volume 16 issue 2 pages 131-146

Failure factor of reinforced layer for fiber-wound composite pipe under different loads

Shunyi Chen 1, 2
Jie Zhang 1, 2
Xiaohua Chen 3
Ruinan Lin 4
2
 
Oil and Gas Equipment Technology Sharing Service Platform of Sichuan Province, , China
3
 
National Pipe Network Group Southwest Pipeline Co., Ltd., , China
4
 
Gas Management Office, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, , China
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-12-14
scimago Q4
wos Q4
SJR0.123
CiteScore0.6
Impact factor0.2
ISSN15672069, 18759262
Condensed Matter Physics
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanics of Materials
Abstract

This study examined the failure mechanism of fiber-wound composite pipe and determined the optimum winding angle. Simulation models of glass fiber-wound composite pipe were established. Failure factor of the reinforced layer of fiber-wound composite pipes under internal pressure, torsion, axial tension and bending load are investigated in conjunction with the three-dimensional Tsai-Wu failure criterion. The results show that the winding angle has a significant effect on the stress distribution of the reinforced layer. The inner layer of the reinforced layer is prone to failure under internal pressure. The outer layer of reinforcement layer under torsion is the easy failure position. The failure-prone layer under tensile load is related to the winding angle. The inner layer of the reinforced layer is prone to failure when the winding angle is less than 60°, and the outer layer is prone to failure when the winding angle is more than 60°. The outer reinforced layer is prone to failure under bending loads. When the winding angle is less than 50°, the easily failed failure position is on the inside of bending. When the winding angle is greater than 50°, the easily failed position is on the outside of bending. The smaller winding angle is conducive to improve the tensile, bending and torsion resistance of the composite pipe. The larger winding angle is beneficial for improving resistance to internal pressure. The optimal winding angle range for each load is different and multiple winding angles should be used in the design to obtain a higher overall load carrying capacity. The research results can provide a theoretical basis for the improved design, manufacture and evaluation of fiber-wound composite pipes.

Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Chen S. et al. Failure factor of reinforced layer for fiber-wound composite pipe under different loads // Strength, Fracture and Complexity. 2023. Vol. 16. No. 2. pp. 131-146.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Chen S., Zhang J., Chen X., Lin R. Failure factor of reinforced layer for fiber-wound composite pipe under different loads // Strength, Fracture and Complexity. 2023. Vol. 16. No. 2. pp. 131-146.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3233/sfc-230012
UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3233/SFC-230012
TI - Failure factor of reinforced layer for fiber-wound composite pipe under different loads
T2 - Strength, Fracture and Complexity
AU - Chen, Shunyi
AU - Zhang, Jie
AU - Chen, Xiaohua
AU - Lin, Ruinan
PY - 2023
DA - 2023/12/14
PB - SAGE
SP - 131-146
IS - 2
VL - 16
SN - 1567-2069
SN - 1875-9262
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2023_Chen,
author = {Shunyi Chen and Jie Zhang and Xiaohua Chen and Ruinan Lin},
title = {Failure factor of reinforced layer for fiber-wound composite pipe under different loads},
journal = {Strength, Fracture and Complexity},
year = {2023},
volume = {16},
publisher = {SAGE},
month = {dec},
url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3233/SFC-230012},
number = {2},
pages = {131--146},
doi = {10.3233/sfc-230012}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Chen, Shunyi, et al. “Failure factor of reinforced layer for fiber-wound composite pipe under different loads.” Strength, Fracture and Complexity, vol. 16, no. 2, Dec. 2023, pp. 131-146. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3233/SFC-230012.