Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setups
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in the early detection of various cardiac conditions from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). However, the ability of AI to identify abnormalities from single-lead recordings across a range of pathological conditions remains to be systematically investigated. This study aims to assess the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) using a single-lead (D1) rather than a standard 12-lead setup for accurate identification of ECG abnormalities.
Methods
We designed and trained a lightweight CNN to identify 20 different cardiac abnormalities on ECGs, using data from the PTB-XL dataset. With a relatively simple architecture, the network was designed to accommodate different combinations of leads as input (<100,000 learnable parameters). We compared various lead setups such as the standard 12-lead, D1 alone, and D1 paired with an additional lead.
Results
The CNN based on single-lead ECG (D1) outperformed the one based on the standard 12-lead framework [with an average percentage difference of the area under the curve (AUC) of −8.7%]. Notably, for certain diagnostic classes, there was no difference in the diagnostic AUC between the single-lead and the standard 12-lead setups. When a second lead was detected in the CNN in addition to D1, the AUC gap was further reduced to an average percentage difference of −2.8% compared with that of the standard 12-lead setup.
Conclusions
A relatively lightweight CNN can predict different classes of cardiac abnormalities from D1 alone and the standard 12-lead ECG. Considering the growing availability of wearable devices capable of recording a D1-like single-lead ECG, we discuss how our findings contribute to the foundation of a large-scale screening of cardiac abnormalities.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Bioelectronic Medicine
1 publication, 20%
|
|
|
IEEE Access
1 publication, 20%
|
|
|
Science China Materials
1 publication, 20%
|
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
1 publication, 20%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
2
|
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 40%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2 publications, 40%
|
|
|
Elsevier
1 publication, 20%
|
|
|
1
2
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.