Hunan University of Technology and Business
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.

Publications
1 460
Citations
29 913
h-index
82
Top-3 journals

Journal of Cleaner Production
(28 publications)

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
(27 publications)

Sustainability
(22 publications)
Top-3 organizations

Central South University
(429 publications)

Hunan University
(221 publications)

Hunan Normal University
(75 publications)
Top-3 foreign organizations

University of Auckland
(25 publications)

Waseda University
(18 publications)

University of Pennsylvania
(15 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 137
Q1

A Comprehensive Survey on NOMA-Based Backscatter Communication for IoT Applications
Mondal S., Bepari D., Chandra A., Singh K., Li C., Ding Z.
Q1
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q3

Outage analysis of a content-based user pairing in NOMA
Mondal S., Choudhary S.K., Biswas U., Misra A., Bepari D.
Q3
International Journal of Electronics Letters
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q4

QueryAssist: Multimodal Verbal Specifications to Structured Query Conversion Model Using Word Vector-Based Semantic Analysis
Boddu S.V., Butta R.A., Sannidhi G., Yerakaraju M.V.
QueryAssist is a model designed to enhance communication with databases by transforming Telugu natural language queries, both text and speech, into SQL queries. Built for government schools of the Telugu-speaking states in India, this model utilizes Word Vectors for semantic analysis, ensuring accurate query generation. QueryAssist acts as an intuitive interface to interact with SQL databases, by addressing challenges faced by schools in accessing and utilizing data. Its standout features are its ability to comprehend Telugu queries and its error handling and refinement system. Through extensive experiments, QueryAssist has proven its effectiveness in transforming natural language queries into SQL commands. The model’s architecture, results, and its potential to improve the quality of decision-making processes within government schools are presented in this paper.
Q1

Blind Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation Techniques for Next-Generation Multicarrier Communication Systems: Challenges, Comparative Analysis, and Future Prospects
Singh S., Kumar S., Majhi S., Satija U., Yuen C.
Q1
IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
Q3

Analysis, implementation and research opportunities of radio over fiber link over the dispersive medium for next generation networks
Tamrakar B., Gupta V., Kanungo A., Verma V.K., Shukla S., Agrawal N., Singh M.K., Sinha A.
Wireless connections with high capacity, security, and affordability are becoming increasingly crucial for the growth of interactive multimedia and broadband services. A promising approach to meet this need is the use of radio frequency (RF) and optical fiber technology to distribute millimeter-wave signals. This article provides a summary of current research on the radio over fiber (RoF) technology and future uses for it in next-generation networks. Firstly, we introduce the basics of RoF technology, including its various components and architectures. We provided a comparative analysis between External Modulation Based and Direct Modulation based RoF link. On the basis of simulation analysis, the measured Q-Factor is 303.064 and 5.50 while using External and Direct modulation schemes respectively, for 1 dB/km optical fiber impairments. We also discuss the benefits and challenges of employing RoF technology in wireless access networks, highlighting the key issues that require attention for RoF technology to fully realize its potential. Afterward, we provide an extensive review of recent research on RoF technology. We examine the performance and limitations of used RoF link and identify the key research challenges in the associated field. Finally, we discuss the future directions and opportunities for research in RoF technology, our article aims to provide easy to understand of RoF technology and its impact on the next- generation networks.
Q2

Revolutionizing learning − A journey into educational games with immersive and AI technologies
Rapaka A., Dharmadhikari S.C., Kasat K., Mohan C.R., Chouhan K., Gupta M.
Q2
Entertainment Computing
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 8

Q2

Regular sequence graph of Noetherian normal local domain
Bhatwadekar S.M., Majithia J.
Q2
Communications in Algebra
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

