Open Access
Open access
volume 12 issue 3 pages 163

Effect of Graphene vs. Reduced Graphene Oxide in Gold Nanoparticles for Optical Biosensors—A Comparative Study

Ana P G Carvalho 1
Elisabete C B A Alegria 1, 2
Alessandro Fantoni 3, 4
Ana M. Ferraria 5, 6
A. M. B. Rego 5, 6
A P C Ribeiro 2
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-03-04
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR0.885
CiteScore9.8
Impact factor5.6
ISSN20796374, 0265928X
PubMed ID:  35323433
General Medicine
Clinical Biochemistry
Abstract

Aiming to develop a nanoparticle-based optical biosensor using gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized using green methods and supported by carbon-based nanomaterials, we studied the role of carbon derivatives in promoting AuNPs localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), as well as their morphology, dispersion, and stability. Carbon derivatives are expected to work as immobilization platforms for AuNPs, improving their analytical performance. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were prepared using an eco-friendly approach in a single step by reduction of HAuCl4·3H2O using phytochemicals (from tea) which act as both reducing and capping agents. UV–Vis spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), zeta potential (ζ-potential), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were used to characterize the AuNPs and nanocomposites. The addition of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) resulted in greater dispersion of AuNPs on the rGO surface compared with carbon-based nanomaterials used as a support. Differences in morphology due to the nature of the carbon support were observed and are discussed here. AuNPs/rGO seem to be the most promising candidates for the development of LSPR biosensors among the three composites we studied (AuNPs/G, AuNPs/GO, and AuNPs/rGO). Simulations based on the Mie scattering theory have been used to outline the effect of the phytochemicals on LSPR, showing that when the presence of the residuals is limited to the formation of a thin capping layer, the quality of the plasmonic resonance is not affected. A further discussion of the application framework is presented.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
ACS Applied Nano Materials
2 publications, 8%
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
1 publication, 4%
Optik
1 publication, 4%
Sensors
1 publication, 4%
ACS Omega
1 publication, 4%
Chemosphere
1 publication, 4%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
1 publication, 4%
Carbon Letters
1 publication, 4%
International Journal of Electrochemical Science
1 publication, 4%
Journal of Materials Science
1 publication, 4%
TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
1 publication, 4%
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
1 publication, 4%
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry
1 publication, 4%
2D Materials
1 publication, 4%
Applied Surface Science
1 publication, 4%
RSC Advances
1 publication, 4%
Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering
1 publication, 4%
Russian Chemical Reviews
1 publication, 4%
Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine and Biotechnology
1 publication, 4%
Industrial Crops and Products
1 publication, 4%
Analytica Chimica Acta
1 publication, 4%
1
2

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
Elsevier
11 publications, 44%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
3 publications, 12%
Springer Nature
3 publications, 12%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3 publications, 12%
MDPI
1 publication, 4%
The Electrochemical Society
1 publication, 4%
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 4%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 4%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 4%
2
4
6
8
10
12
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
25
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Carvalho A. P. G. et al. Effect of Graphene vs. Reduced Graphene Oxide in Gold Nanoparticles for Optical Biosensors—A Comparative Study // Biosensors. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 3. p. 163.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Carvalho A. P. G., Alegria E. C. B. A., Fantoni A., Ferraria A. M., Rego A. M. B., Ribeiro A. P. C. Effect of Graphene vs. Reduced Graphene Oxide in Gold Nanoparticles for Optical Biosensors—A Comparative Study // Biosensors. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 3. p. 163.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/bios12030163
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12030163
TI - Effect of Graphene vs. Reduced Graphene Oxide in Gold Nanoparticles for Optical Biosensors—A Comparative Study
T2 - Biosensors
AU - Carvalho, Ana P G
AU - Alegria, Elisabete C B A
AU - Fantoni, Alessandro
AU - Ferraria, Ana M.
AU - Rego, A. M. B.
AU - Ribeiro, A P C
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/03/04
PB - MDPI
SP - 163
IS - 3
VL - 12
PMID - 35323433
SN - 2079-6374
SN - 0265-928X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Carvalho,
author = {Ana P G Carvalho and Elisabete C B A Alegria and Alessandro Fantoni and Ana M. Ferraria and A. M. B. Rego and A P C Ribeiro},
title = {Effect of Graphene vs. Reduced Graphene Oxide in Gold Nanoparticles for Optical Biosensors—A Comparative Study},
journal = {Biosensors},
year = {2022},
volume = {12},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12030163},
number = {3},
pages = {163},
doi = {10.3390/bios12030163}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Carvalho, Ana P. G., et al. “Effect of Graphene vs. Reduced Graphene Oxide in Gold Nanoparticles for Optical Biosensors—A Comparative Study.” Biosensors, vol. 12, no. 3, Mar. 2022, p. 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12030163.