Improvement of Medical Student Performance in Telemedicine Standardized Patient Encounters Following an Educational Intervention
Background and Objectives: The Association of American Medical Colleges identifies telemedicine competence as an important skill for graduating medical students, but which educational methods are effective in improving student performance is unclear. We aimed to assess the impact of two educational interventions on student performance in telemedicine standardized patient encounters. Methods: Sixty second-year medical students participated in the telemedicine curriculum during their required longitudinal ambulatory clerkship. Students first completed a preintervention telemedicine standardized patient (SP) encounter in October 2020. They subsequently were assigned to two intervention groups (ie, a role-play intervention, N=30; a faculty demonstration, N=30) and completed a teaching case. In December 2020, they completed a postintervention telemedicine SP encounter. Each case was a unique clinical scenario. SPs scored the encounters across six domains based on a standardized performance checklist. We compared the median scores for these domains and the median total score pre- and postintervention (using Wilcoxon signed rank and rank-sum tests) and the difference in median score by intervention type. Results: Students scored highly in history-taking and communication performance but had low physical exam (PE) and assessment/plan scores. Postintervention, median scores in PE (ie, median score difference 2, interquartile ranges [IQR] 1-3.5, P<.001), assessment/plan (ie, median score difference 0.5, IQR 0-2, P=.005), and overall performance improved significantly (ie, median score difference 3, IQR 0-5, P<.001). Conclusions: Early medical students had low performance at baseline in telemedicine PE and assessment/plan skills, but both a role-play intervention and faculty demonstration led to significant increases in student performance.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Cureus
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Medical Education Online
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Medical Science Educator
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
BMC Medical Education
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Springer Nature
3 publications, 33.33%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Elsevier
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.