Biofeedback, volume 47, issue 1, pages 12-21

Care for Biofeedback and Neurofeedback Instrumentation

Donald Moss 1
David Hagedorn 2
Didier Combatalade 2
Randy Neblett 3
1
 
Saybrook University, Oakland, CA
2
 
Thought Technology, Ltd., Montreal, Quebec
3
 
Productive Rehabilitation Institute of Dallas for Ergonomics, Dallas, TX
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-04-01
Journal: Biofeedback
SJR
CiteScore
Impact factor
ISSN10815937, 2158348X
General Chemistry
General Medicine
Abstract

Hagedorn (2014) has highlighted the infection risks in biofeedback and neurofeedback practice and identified broad strategies for mitigating infection risk. In the age of Clostridum difficile, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and human immunodeficiency virus, infection risk cannot be ignored in any health discipline that attaches sensors to patients' skin in most treatments. The present article discusses specific guidelines for care and hygiene of biofeedback and neurofeedback instruments, encoders, cables, and sensors. Attention to practice standards can greatly reduce the risk to practitioner and client alike.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
1

Publishers

1
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?