Open Access
Open access
Journal of Clinical Medicine, volume 14, issue 5, pages 1695

Efficacy of Upadacitinib Induction Treatment in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis Including Intestinal Ultrasound Assessment: A Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study

Magdalena Kaniewska 1
Konrad Lewandowski 1
Michał Krogulecki 2
Aleksandra Filipiuk 2
Maciej Gonciarz 2
Maria Janiak 4
Krystian Adrych 4
Agnieszka Klufczynska 5
Grażyna Piotrowicz 5
Maria Kopertowska-Majchrzak 6
Lech Panasiuk 7, 8
Piotr Eder 9
Agnieszka Tarasiuk 10
Mariusz Rosołowski 10, 11
Renata Talar-Wojnarowska 12
Ewa Malecka-Panas 12
Ariel Liebert 13
Maria K??opocka 13
Ewa Walecka-Kapica 14
Anita Gąsiorowska 14
Beata Galińska 15
Konrad Leśniakowski 15
Malgorzata Zwolinska-Wcislo 16
Anna Naumowicz 17
Jaroslaw Daniluk 17
Grażyna Rydzewska 1, 18
Show full list: 28 authors
1
 
Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Inferior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
2
 
Department of Gastroenterology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland
3
 
II Gastroenterology Department, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 00-416 Warsaw, Poland
5
 
Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland
6
 
Department of Internal Diseases, General Hospital, 64-400 Miedzychod, Poland
7
 
Department of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, Provincial Welded Hospital in Bialystok, 15-950 Bialystok, Poland
15
 
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, J. Gromkowski Provincial Hospital, 51-149 Wroclaw, Poland
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-03-03
scimago Q1
SJR0.882
CiteScore5.7
Impact factor3
ISSN20770383
Abstract

Background: Upadacitinib (UPA) is a new oral selective Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor that has shown high efficacy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We present data from a multicenter real-world study. Methods: To assess efficacy of UPA, Total Mayo Score (TMS), fecal calprotectin (FC), endoscopy, and intestinal ultrasonography (IUS) were performed. Results: The study population included 76 patients. An amount of 26.3% of the patients were biologics and small molecules-naive, while 73.7% were exposed. By Week 8, 93.4% of the patients had achieved a clinical response (94.7% naive vs. 92.9% exposed), 72.4% achieved endoscopic improvement (78.9% vs. 71.4%), and 57.9% had clinical remission (78.9% vs. 51.8%). Endoscopic remission was achieved in 31.6% of patients (35.0% vs. 30.4%) and biochemical remission in 82.1% (53.3% vs. 68.3%). All of the results were not significantly different apart from the steroid-free clinical remission—36.8% (68% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.002) after 8 weeks of follow-up. IUS was performed in 33 patients. Bowel wall thickness (BWT), inflammatory fat (iFAT), color Doppler signal (CDS), loss of bowel wall stratification (BWS), and Milano Ultrasound Criteria (MUC) had decreased significantly by Weeks 4 and 8 (p < 0.005 for all). Correlation between the IUS results and TMS, FC and endoscopic remission in Week 8 was confirmed (p < 0.001). UPA was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were registered in our group. Conclusions: In this study, UPA was confirmed to be safe and highly effective in inducing remission in UC patients in both the naive group and the biologically exposed patients. The correlation between the IUS results and TMS, FC, and endoscopic remission provides valuable information for clinicians.

Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?