Open Access
Open access
том 13 издание 24 страницы 7592

Methodological Variation Among Studies Evaluating Pain Processing in Tendinopathy: A Scoping Review

Тип публикацииJournal Article
Дата публикации2024-12-13
scimago Q1
wos Q1
БС1
SJR0.919
CiteScore5.2
Impact factor2.9
ISSN20770383
Краткое описание

Background/Objectives: Tendinopathy is a condition associated with pain and limited function. While upper and lower extremity tendinopathies may have different functional implications, there have been a number of reports supporting different patterns of dysfunction in pain processing and inhibition. The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the methods across studies examining pain processing in patients with upper and lower extremity tendinopathy. Methods: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus) and gray literature sources were searched from inception through 15 April 2024, using appropriate keywords and relevant synonyms. Results: In total, 3219 titles were retrieved from the searches, with 43 studies retained for final inclusion. Of the 43 studies, 22 were specific to upper extremity tendinopathies, 19 were specific to lower extremity tendinopathies, and 2 studies included mixed samples. Physical testing to detect nervous system sensitization was most commonly performed using pressure pain thresholds. Although infrequent, questionnaire instruments were used mostly to include the central sensitization inventory. Substantial variation was noted across studies in mode of testing and instruments used, while patient demographics and inclusion criteria were not clearly reported in many instances. Thirty-one studies (72%) reported nervous system sensitization or dysfunction in tendinopathy, while 13 (28%) did not. Conclusions: While the difference between pain processing in tendinopathy is likely multifactorial, the results of this review identified substantial variability in methodology used and reporting in tendon pain research. As inconsistency in evidence can limit clinical guidance, efforts to standardize tendinopathy pain research appear warranted.

Найдено 

Вы ученый?

Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
Метрики
0
Поделиться
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
Цитировать
Jayaseelan D. J. et al. Methodological Variation Among Studies Evaluating Pain Processing in Tendinopathy: A Scoping Review // Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024. Vol. 13. No. 24. p. 7592.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50) Скопировать
Jayaseelan D. J., Post A. A., Sault J., Mischke J. Methodological Variation Among Studies Evaluating Pain Processing in Tendinopathy: A Scoping Review // Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024. Vol. 13. No. 24. p. 7592.
RIS |
Цитировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/jcm13247592
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/24/7592
TI - Methodological Variation Among Studies Evaluating Pain Processing in Tendinopathy: A Scoping Review
T2 - Journal of Clinical Medicine
AU - Jayaseelan, Dhinu J.
AU - Post, Andrew A
AU - Sault, Josiah
AU - Mischke, John
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/12/13
PB - MDPI
SP - 7592
IS - 24
VL - 13
PMID - 39768515
SN - 2077-0383
ER -
BibTex |
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов) Скопировать
@article{2024_Jayaseelan,
author = {Dhinu J. Jayaseelan and Andrew A Post and Josiah Sault and John Mischke},
title = {Methodological Variation Among Studies Evaluating Pain Processing in Tendinopathy: A Scoping Review},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2024},
volume = {13},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {dec},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/24/7592},
number = {24},
pages = {7592},
doi = {10.3390/jcm13247592}
}
MLA
Цитировать
Jayaseelan, Dhinu J., et al. “Methodological Variation Among Studies Evaluating Pain Processing in Tendinopathy: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 13, no. 24, Dec. 2024, p. 7592. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/24/7592.