected by two readers. Pooled event rates were calculated using a random effects method.Fifty-four study populations met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 8159 patients. There were no reported deaths. Major complications occurred at a rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 2.2-3.8%). The rate of hysterectomy for resolution of a complication from UAE was 0.7% (0.5-0.9%), and the rate of readmission was 2.7% (1.9-3.7%). Multiple other specific complications were recorded including leiomyoma tissue passage (4.7% [3.9-5.7%]), deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (0.2% [0.2-0.4%]), and permanent amenorrhea (3.9% [2.7-5.3%]). Reintervention rates including repeat UAE, myomectomy, or hysterectomy calculated per patient-year occurred at 5.3% (4.2-6.4%) with follow-up ranging from 0.25 to 5 years. Clinical symptomatic improvement ranged from 78% to 90%, with follow-up ranging from 0.25 to 2 years.Symptomatic uterine leiomyoma treatment by UAE is an effective procedure with a low rate of major complications supporting its use as an alternative to hysterectomy.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?