Open Access
Open access

Implementation of a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Program for Chinese Smokers

Ting Luo 1, 2
Mirandy S Li 2, 3
Donna Williams 2
Jackson Fritz 2, 3
Stephen Phillippi 2
Qingzhao Yu 4
Stephen Kantrow 3
Liwei Chen 5
Yongchun Chen 6
Kaylin Beiter 2, 3
Tung-Sung Tseng 2
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-10-25
scimago Q2
SJR0.919
CiteScore8.5
Impact factor
ISSN16617827, 16604601
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Abstract

Introduction: Although smoking prevalence has recently declined, the smoking prevalence in China remains high. Extensive research has demonstrated ways that social media can assist in quitting smoking. WeChat is the most commonly used social media platform in China but has not been used for smoking cessation. A process evaluation of a novel WeChat-based smoking cessation intervention was conducted to measure its efficacy of content delivery, participant satisfaction, engagement, and likelihood of recommendation to others. Methods: A three-week, three-arm, single-blind randomized control trial was established. WeChat was used to recruit 403 participants and to deliver intervention messages and process evaluation surveys to them. Recruitment advertisements were posted on an official WeChat account and were forwarded to WeChat Moments. Intervention messages were delivered once a day during weekdays, using the WeChat broadcasting messages function, with two messages being sent each time. Process evaluation surveys were organized using Wenjuanwang and were delivered via WeChat. Process assessments were conducted every Friday to assess intervention message receipt, satisfaction level, engagement level, and recommendation to others. The receipt of intervention messages was measured by a self-reported question indicating which messages were read each week. Satisfaction was measured by a five-item Likert scale survey. Engagement was measured by a one-item Likert scale survey. Recommendation to others was measured by one self-reported question. Results: Participants read an average of 4.76 (out of 10), 5.80 (out of 10), and 4.25 (out of 6) messages at week 1, week 2, and week 3, respectively. The second messages were less likely to be read compared to the first messages (52.3% vs. 61.6%, respectively). Moreover, within each single week, the number of participants who read the intervention messages gradually decreases over time. Picture-based intervention messages tended to be less likely to be read than video-based intervention messages. Total program satisfaction scores ranged between 5 and 25, and the overall scores for satisfaction for each week were 21.55, 22.27, and 22.76, respectively. No significant differences were found in all the satisfaction indicators between groups. More than 60% of participants reported being either highly engaged or somewhat engaged each week. In addition, most participants (93.0% at week 1, 95.8% at week 2, and 96.2% at week 3) reported that they were willing to recommend our program to others. Discussion: A WeChat-based smoking cessation intervention for Chinese smokers was implemented and evaluated. For future studies, one should consider sending messages of a higher importance as the first message of a given day. Smokers had a higher rate of reading intervention messages at the beginning part of each week, during which, relatively important messages should be prioritized. One might also consider alternating the topics and formats of the messages for a better engagement of the users in future studies.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Internet Interventions
1 publication, 20%
Frontiers in Psychiatry
1 publication, 20%
EClinicalMedicine
1 publication, 20%
Frontiers in Medicine
1 publication, 20%
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
1 publication, 20%
1

Publishers

1
2
Elsevier
2 publications, 40%
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 40%
JMIR Publications
1 publication, 20%
1
2
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
5
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Luo T. et al. Implementation of a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Program for Chinese Smokers // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. Vol. 18. No. 21. p. 11189.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Luo T., Li M. S., Williams D., Fritz J., Phillippi S., Yu Q., Kantrow S., Chen L., Chen Y., Beiter K., Tseng T. Implementation of a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Program for Chinese Smokers // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. Vol. 18. No. 21. p. 11189.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/ijerph182111189
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111189
TI - Implementation of a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Program for Chinese Smokers
T2 - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
AU - Luo, Ting
AU - Li, Mirandy S
AU - Williams, Donna
AU - Fritz, Jackson
AU - Phillippi, Stephen
AU - Yu, Qingzhao
AU - Kantrow, Stephen
AU - Chen, Liwei
AU - Chen, Yongchun
AU - Beiter, Kaylin
AU - Tseng, Tung-Sung
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/10/25
PB - MDPI
SP - 11189
IS - 21
VL - 18
PMID - 34769707
SN - 1661-7827
SN - 1660-4601
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2021_Luo,
author = {Ting Luo and Mirandy S Li and Donna Williams and Jackson Fritz and Stephen Phillippi and Qingzhao Yu and Stephen Kantrow and Liwei Chen and Yongchun Chen and Kaylin Beiter and Tung-Sung Tseng},
title = {Implementation of a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Program for Chinese Smokers},
journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
year = {2021},
volume = {18},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {oct},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111189},
number = {21},
pages = {11189},
doi = {10.3390/ijerph182111189}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Luo, Ting, et al. “Implementation of a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Program for Chinese Smokers.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 21, Oct. 2021, p. 11189. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111189.