Open Access
Open access
Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, volume 265, issue 2, pages 48

New Observational H(z) Data from Full-spectrum Fitting of Cosmic Chronometers in the LEGA-C Survey

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-03-29
scimago Q1
SJR3.329
CiteScore14.5
Impact factor8.6
ISSN00670049, 15384365
Space and Planetary Science
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Abstract

In this work, we perform a full-spectrum fitting of 350 massive and passive galaxies selected as cosmic chronometers from the LEGA-C ESO public survey to derive their stellar ages, metallicities, and star formation histories. We extensively test our results by assessing their dependence on the possible contribution of dust, calibration of noise and signal, and use of photometric data in addition to spectral information; we also identify indicators of the correct convergence of the results, including the shape of the posterior distributions, the analysis of specific spectral features, and the correct reproduction of the observed spectrum. We derive a clear age–redshift trend compatible with the aging in a standard cosmological model showing a clear downsizing pattern, with more massive galaxies being formed at higher redshift (z f ∼ 2.5) with respect to less massive ones (z f ∼ 2). From these data, we measure the differential aging of this population of cosmic chronometers to derive a new measurement of the Hubble parameter, obtaining H ( z = 0.8 ) = 113.1 ± 15.1 ( stat . ) 11.3 + 29.1 ( syst . ) . This analysis allows us to compare for the first time the differential ages of cosmic chronometers measured on the same sample with two completely different methods, the full-spectrum fit (this work) and the analysis of Lick indices, known to correlate with the age and metallicity of the stellar populations. Albeit an understood offset in the absolute ages, the differential ages have proven to be extremely compatible between the two methods, despite the very different data, assumptions, and models considered, demonstrating the robustness of the method.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
2
4
6
8
10
12
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?