Open Access
Open access
Dentistry Journal, volume 13, issue 3, pages 117

Mechanical Performance and Surface Roughness of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramics Before and After Exposure to Acidic Challenge

Ahmed Elsherbini 1
Salma Fathy 2
Mutlu Özcan 4
1
 
Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Dentistry and Orthodontics, Tissue Engineering Division, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
2
 
Dental Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
4
 
University of Zurich, Center for Dental Medicine, Clinic for Masticatory Disorders and Dental Biomaterials, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-03-06
scimago Q2
SJR0.553
CiteScore3.7
Impact factor2.5
ISSN23046767
Abstract

Background/Objectives: Fabrication of ceramic restorations with higher performance, biocompatibility, and mechanical durability, as well as excellent optical properties, is challenging. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the mechanical properties and surface roughness of different glass ceramics manufactured with CAD/CAM and pressed techniques before and after exposure to simulated gastric acidic challenge. Methods: Lithium disilicate-based (LDS) ceramic, advanced lithium disilicate (ALDS), and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLSC), were manufactured with two techniques. Disc-shaped (N = 336) specimens were used to test the biaxial flexural strength (BFS), while surface microhardness and surface roughness were evaluated before and after exposure to hydrochloric acid (34–37% concentration and 1.2 pH for 24 h). The results were statistically evaluated using two- and one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc and Student’s t-test. Results: Both CAD and pressed types of LDS ceramic IPS e.max, showed significantly highest BFS and microhardness before and after acidic challenge (p = 0.01 and <0.01, respectively). ALDS and ZLSC showed significantly lower roughness before acidic aging, while all groups showed no significant difference after aging. Conclusion: Pressed groups showed better mechanical performance than CAD groups. LSD (IPS e.max types) continuously showed a better mechanical performance than modified LDS. ALDS and ZLSC showed the best performance in terms of surface smoothness, but after acidic exposure, no significant difference was observed compared to the other groups.

Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?