Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic
Denis Tack
1
,
Stavroula Sourtzis
1
,
Isabelle Delpierre
1
,
VIVIANE DE MAERTELAER
2
,
Pierre-Alain Gevenois
3
1
Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Hôpital Civil de Charleroi, 92 blvd. Janson, B-6000-Charleroi, Belgium.
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2013-02-28
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.469
CiteScore: 9.5
Impact factor: 6.1
ISSN: 0361803X, 15463141
PubMed ID:
12540420
General Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Abstract
This study is designed to assess the intraobserver and interobserver agreements and the diagnostic performances of low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) in patients with suspected renal colic.The study included 106 patients who underwent unenhanced MDCT with 4 x 2.5 mm collimation, 120 kVp, 30 mAs, and, if necessary, additional focused acquisitions at 60 or 120 mAs on areas with an equivocal ureteral stone or with significant image noise. The effective radiation dose was computer-simulated with software based on the Monte Carlo model and International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. CT scans were archived and independently reviewed by three radiologists during two interpretation sessions on a workstation with three dimensions functions. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were calculated with the kappa statistics. Accuracy for detection of ureteral stone on low-dose MDCT was calculated by comparison with combined clinical (stone passage), surgical (stone retrieval, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy), biologic (urinalysis, urine culture), and other imaging (excretory urography, standard-dose MDCT, follow-up sonography, and abdominal radiography) findings or by evidence for an alternative diagnosis.Ureteral stones were present in 38 (36%) of 106 patients. Thirty-six of 38 ureteral stones were detected by low-dose MDCT. From reviewer to reviewer, the number of true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative findings ranged, respectively, from 34 to 36, 1 to 4, 64 to 68, and 2 to 4. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 89.5% to 94.7%, from 94.1% to 100%, and from 93.4% to 98.1%, respectively. The intraobserver and interobserver agreements were excellent, with kappa values ranging from 0.87 to 0.98. In 13 patients, an alternative diagnosis explaining the patient's symptoms was proposed by all reviewers using images obtained at 30 mAs. No additional or alternative diagnosis was found at standard dose. At 30 mAs, the mean effective dose was 1.2 mSv in men and 1.9 mSv in women. Additional acquisitions at 60 mAs, all focused on the lower pelvis, were acquired in 20 patients, but the corresponding images were needed by the reviewers for only six of them. The acquisitions at 60 mAs were responsible for an additional mean effective dose of 0.5 in men and 0.8 mSv in women.Our study shows that low-dose unenhanced MDCT is appropriate for the diagnosis of ureteral stones, and that it provides excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreements and does not obscure alternative diagnoses.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
|
American Journal of Roentgenology
22 publications, 12.02%
|
|
|
Radiology
13 publications, 7.1%
|
|
|
European Radiology
12 publications, 6.56%
|
|
|
Journal of Endourology
9 publications, 4.92%
|
|
|
Imaging
6 publications, 3.28%
|
|
|
Journal of Urology
6 publications, 3.28%
|
|
|
Acta Radiologica
6 publications, 3.28%
|
|
|
European Journal of Radiology
4 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
4 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
Emergency Radiology
4 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
Medical radiology
4 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
Radiographics
3 publications, 1.64%
|
|
|
Radiologic Clinics of North America
3 publications, 1.64%
|
|
|
Abdominal Imaging
3 publications, 1.64%
|
|
|
Urology
3 publications, 1.64%
|
|
|
British Journal of Radiology
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Der Radiologe
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
World Journal of Urology
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Insights into Imaging
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Clinical Radiology
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Journal of the American College of Radiology
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
EMC - Urologie
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Progres en Urologie
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Advances in Urology
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Feuillets de Radiologie
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
|
Journal de Radiologie
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
|
Clinical Oncology
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
|
Chest
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishers
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
|
Elsevier
44 publications, 24.04%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
38 publications, 20.77%
|
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
22 publications, 12.02%
|
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
16 publications, 8.74%
|
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
9 publications, 4.92%
|
|
|
SAGE
7 publications, 3.83%
|
|
|
Wiley
7 publications, 3.83%
|
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
6 publications, 3.28%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
6 publications, 3.28%
|
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
S. Karger AG
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
International Scientific Information, Inc.
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
|
Colegio Brasileiro de Radiologia
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
|
IntechOpen
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
|
Ubiquity Press
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
183
Total citations:
183
Citations from 2024:
0
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Tack D. et al. Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic // American Journal of Roentgenology. 2013. Vol. 180. No. 2. pp. 305-311.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Tack D., Sourtzis S., Delpierre I., MAERTELAER V. D., Gevenois P. Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic // American Journal of Roentgenology. 2013. Vol. 180. No. 2. pp. 305-311.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800305
UR - https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800305
TI - Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic
T2 - American Journal of Roentgenology
AU - Tack, Denis
AU - Sourtzis, Stavroula
AU - Delpierre, Isabelle
AU - MAERTELAER, VIVIANE DE
AU - Gevenois, Pierre-Alain
PY - 2013
DA - 2013/02/28
PB - American Roentgen Ray Society
SP - 305-311
IS - 2
VL - 180
PMID - 12540420
SN - 0361-803X
SN - 1546-3141
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2013_Tack,
author = {Denis Tack and Stavroula Sourtzis and Isabelle Delpierre and VIVIANE DE MAERTELAER and Pierre-Alain Gevenois},
title = {Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic},
journal = {American Journal of Roentgenology},
year = {2013},
volume = {180},
publisher = {American Roentgen Ray Society},
month = {feb},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800305},
number = {2},
pages = {305--311},
doi = {10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800305}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Tack, Denis, et al. “Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic.” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 180, no. 2, Feb. 2013, pp. 305-311. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800305.