Open Access
Open access
Water (Switzerland), volume 12, issue 1, pages 239

A Comparative Study of Kernel Logistic Regression, Radial Basis Function Classifier, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Model Tree for Flash Flood Susceptibility Mapping

Binh V. Pham 1
Phan Trinh 2
Huu Duy Nguyen 3
Chongchong Qi 4
Ata Amini 6
Lanh Si Ho 7
Tran Thi Tuyen 8
Hoang Phan Hai Yen 9
Hai-Bang Ly 1
Indra Prakash 10
Dieu Tien Bui 11
Show full list: 12 authors
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-01-15
scimago Q1
SJR0.724
CiteScore5.8
Impact factor3
ISSN20734441
Biochemistry
Water Science and Technology
Aquatic Science
Geography, Planning and Development
Abstract

Risk of flash floods is currently an important problem in many parts of Vietnam. In this study, we used four machine-learning methods, namely Kernel Logistic Regression (KLR), Radial Basis Function Classifier (RBFC), Multinomial Naïve Bayes (NBM), and Logistic Model Tree (LMT) to generate flash flood susceptibility maps at the minor part of Nghe An province of the Center region (Vietnam) where recurrent flood problems are being experienced. Performance of these four methods was evaluated to select the best method for flash flood susceptibility mapping. In the model studies, ten flash flood conditioning factors, namely soil, slope, curvature, river density, flow direction, distance from rivers, elevation, aspect, land use, and geology, were chosen based on topography and geo-environmental conditions of the site. For the validation of models, the area under Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), Area Under Curve (AUC), and various statistical indices were used. The results indicated that performance of all the models is good for generating flash flood susceptibility maps (AUC = 0.983–0.988). However, performance of LMT model is the best among the four methods (LMT: AUC = 0.988; KLR: AUC = 0.985; RBFC: AUC = 0.984; and NBM: AUC = 0.983). The present study would be useful for the construction of accurate flash flood susceptibility maps with the objectives of identifying flood-susceptible areas/zones for proper flash flood risk management.

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
5
10
15
20
25
30
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?