Open Access
Open access
Nutrients, volume 17, issue 6, pages 1051

Characterization of Beverage Viscosity Based on the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative and Its Correspondence to the Japanese Dysphagia Diet 2021

Mari Nakao Kato 1, 2
Aya Takahashi 1
Jin Magara 3
1
 
Division of Health and Nutrition, Department of Home Economics, Tohoku Seikatsu Bunka University, 1-18-2, Nijinooka, Izumi-ku, Sendai 981-8585, Miyagi-ken, Japan
2
 
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1, Seiryomachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Miyagi-ken, Japan
3
 
Division of Dysphagia Rehabilitation, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2bancho-5274 Gakkocho-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8514, Niigata-ken, Japan
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-03-17
Journal: Nutrients
scimago Q1
SJR1.301
CiteScore9.2
Impact factor4.8
ISSN20726643
Abstract

Background/Objective: The International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) and the Japanese Dysphagia Diet 2021 (JDD2021) are prominent systems that classify thickened beverages for dysphagia management. We herein aim to establish a correspondence between these systems through systematic viscosity measurements. Methods: We analyzed 49 thickened beverage samples using an E-type viscometer, IDDSI flow test, and JDD syringe test. Results: Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the following viscosity cutoffs for IDDSI levels: 0–1 at 72.0 mPa·s (area under the curve [AUC] 0.94), 1–2 at 112.0 mPa·s (AUC 0.95), and 2–3 at 303.0 mPa·s (AUC 0.97). Multiple regression analysis revealed that beverage characteristics, including fat, sodium content, and settling time, significantly influenced viscosity (R2 = 0.803). The findings established that IDDSI Level 0 corresponds to a thinner viscosity than JDD Stage 1 and Stage 1 (0–72 mPa·s), Level 1 to Stage 1 (72–112 mPa·s), Level 2 to Stages 1–2 (112–303 mPa·s), and Level 3 to Stage 3 (>303 mPa·s). Moreover, the measurement methods had high correlations (r = 0.83–0.93, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The comprehensive map between IDDSI and JDD2021 classifications developed from the results of this study enables healthcare providers to translate between the classification systems, improving dysphagia management internationally while supporting evidence-based care and global research.

Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?