Open Access
Open access

Non-normal Distributions Commonly Used in Health, Education, and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2017-09-14
scimago Q2
wos Q1
SJR0.872
CiteScore6.3
Impact factor2.9
ISSN16641078
General Psychology
Abstract
Statistical analysis is crucial for research and the choice of analytical technique should take into account the specific distribution of data. Although the data obtained from health, educational, and social sciences research are often not normally distributed, there are very few studies detailing which distributions are most likely to represent data in these disciplines. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the frequency of appearance of the most common non-normal distributions in the health, educational, and social sciences. The search was carried out in the Web of Science (WOS) database, from which we retrieved the abstracts of papers published between 2010 and 2015. The selection was made on the basis of the title and the abstract, and was performed independently by two reviewers. The inter-rater reliability for article selection was high (Cohen’s kappa = 0.84), and agreement regarding the type of distribution reached 96.5%. A total of 262 abstracts were included in the final review. The distribution of the response variable was reported in 231 of these abstracts, while in the remaining 31 it was merely stated that the distribution was non-normal. In terms of their frequency of appearance, the most-common non-normal distributions can be ranked in descending order as follows: gamma, negative binomial, multinomial, binomial, lognormal, and exponential. In addition to identifying the distributions most commonly used in empirical studies these results will help researchers to decide which distributions should be included in simulation studies examining statistical procedures.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Scientific Reports
5 publications, 5.05%
IEEE Access
5 publications, 5.05%
Frontiers in Psychology
4 publications, 4.04%
Behavior Research Methods
4 publications, 4.04%
Current Psychology
3 publications, 3.03%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
2 publications, 2.02%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
2 publications, 2.02%
Behavioral Sciences
2 publications, 2.02%
Heliyon
2 publications, 2.02%
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics
2 publications, 2.02%
Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation
2 publications, 2.02%
BMC Medical Research Methodology
2 publications, 2.02%
Acta Psychologica
2 publications, 2.02%
Aslib Journal of Information Management
1 publication, 1.01%
Journal of Applied Gerontology
1 publication, 1.01%
Nursing Research
1 publication, 1.01%
International Journal of Health Services
1 publication, 1.01%
Sensors
1 publication, 1.01%
Symmetry
1 publication, 1.01%
Biology
1 publication, 1.01%
Sustainability
1 publication, 1.01%
Frontiers in Neuroscience
1 publication, 1.01%
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
1 publication, 1.01%
Psychometrika
1 publication, 1.01%
Cognitive Computation
1 publication, 1.01%
Cognitive Neurodynamics
1 publication, 1.01%
BMC Geriatrics
1 publication, 1.01%
Brain Research
1 publication, 1.01%
Scientific African
1 publication, 1.01%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Springer Nature
22 publications, 22.22%
MDPI
15 publications, 15.15%
Elsevier
11 publications, 11.11%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
9 publications, 9.09%
Wiley
8 publications, 8.08%
Taylor & Francis
8 publications, 8.08%
SAGE
6 publications, 6.06%
Frontiers Media S.A.
5 publications, 5.05%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 publications, 5.05%
Emerald
3 publications, 3.03%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 publication, 1.01%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 1.01%
BMJ
1 publication, 1.01%
The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
1 publication, 1.01%
American Psychological Association (APA)
1 publication, 1.01%
PeerJ
1 publication, 1.01%
Edizioni Minerva Medica
1 publication, 1.01%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
99
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Bono R. et al. Non-normal Distributions Commonly Used in Health, Education, and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 8.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Bono R., Blanca M. J., Arnau J., Gómez-Benito J. Non-normal Distributions Commonly Used in Health, Education, and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 8.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01602
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01602
TI - Non-normal Distributions Commonly Used in Health, Education, and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review
T2 - Frontiers in Psychology
AU - Bono, Roser
AU - Blanca, María J.
AU - Arnau, Jaume
AU - Gómez-Benito, Juana
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/09/14
PB - Frontiers Media S.A.
VL - 8
PMID - 28959227
SN - 1664-1078
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2017_Bono,
author = {Roser Bono and María J. Blanca and Jaume Arnau and Juana Gómez-Benito},
title = {Non-normal Distributions Commonly Used in Health, Education, and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
year = {2017},
volume = {8},
publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01602},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01602}
}