Open Access
Open access
Materials, volume 12, issue 19, pages 3239

Fatigue Assessment Strategy Using Bayesian Techniques

Enrique Castillo 1, 2
Miguel Muniz-Calvente 3
Alfonso Fernández-Canteli 3
Sergio Blasón 3
1
 
Royal Academy of Engineering, Don Pedro 10, 28005 Madrid, Spain
2
 
Royal Academy of Sciences, Valverde 22, 28004 Madrid, Spain
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-10-03
Journal: Materials
scimago Q2
SJR0.565
CiteScore5.8
Impact factor3.1
ISSN19961944
PubMed ID:  31623343
General Materials Science
Abstract

Different empirical models have been proposed in the literature to determine the fatigue strength as a function of lifetime, according to linear, parabolic, hyperbolic, exponential, and other shaped solutions. However, most of them imply a deterministic definition of the S-N field, despite the inherent scatter exhibited by the fatigue results issuing from experimental campaigns. In this work, the Bayesian theory is presented as a suitable way not only to convert deterministic into probabilistic models, but to enhance probabilistic fatigue models with the statistical distribution of the percentile curves of failure probability interpreted as their confidence bands. After a short introduction about the application of the Bayesian methodology, its advantageous implementation on an OpenSource software named OpenBUGS is presented. As a practical example, this methodology has been applied to the statistical analysis of the Maennig fatigue S-N field data using the Weibull regression model proposed by Castillo and Canteli, which allows the confidence bands of the S-N field to be determined as a function of the already available test results. Finally, a question of general interest is discussed as that concerned to the recommendable number of tests to carry out in an experimental S-N fatigue program for achieving “reliable or confident” results to be subsequently used in component design, which, generally, is not adequately and practically addressed by researchers.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?