Open Access
Open access
volume 7 issue 3 pages 48

Ecological Criteria for Comparing Linear and Circular Economies

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2018-08-08
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.777
CiteScore7.2
Impact factor3.2
ISSN20799276
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Abstract

In the present article, the main principles of the circular economy are outlined in contradistinction with the existing and traditional linear economic model. An econometric model describing the influence of the linear economy on the environment is presented. The environment is characterized by seven key processes: change in global temperature; emissions of greenhouse gases from industry to the environment; emissions of greenhouse gases from agriculture to the environment; CO2 emissions into the environment; depletion of fresh water supplies; reduction of forest cover; and economic damage from climatological disasters. The model describing the impact of the traditional linear economy on the environment consists of seven interdependent econometric equations, each comprising an autoregressive distributed lag (ADL)-model. The proposed econometric model is used to analyze the environmental effects of the present linear economy. Methodological provisions for a transformational transition of the traditional linear economic model to the closed-loop systems, which also permit the impact of the closed-loop systems on the environment to be analyzed, are set out. Seven ecological indicators are proposed as criteria for comparing the traditional linear economy and the closed-loop systems. The manuscript presents a new approach for the determination of ecological criteria for comparing linear and circular economies. The results of the study could be interesting to address circular processes, which can be used as a criterion to establish ecological management according to the status of natural resources.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management
8 publications, 19.51%
Resources
7 publications, 17.07%
Sustainability
4 publications, 9.76%
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
2 publications, 4.88%
Sustainable Development
2 publications, 4.88%
Fermentation
1 publication, 2.44%
Agronomy
1 publication, 2.44%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1 publication, 2.44%
Circular Economy
1 publication, 2.44%
Environmental Technology and Innovation
1 publication, 2.44%
Procedia CIRP
1 publication, 2.44%
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
1 publication, 2.44%
Trakia Journal of Sciences
1 publication, 2.44%
Solid State Phenomena
1 publication, 2.44%
Lecture Notes in Production Engineering
1 publication, 2.44%
Scientific Notes of Taurida National V I Vernadsky University Series Economy and Management
1 publication, 2.44%
Circular Economy and Sustainability
1 publication, 2.44%
Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials
1 publication, 2.44%
Discover Sustainability
1 publication, 2.44%
Journal of Remanufacturing
1 publication, 2.44%
Journal of Industrial Ecology
1 publication, 2.44%
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
1 publication, 2.44%
Journal of Cleaner Production
1 publication, 2.44%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
MDPI
14 publications, 34.15%
Springer Nature
14 publications, 34.15%
Elsevier
4 publications, 9.76%
Wiley
4 publications, 9.76%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 4.88%
Trakia University
1 publication, 2.44%
Trans Tech Publications
1 publication, 2.44%
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
1 publication, 2.44%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
41
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Didenko N., Klochkov Y., Skripnuk D. Ecological Criteria for Comparing Linear and Circular Economies // Resources. 2018. Vol. 7. No. 3. p. 48.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Didenko N., Klochkov Y., Skripnuk D. Ecological Criteria for Comparing Linear and Circular Economies // Resources. 2018. Vol. 7. No. 3. p. 48.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/resources7030048
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7030048
TI - Ecological Criteria for Comparing Linear and Circular Economies
T2 - Resources
AU - Didenko, Nikolay
AU - Klochkov, Yuri
AU - Skripnuk, Djamilia
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/08/08
PB - MDPI
SP - 48
IS - 3
VL - 7
SN - 2079-9276
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2018_Didenko,
author = {Nikolay Didenko and Yuri Klochkov and Djamilia Skripnuk},
title = {Ecological Criteria for Comparing Linear and Circular Economies},
journal = {Resources},
year = {2018},
volume = {7},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7030048},
number = {3},
pages = {48},
doi = {10.3390/resources7030048}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Didenko, Nikolay, et al. “Ecological Criteria for Comparing Linear and Circular Economies.” Resources, vol. 7, no. 3, Aug. 2018, p. 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7030048.