Open Access
Open access
Diagnostics, volume 14, issue 1, pages 12

Assessment of Deep Learning Models for Cutaneous Leishmania Parasite Diagnosis Using Microscopic Images

Ali Mansour Abdelmula 1
Omid Mirzaei 2, 3
Emrah Güler 4
Kaya Süer 5
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-12-20
Journal: Diagnostics
scimago Q2
SJR0.667
CiteScore4.7
Impact factor3
ISSN20754418
Clinical Biochemistry
Abstract

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common illness that causes skin lesions, principally ulcerations, on exposed regions of the body. Although neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are typically found in tropical areas, they have recently become more common along Africa’s northern coast, particularly in Libya. The devastation of healthcare infrastructure during the 2011 war and the following conflicts, as well as governmental apathy, may be causal factors associated with this catastrophic event. The main objective of this study is to evaluate alternative diagnostic strategies for recognizing amastigotes of cutaneous leishmaniasis parasites at various stages using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). The research is additionally aimed at testing different classification models employing a dataset of ultra-thin skin smear images of Leishmania parasite-infected people with cutaneous leishmaniasis. The pre-trained deep learning models including EfficientNetB0, DenseNet201, ResNet101, MobileNetv2, and Xception are used for the cutaneous leishmania parasite diagnosis task. To assess the models’ effectiveness, we employed a five-fold cross-validation approach to guarantee the consistency of the models’ outputs when applied to different portions of the full dataset. Following a thorough assessment and contrast of the various models, DenseNet-201 proved to be the most suitable choice. It attained a mean accuracy of 0.9914 along with outstanding results for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F1-score, Matthew’s correlation coefficient, and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient. The DenseNet-201 model surpassed the other models based on a comprehensive evaluation of these key classification performance metrics.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
1

Publishers

1
2
3
1
2
3
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?