Open Access
Open access
Water (Switzerland), volume 13, issue 12, pages 1696

How Well Can Machine Learning Models Perform without Hydrologists? Application of Rational Feature Selection to Improve Hydrological Forecasting

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-06-19
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q2
Impact factor3.4
ISSN20734441
Biochemistry
Water Science and Technology
Aquatic Science
Geography, Planning and Development
Abstract

With more machine learning methods being involved in social and environmental research activities, we are addressing the role of available information for model training in model performance. We tested the abilities of several machine learning models for short-term hydrological forecasting by inferring linkages with all available predictors or only with those pre-selected by a hydrologist. The models used in this study were multivariate linear regression, the M5 model tree, multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network, and the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. We used two river catchments in contrasting runoff generation conditions to try to infer the ability of different model structures to automatically select the best predictor set from all those available in the dataset and compared models’ performance with that of a model operating on predictors prescribed by a hydrologist. Additionally, we tested how shuffling of the initial dataset improved model performance. We can conclude that in rainfall-driven catchments, the models performed generally better on a dataset prescribed by a hydrologist, while in mixed-snowmelt and baseflow-driven catchments, the automatic selection of predictors was preferable.

Citations by journals

1
2
3
4
Water (Switzerland)
Water (Switzerland), 4, 25%
Water (Switzerland)
4 publications, 25%
Women in the Geosciences
Women in the Geosciences, 3, 18.75%
Women in the Geosciences
3 publications, 18.75%
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing, 1, 6.25%
Remote Sensing
1 publication, 6.25%
Environmental Modelling and Software
Environmental Modelling and Software, 1, 6.25%
Environmental Modelling and Software
1 publication, 6.25%
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research, 1, 6.25%
Water Resources Research
1 publication, 6.25%
Water Resources
Water Resources, 1, 6.25%
Water Resources
1 publication, 6.25%
Frontiers in Water
Frontiers in Water, 1, 6.25%
Frontiers in Water
1 publication, 6.25%
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 1, 6.25%
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
1 publication, 6.25%
Hydrology Research
Hydrology Research, 1, 6.25%
Hydrology Research
1 publication, 6.25%
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 1, 6.25%
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
1 publication, 6.25%
1
2
3
4

Citations by publishers

1
2
3
4
5
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), 5, 31.25%
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
5 publications, 31.25%
Wiley
Wiley, 4, 25%
Wiley
4 publications, 25%
Elsevier
Elsevier, 2, 12.5%
Elsevier
2 publications, 12.5%
Pleiades Publishing
Pleiades Publishing, 1, 6.25%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 6.25%
Frontiers Media S.A.
Frontiers Media S.A., 1, 6.25%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 6.25%
Copernicus
Copernicus, 1, 6.25%
Copernicus
1 publication, 6.25%
IWA Publishing
IWA Publishing, 1, 6.25%
IWA Publishing
1 publication, 6.25%
1
2
3
4
5
  • We do not take into account publications that without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Moreido V. M. et al. How Well Can Machine Learning Models Perform without Hydrologists? Application of Rational Feature Selection to Improve Hydrological Forecasting // Water (Switzerland). 2021. Vol. 13. No. 12. p. 1696.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Moreido V. M., Gartsman B., Solomatine D. P., Suchilina Z. How Well Can Machine Learning Models Perform without Hydrologists? Application of Rational Feature Selection to Improve Hydrological Forecasting // Water (Switzerland). 2021. Vol. 13. No. 12. p. 1696.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/w13121696
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fw13121696
TI - How Well Can Machine Learning Models Perform without Hydrologists? Application of Rational Feature Selection to Improve Hydrological Forecasting
T2 - Water (Switzerland)
AU - Gartsman, Boris
AU - Suchilina, Zoya
AU - Moreido, V. M.
AU - Solomatine, D. P.
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/06/19 00:00:00
PB - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
SP - 1696
IS - 12
VL - 13
SN - 2073-4441
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2021_Moreido,
author = {Boris Gartsman and Zoya Suchilina and V. M. Moreido and D. P. Solomatine},
title = {How Well Can Machine Learning Models Perform without Hydrologists? Application of Rational Feature Selection to Improve Hydrological Forecasting},
journal = {Water (Switzerland)},
year = {2021},
volume = {13},
publisher = {Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fw13121696},
number = {12},
pages = {1696},
doi = {10.3390/w13121696}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Moreido, V. M., et al. “How Well Can Machine Learning Models Perform without Hydrologists? Application of Rational Feature Selection to Improve Hydrological Forecasting.” Water (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 12, Jun. 2021, p. 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fw13121696.
Found error?