Open Access
Open access
volume 14 issue 5 pages 1023

3D Printed and Conventional Membranes—A Review

Baye Gueye Thiam 1
Anouar El Magri 1
Hamid Reza Vanaei 2
Sébastien Vaudreuil 1
1
 
Euromed Research Center, Euromed Polytechnic School, Euromed University of Fes, Route de Meknès (Rond point Bensouda), Fez 30000, Morocco
2
 
Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, CNAM, LIFSE, HESAM University, 75013 Paris, France
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-03-03
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR0.918
CiteScore9.7
Impact factor4.9
ISSN20734360
General Chemistry
Polymers and Plastics
Abstract

Polymer membranes are central to the proper operation of several processes used in a wide range of applications. The production of these membranes relies on processes such as phase inversion, stretching, track etching, sintering, or electrospinning. A novel and competitive strategy in membrane production is the use of additive manufacturing that enables the easier manufacture of tailored membranes. To achieve the future development of better membranes, it is necessary to compare this novel production process to that of more conventional techniques, and clarify the advantages and disadvantages. This review article compares a conventional method of manufacturing polymer membranes to additive manufacturing. A review of 3D printed membranes is also done to give researchers a reference guide. Membranes from these two approaches were compared in terms of cost, materials, structures, properties, performance. and environmental impact. Results show that very few membrane materials are used as 3D-printed membranes. Such membranes showed acceptable performance, better structures, and less environmental impact compared with those of conventional membranes.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
Polymers
12 publications, 19.35%
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
3 publications, 4.84%
Materials
2 publications, 3.23%
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
2 publications, 3.23%
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
2 publications, 3.23%
Materials and Design
1 publication, 1.61%
Polymer Testing
1 publication, 1.61%
Carbohydrate Polymers
1 publication, 1.61%
Lab on a Chip
1 publication, 1.61%
European Polymer Journal
1 publication, 1.61%
Desalination
1 publication, 1.61%
Materials Today: Proceedings
1 publication, 1.61%
Bioengineered
1 publication, 1.61%
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
1 publication, 1.61%
Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics
1 publication, 1.61%
Materials Today Sustainability
1 publication, 1.61%
Nature Communications
1 publication, 1.61%
JACS Au
1 publication, 1.61%
Energy Storage
1 publication, 1.61%
Journal of Physics Energy
1 publication, 1.61%
Polymer
1 publication, 1.61%
IEEE Sensors Journal
1 publication, 1.61%
Solid State Ionics
1 publication, 1.61%
Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.61%
Processes
1 publication, 1.61%
Nanomanufacturing
1 publication, 1.61%
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
1 publication, 1.61%
Green Approaches in Sustainable Aviation
1 publication, 1.61%
Chemical Engineering Journal
1 publication, 1.61%
2
4
6
8
10
12

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Elsevier
17 publications, 27.42%
MDPI
16 publications, 25.81%
Springer Nature
9 publications, 14.52%
Wiley
6 publications, 9.68%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 3.23%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 3.23%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.61%
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 1.61%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 1.61%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 1.61%
SAGE
1 publication, 1.61%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 1.61%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 1.61%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 1.61%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 1.61%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
62
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Thiam B. G. et al. 3D Printed and Conventional Membranes—A Review // Polymers. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 5. p. 1023.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Thiam B. G., Magri A. E., Vanaei H. R., Vaudreuil S. 3D Printed and Conventional Membranes—A Review // Polymers. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 5. p. 1023.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/polym14051023
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051023
TI - 3D Printed and Conventional Membranes—A Review
T2 - Polymers
AU - Thiam, Baye Gueye
AU - Magri, Anouar El
AU - Vanaei, Hamid Reza
AU - Vaudreuil, Sébastien
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/03/03
PB - MDPI
SP - 1023
IS - 5
VL - 14
PMID - 35267846
SN - 2073-4360
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Thiam,
author = {Baye Gueye Thiam and Anouar El Magri and Hamid Reza Vanaei and Sébastien Vaudreuil},
title = {3D Printed and Conventional Membranes—A Review},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2022},
volume = {14},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051023},
number = {5},
pages = {1023},
doi = {10.3390/polym14051023}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Thiam, Baye Gueye, et al. “3D Printed and Conventional Membranes—A Review.” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 5, Mar. 2022, p. 1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051023.