Open Access
Open access
volume 2 issue 2 pages 195-201

An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Peer to Peer Surgical Teaching and the Role of the Peer Review Process

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2014-06-05
wos Q3
SJR
CiteScore
Impact factor1.8
ISSN22264787
Pharmacology (medical)
General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Oh S. et al. An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Peer to Peer Surgical Teaching and the Role of the Peer Review Process // Pharmacy. 2014. Vol. 2. No. 2. pp. 195-201.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Oh S., Lynch N., McCarthy N., Cil T., Lehane E., Reardon M., Redmond H., Corrigan M. An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Peer to Peer Surgical Teaching and the Role of the Peer Review Process // Pharmacy. 2014. Vol. 2. No. 2. pp. 195-201.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/pharmacy2020195
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy2020195
TI - An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Peer to Peer Surgical Teaching and the Role of the Peer Review Process
T2 - Pharmacy
AU - Oh, Sheila
AU - Lynch, Noel
AU - McCarthy, Nora
AU - Cil, Tulin
AU - Lehane, Elaine
AU - Reardon, Michelle
AU - Redmond, Henry
AU - Corrigan, Mark
PY - 2014
DA - 2014/06/05
PB - MDPI
SP - 195-201
IS - 2
VL - 2
SN - 2226-4787
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2014_Oh,
author = {Sheila Oh and Noel Lynch and Nora McCarthy and Tulin Cil and Elaine Lehane and Michelle Reardon and Henry Redmond and Mark Corrigan},
title = {An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Peer to Peer Surgical Teaching and the Role of the Peer Review Process},
journal = {Pharmacy},
year = {2014},
volume = {2},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy2020195},
number = {2},
pages = {195--201},
doi = {10.3390/pharmacy2020195}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Oh, Sheila, et al. “An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Peer to Peer Surgical Teaching and the Role of the Peer Review Process.” Pharmacy, vol. 2, no. 2, Jun. 2014, pp. 195-201. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy2020195.