A Novel Approach to Detection of COVID-19 and Other Respiratory Diseases Using Autoencoder and LSTM
Malviya A., Dixit R., Shukla A., Kushwaha N.
Innumerable approaches of deep learning-based COVID-19 detection systems have been suggested by researchers in the recent past, due to their ability to process high-dimensional, complex data, leading to more accurate prediction of the COVID-19 infected patients. There is a visible dominance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based models analysing chest images like X-rays and Computed Tomography (CT) scans for prediction, while the utilization of audio data for the same is less prevalent. Considering the respiratory system is one of the primary means by which the SARS-CoV-2 virus spreads, respiratory sounds are a potential biomarker for determining the presence of COVID-19. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for the detection of COVID-19 from amidst a dataset comprising of respiratory sound samples of healthy, COVID-19, and other lung diseases which are often misinterpreted as COVID-19. The approach employs an autoencoder for anomaly detection and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for the detection of COVID-19 from amongst other lung diseases. The first stage of the model comprises an encoder-decoder-based autoencoder model with baseline reconstruction error, trained in an unsupervised environment, to reconstruct “healthy” audio signals. An LSTM based multi-class classifier is proposed for the second stage to classify the infected samples into the five classes: COVID-19, Bronchiolitis, COPD, Pneumonia and URTI. The experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed approach in detecting COVID-19 from a 5-class test set of audio samples of patients suffering from respiratory disease, with an accuracy of 98.7%, and an AUC of 1.
Q1

Optimized Compact MIMO Antenna Design: HMSIW-Based and Cavity-Backed for Enhanced Bandwidth
Pramodini B., Chaturvedi D., Darasi L., Rana G., Kumar A.
Q1
IEEE Access
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
Q2

An Efficient Deep Learning Technique for Driver Drowsiness Detection
Ranjan A., Sharma S., Mate P., Verma A.
Deep learning techniques allow us to learn about a person’s behavior based on pictures and videos. Using digital cameras, the system can identify and classify a person’s behavior based on images and videos. This paper aims to present a method for detecting drivers’ drowsiness based on deep learning. To determine which transfer learning technique best suits this work, we used DenseNet169, MobileNetV2, ResNet50V2, VGG19, InceptionV3, and Xception on the dataset. The dataset used in this paper is the Driver Drowsiness Dataset (DDD), which is publicly available on Kaggle. This dataset consists of 41,790 RGB images, and each image has a size of 227 $$\times$$ 227, which has 2 classes: drowsy and not drowsy. The Drivers Drowsiness Dataset is based on the images extracted from the real-life Drowsiness dataset (RLDD). After comparing the results coming from all 6 models, the highest accuracy achieved was 100% by ResNet50V2, and various parameters are calculated like accuracy, F1 score, etc. Additionally, this work compared the results with existing methods to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Q1

Development of a QMSIW Antenna Sensor for Tumor Detection Utilizing a Hemispherical Multilayered Dielectric Breast-Shaped Phantom
Bhavani M., Chaturvedi D., Lanka T., Kumar A.
Q1
IEEE Sensors Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2

Q3

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Schiff Base-Based Transition Metal Complexes
Kumar M., Mishra V., Singh R.
In this study, two complexes [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2, and [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 were synthesized from the ligands known as 2-Acetyl thiophene thiosemicarbazone (C7H9N3S2), respectively. C7H9N3S2 was characterized using various characterization techniques. The study of magnetic moment values (4.92 B.M. for [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 and (2.93 for [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2) shows that the complexes are paramagnetic with octahedral geometry. The value of electrical conductance (184 Ohm−1 cm2 mole−1 for [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 and (173 Ohm−1 cm2 mole−1 for [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2) suggested that ligand to metal ratio is 2:1 in its structure. In addition, the electronic spectrum analysis (8000–8650, 20,800–21,580, and 16,200–17,500 cm−1 suggested that the [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 is spin-free octahedral complex. Similar way, the electronic spectrum values (9500–10,415, 14,200–14,940, and 23,500–24,000 cm−1 suggested that the [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 is in octahedral geometry. An infrared spectroscopy study showed that each equivalent ligand was attached to the metal with C=N, and C=S moiety using nitrogen and sulfur atoms. The vibration bands of νM-Cl were also observed at 325 for [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 and 350 cm−1 [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2. This observation confirms that Cl− ion is also coordinated with the metal ion. The article shows the synthesis and structure of new metal complexes [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 and [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 based on 2-Acetyl thiophene thiosemicarbazone ligands.
Q1

