Development of sensitive droplet digital PCR assays for detecting urinary TERT promoter mutations as non-invasive biomarkers for detection of urothelial cancer
Somatic mutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter regions are frequent events in urothelial cancer (UC) and their detection in urine (supernatant cell-free DNA or DNA from exfoliated cells) could serve as putative non-invasive biomarkers for UC detection and monitoring. However, detecting these tumor-borne mutations in urine requires highly sensitive methods, capable of measuring low-level mutations. In this study, we developed sensitive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays for detecting TERT promoter mutations (C228T, C228A, CC242-243TT, and C250T). We tested the C228T and C250T ddPCR assays on all samples with sufficient quantity of urinary DNA (urine supernatant cell-free DNA (US cfDNA) or urine pellet cellular DNA (UP cellDNA)) from the DIAGURO (n = 89/93 cases and n = 92/94 controls) and from the IPO-PORTO (n = 49/50 cases and n = 50/50 controls) series that were previously screened with the UroMuTERT assay and compared the performance of the two approaches. In the DIAGURO series, the sensitivity and specificity of the ddPCR assays for detecting UC using either US cfDNA or UP cellDNA were 86.8% and 92.4%. The sensitivity was slightly higher than that of the UroMuTERT assay in the IPO-PORTO series (67.4% vs. 65.3%, respectively), but not in the DIAGURO series (86.8% vs. 90.7%). The specificity was 100% in the IPO-PORTO controls for both the UroMuTERT and ddPCR assays, whereas in the DIAGURO series, the specificity dropped for ddPCR (92.4% versus 95.6%). Overall, an almost perfect agreement between the two methods was observed for both US cfDNA (n = 164; kappa coefficient of 0.91) and UP cellDNA (n = 280; kappa coefficient of 0.94). In a large independent series of serial urine samples from DIAGURO follow-up BC cases (n = 394), the agreement between ddPCR and UroMuTERT was (i) strong (kappa coefficient of 0.87), regardless of urine DNA types (kappa coefficient 0.89 for US cfDNA and 0.85 for UP cellDNA), (ii) the highest for samples with mutant allelic fractions (MAFs) > 2% (kappa coefficient of 0.99) and (iii) only minimal for the samples with the lowest MAFs (< 0.5%; kappa coefficient 0.32). Altogether, our results indicate that the two methods (ddPCR and UroMuTERT) for detecting urinary TERT promoter mutations are comparable and that the discrepancies relate to the detection of low-allelic fraction mutations. The simplicity of the ddPCR assays makes them suitable for implementation in clinical settings.
Citations by journals
1
2
3
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
3 publications, 11.54%
|
Biomedicines
|
Biomedicines
2 publications, 7.69%
|
Molecular and Clinical Oncology
|
Molecular and Clinical Oncology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Moscow University Chemistry Bulletin
|
Moscow University Chemistry Bulletin
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Frontiers in Immunology
|
Frontiers in Immunology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy
|
Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Nature Reviews Urology
|
Nature Reviews Urology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
|
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Human Pathology
|
Human Pathology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
|
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X
|
Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X
1 publication, 3.85%
|
ChemMedChem
|
ChemMedChem
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Diagnostic Cytopathology
|
Diagnostic Cytopathology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
|
Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Journal of Oncology
|
Journal of Oncology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Journal of Immunology Research
|
Journal of Immunology Research
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Clinical Cancer Research
|
Clinical Cancer Research
1 publication, 3.85%
|
International Journal of Urology
|
International Journal of Urology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Human Molecular Genetics
|
Human Molecular Genetics
1 publication, 3.85%
|
1
2
3
|
Citations by publishers
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
|
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
7 publications, 26.92%
|
Elsevier
|
Elsevier
4 publications, 15.38%
|
Springer Nature
|
Springer Nature
3 publications, 11.54%
|
Wiley
|
Wiley
3 publications, 11.54%
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 7.69%
|
Hindawi Limited
|
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 7.69%
|
Spandidos Publications
|
Spandidos Publications
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Pleiades Publishing
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Thieme
|
Thieme
1 publication, 3.85%
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
1 publication, 3.85%
|
Oxford University Press
|
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 3.85%
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
- We do not take into account publications that without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.