Open Access
Open access
volume 14 issue 19 pages 3958

Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed PLA, PEEK and PETG: Adhesion of Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Lavage Cells

Stanislav Y Shilov 1
Yulia A Rozhkova 2
Lubov N Markova 3
Vadim V. Silberschmidt 5
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-09-22
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR0.918
CiteScore9.7
Impact factor4.9
ISSN20734360
General Chemistry
Polymers and Plastics
Abstract

Samples in the form of cylindrical plates, additively manufactured using the fused deposition modelling (or filament freeform fabrication, FDM/FFF) technology from polylactide (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK), were studied in series of in-vitro experiments on the adhesion of rat bone-marrow cells and rat peritoneal cells. Methods of estimation of the absolute number of cells and polymer samples’ mass change were used for the evaluation of cells adhesion, followed by the evaluation of cell-culture supernatants. The results of experiments for both types of cells demonstrated a statistically significant change in the absolute number of cells (variation from 44 to 119%) and the weight of the polymer samples (variation from 0.61 to 2.18%), depending on roughness of sample surface, controlled by a nozzle diameter of a 3D printer as well as printing layer height. It was found that more cells adhere to PLA samples with a larger nozzle diameter and layer height. For PETG samples, the results did not show a clear relationship between cell adhesion and printing parameters. For PEEK samples, on the contrary, adhesion to samples printed with a lower nozzle diameter (higher resolution) is better than to samples printed with a larger nozzle diameter (lower resolution). The difference in results for various polymers can be explained by their chemical structure.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Polymers
4 publications, 12.5%
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
3 publications, 9.38%
ACS Omega
2 publications, 6.25%
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
2 publications, 6.25%
Materials
2 publications, 6.25%
Materials Letters
1 publication, 3.13%
Biotribology
1 publication, 3.13%
Engineered Regeneration
1 publication, 3.13%
Composites Part B: Engineering
1 publication, 3.13%
Materials Today Communications
1 publication, 3.13%
Bioprinting
1 publication, 3.13%
Manure Technology and Sustainable Development
1 publication, 3.13%
Polymer
1 publication, 3.13%
Hybrid Advances
1 publication, 3.13%
Bioengineering
1 publication, 3.13%
Polymers for Advanced Technologies
1 publication, 3.13%
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1 publication, 3.13%
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
1 publication, 3.13%
Rapid Prototyping Journal
1 publication, 3.13%
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
1 publication, 3.13%
Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement Series B: Biomedical Chemistry
1 publication, 3.13%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
Elsevier
11 publications, 34.38%
MDPI
8 publications, 25%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 9.38%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 6.25%
Springer Nature
2 publications, 6.25%
Wiley
2 publications, 6.25%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 3.13%
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 3.13%
Emerald
1 publication, 3.13%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 3.13%
2
4
6
8
10
12
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
32
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Shilov S. Y. et al. Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed PLA, PEEK and PETG: Adhesion of Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Lavage Cells // Polymers. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 19. p. 3958.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Shilov S. Y., Rozhkova Y. A., Markova L. N., Tashkinov M. A., Vindokurov I. V., Silberschmidt V. V. Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed PLA, PEEK and PETG: Adhesion of Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Lavage Cells // Polymers. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 19. p. 3958.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/polym14193958
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14193958
TI - Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed PLA, PEEK and PETG: Adhesion of Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Lavage Cells
T2 - Polymers
AU - Shilov, Stanislav Y
AU - Rozhkova, Yulia A
AU - Markova, Lubov N
AU - Tashkinov, Mikhail A
AU - Vindokurov, Ilya V
AU - Silberschmidt, Vadim V.
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/09/22
PB - MDPI
SP - 3958
IS - 19
VL - 14
PMID - 36235903
SN - 2073-4360
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Shilov,
author = {Stanislav Y Shilov and Yulia A Rozhkova and Lubov N Markova and Mikhail A Tashkinov and Ilya V Vindokurov and Vadim V. Silberschmidt},
title = {Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed PLA, PEEK and PETG: Adhesion of Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Lavage Cells},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2022},
volume = {14},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14193958},
number = {19},
pages = {3958},
doi = {10.3390/polym14193958}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Shilov, Stanislav Y., et al. “Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed PLA, PEEK and PETG: Adhesion of Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Lavage Cells.” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 19, Sep. 2022, p. 3958. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14193958.