A Deep Analysis of Brain Tumor Detection from MR Images Using Deep Learning Networks
Creating machines that behave and work in a way similar to humans is the objective of artificial intelligence (AI). In addition to pattern recognition, planning, and problem-solving, computer activities with artificial intelligence include other activities. A group of algorithms called “deep learning” is used in machine learning. With the aid of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), deep learning is utilized to create models for the detection and categorization of brain tumors. This allows for the quick and simple identification of brain tumors. Brain disorders are mostly the result of aberrant brain cell proliferation, which can harm the structure of the brain and ultimately result in malignant brain cancer. The early identification of brain tumors and the subsequent appropriate treatment may lower the death rate. In this study, we suggest a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture for the efficient identification of brain tumors using MR images. This paper also discusses various models such as ResNet-50, VGG16, and Inception V3 and conducts a comparison between the proposed architecture and these models. To analyze the performance of the models, we considered different metrics such as the accuracy, recall, loss, and area under the curve (AUC). As a result of analyzing different models with our proposed model using these metrics, we concluded that the proposed model performed better than the others. Using a dataset of 3264 MR images, we found that the CNN model had an accuracy of 93.3%, an AUC of 98.43%, a recall of 91.19%, and a loss of 0.25. We may infer that the proposed model is reliable for the early detection of a variety of brain tumors after comparing it to the other models.
Top-30
Citations by journals
1
2
3
|
|
BMC Medical Imaging
3 publications, 4.84%
|
|
Sensors
2 publications, 3.23%
|
|
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
2 publications, 3.23%
|
|
Bioengineering
2 publications, 3.23%
|
|
Symmetry
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
BioMedInformatics
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Cancers
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Mathematics
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Computation
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
PeerJ Computer Science
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Mobile Networks and Applications
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Computers in Biology and Medicine
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Medical Advancements in Aging and Regenerative Technologies
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Healthcare Analytics
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Heliyon
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Results in Engineering
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Digital
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
IEEE Access
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
1
2
3
|
Citations by publishers
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
IEEE
27 publications, 43.55%
|
|
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
11 publications, 17.74%
|
|
Springer Nature
11 publications, 17.74%
|
|
Elsevier
5 publications, 8.06%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
4 publications, 6.45%
|
|
PeerJ
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
IGI Global
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.61%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.