Open Access
Open access
volume 7 issue 2 pages 582-594

Finite Element Analysis versus Empirical Modal Analysis of a Basketball Rim and Backboard

Daniel Winarski 1
Kip P. Nygren 2
Tyson Winarski 3
1
 
Independent Researcher, Tucson, AZ 85710, USA
2
 
Independent Researcher, Wilmington, NC 28405, USA
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-06-07
scimago Q2
wos Q3
SJR0.393
CiteScore3.4
Impact factor1.6
ISSN2571631X
Abstract

The first goal of this research was to document the process of using the MODAL analysis system of the ANSYS 2024R1 student edition to create a finite element model of the modes and frequencies of vibration of one basketball rim and backboard design. This finite element model included the use of steel for the rim and its mount, a tempered glass backboard, and an aluminum frame behind the backboard. After a mesh was created, fixed support boundary conditions were applied to the four corners of the aluminum frame, followed by the theoretical modal analysis. The second goal was to validate this model by comparing the finite element calculated mode shapes and frequencies to the empirical modal analysis previously measured at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. Five mode shapes and frequencies agreed rather well between the theoretical finite element analysis and previously published empirical modal analysis, specifically where the rim was vibrating in the vertical direction, which was the direction that the accelerometer was aligned for the empirical modal analysis. These five modes were addressed from a finite element model validation standpoint by a 99.5% confidence in a 98.09% cross-correlation with empirical modal analysis data, and from a verification standpoint by employing a refined-mesh. However, three theoretical mode shapes missed by the empirical modal analysis were found where the vibration of the rim was confined to the horizontal plane, which was orthogonal to the orientation of our accelerometer.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Vibration
1 publication, 100%
1

Publishers

1
MDPI
1 publication, 100%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Winarski D., Nygren K. P., Winarski T. Finite Element Analysis versus Empirical Modal Analysis of a Basketball Rim and Backboard // Vibration. 2024. Vol. 7. No. 2. pp. 582-594.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Winarski D., Nygren K. P., Winarski T. Finite Element Analysis versus Empirical Modal Analysis of a Basketball Rim and Backboard // Vibration. 2024. Vol. 7. No. 2. pp. 582-594.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/vibration7020030
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2571-631X/7/2/30
TI - Finite Element Analysis versus Empirical Modal Analysis of a Basketball Rim and Backboard
T2 - Vibration
AU - Winarski, Daniel
AU - Nygren, Kip P.
AU - Winarski, Tyson
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/06/07
PB - MDPI
SP - 582-594
IS - 2
VL - 7
SN - 2571-631X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Winarski,
author = {Daniel Winarski and Kip P. Nygren and Tyson Winarski},
title = {Finite Element Analysis versus Empirical Modal Analysis of a Basketball Rim and Backboard},
journal = {Vibration},
year = {2024},
volume = {7},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {jun},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2571-631X/7/2/30},
number = {2},
pages = {582--594},
doi = {10.3390/vibration7020030}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Winarski, Daniel, et al. “Finite Element Analysis versus Empirical Modal Analysis of a Basketball Rim and Backboard.” Vibration, vol. 7, no. 2, Jun. 2024, pp. 582-594. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-631X/7/2/30.