Diabetes Care, volume 46, issue 10, pages e151-e199

Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus

David B. Sacks 1
Mark Arnold 2
David E. Bruns 4
Andrea R. Horvath 5
Åke Lernmark 6
Boyd E. Metzger 7
David M. Nathan 8
M. Sue Kirkman 9
Show full list: 9 authors
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-07-20
Journal: Diabetes Care
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR5.694
CiteScore29.5
Impact factor14.8
ISSN19355548, 01495992
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Internal Medicine
Advanced and Specialized Nursing
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Numerous laboratory tests are used in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. The quality of the scientific evidence supporting the use of these assays varies substantially.

APPROACH

An expert committee compiled evidence-based recommendations for laboratory analysis in screening, diagnosis, or monitoring of diabetes. The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations were evaluated. The draft consensus recommendations were evaluated by invited reviewers and presented for public comment. Suggestions were incorporated as deemed appropriate by the authors (see Acknowledgments). The guidelines were reviewed by the Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine Committee and the Board of Directors of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and by the Professional Practice Committee of the American Diabetes Association.

CONTENT

Diabetes can be diagnosed by demonstrating increased concentrations of glucose in venous plasma or increased hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in the blood. Glycemic control is monitored by the people with diabetes measuring their own blood glucose with meters and/or with continuous interstitial glucose monitoring (CGM) devices and also by laboratory analysis of HbA1c. The potential roles of noninvasive glucose monitoring, genetic testing, and measurement of ketones, autoantibodies, urine albumin, insulin, proinsulin, and C-peptide are addressed.

SUMMARY

The guidelines provide specific recommendations based on published data or derived from expert consensus. Several analytes are found to have minimal clinical value at the present time, and measurement of them is not recommended.

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
2
4
6
8
10
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?
Profiles