Open Access
Open access
volume 17 issue 5 pages 2106

Green Innovation and the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Empirical Evidence from China

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-02-28
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.688
CiteScore7.7
Impact factor3.3
ISSN20711050
Abstract

An in-depth understanding of the impact of green innovation on the urban–rural income gap is essential for developing countries seeking to address urban–rural imbalances and promote sustainable economic development. This study focuses on China, utilizing provincial panel data from 2007 to 2022, and employs the two-way fixed effects model, the mediating effects model, and the moderating effects model. The study’s key findings are: (1) Green innovation positively reduces the urban–rural income gap. Specifically, the regression results indicate that a one-unit increase in green innovation corresponds to a 0.017-unit reduction in the urban–rural income gap. (2) The heterogeneity analysis reveals that the effect of green innovation on the urban–rural income gap is more pronounced in regions with higher levels of economic development, in non-food-producing areas, and when green utility patents are adopted. Additionally, green innovation narrows the urban–rural income gap predominantly in high-skill regions. (3) Examining the influencing mechanism confirms that green innovation reduces the urban–rural income gap by promoting population urbanization, eco-urbanization, labor force restructuring, and mitigating wage income inequality. (4) The moderating effects analysis indicates that environmental pollution exacerbates the impact of green innovation on the urban–rural income gap; specifically, higher levels of environmental pollution amplify the effect of green innovation in reducing the gap. These findings offer valuable insights for addressing urban–rural income inequality and fostering sustainable socio-economic development in developing countries.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
Sustainability
3 publications, 42.86%
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
1 publication, 14.29%
Land
1 publication, 14.29%
Energy Conversion and Management
1 publication, 14.29%
Decision Analytics Journal
1 publication, 14.29%
1
2
3

Publishers

1
2
3
4
MDPI
4 publications, 57.14%
Elsevier
2 publications, 28.57%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 14.29%
1
2
3
4
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
7
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Wen J., Chen H. Green Innovation and the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Empirical Evidence from China // Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 17. No. 5. p. 2106.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Wen J., Chen H. Green Innovation and the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Empirical Evidence from China // Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 17. No. 5. p. 2106.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/su17052106
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2106
TI - Green Innovation and the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Empirical Evidence from China
T2 - Sustainability
AU - Wen, Jinda
AU - Chen, Haonan
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/02/28
PB - MDPI
SP - 2106
IS - 5
VL - 17
SN - 2071-1050
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Wen,
author = {Jinda Wen and Haonan Chen},
title = {Green Innovation and the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Empirical Evidence from China},
journal = {Sustainability},
year = {2025},
volume = {17},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {feb},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2106},
number = {5},
pages = {2106},
doi = {10.3390/su17052106}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Wen, Jinda, and Haonan Chen. “Green Innovation and the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Empirical Evidence from China.” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 5, Feb. 2025, p. 2106. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2106.