An integrated GIS-MCDM framework for zoning, ranking and sensitivity analysis of municipal landfill sites
Sharma K., Tiwari R., Wadhwani A.K., Chaturvedi S.
Q1
Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1

Q1

Blind CFOs Estimation by Capon Method for Multi-User MIMO-OFDMA Uplink System
Singh S., Kumar S., Majhi S., Satija U.
Q1
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2

Q2

Automatic Cauliflower Disease Detection Using Fine-Tuning Transfer Learning Approach
Abdul Azeem N., Sharma S., Verma A.
Plants are a major food source worldwide, and to provide a healthy crop yield, they must be protected from diseases. However, checking each plant to detect and classify every type of disease can be time-consuming and would require enormous expert manual labor. These difficulties can be solved using deep learning techniques and algorithms. It can check diseased crops and even categorize the type of disease at a very early stage to prevent its further spread to other crops. This paper proposed a deep-learning approach to detect and classify cauliflower diseases. Several deep learning architectures were experimented on our selected dataset VegNet, a novel dataset containing 656 cauliflower images categorized into four classes: downy mildew, black rot, bacterial spot rot, and healthy. We analyzed the results conducted, and the best test accuracy reached was 99.25% with an F1-Score of 0.993 by NASNetMobile architecture, outperforming many other neural networks and displaying the model’s efficiency for plant disease detection.
Since 2008
Total publications
1460
Total citations
29913
Citations per publication
20.49
Average publications per year
85.88
Average authors per publication
4.85
h-index
82
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
Top-30
Fields of science
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Applied Mathematics
|
Applied Mathematics, 114, 7.81%
Applied Mathematics
114 publications, 7.81%
|
Computer Science Applications
|
Computer Science Applications, 110, 7.53%
Computer Science Applications
110 publications, 7.53%
|
General Engineering
|
General Engineering, 109, 7.47%
General Engineering
109 publications, 7.47%
|
Software
|
Software, 101, 6.92%
Software
101 publications, 6.92%
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 98, 6.71%
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
98 publications, 6.71%
|
Computer Networks and Communications
|
Computer Networks and Communications, 92, 6.3%
Computer Networks and Communications
92 publications, 6.3%
|
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
|
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 86, 5.89%
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
86 publications, 5.89%
|
Artificial Intelligence
|
Artificial Intelligence, 84, 5.75%
Artificial Intelligence
84 publications, 5.75%
|
General Materials Science
|
General Materials Science, 76, 5.21%
General Materials Science
76 publications, 5.21%
|
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
|
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 73, 5%
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
73 publications, 5%
|
Economics and Econometrics
|
Economics and Econometrics, 73, 5%
Economics and Econometrics
73 publications, 5%
|
General Medicine
|
General Medicine, 72, 4.93%
General Medicine
72 publications, 4.93%
|
Strategy and Management
|
Strategy and Management, 72, 4.93%
Strategy and Management
72 publications, 4.93%
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 70, 4.79%
General Chemistry
70 publications, 4.79%
|
Environmental Chemistry
|
Environmental Chemistry, 62, 4.25%
Environmental Chemistry
62 publications, 4.25%
|
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
|
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 62, 4.25%
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
62 publications, 4.25%
|
General Mathematics
|
General Mathematics, 60, 4.11%
General Mathematics
60 publications, 4.11%
|
General Physics and Astronomy
|
General Physics and Astronomy, 59, 4.04%
General Physics and Astronomy
59 publications, 4.04%
|
Condensed Matter Physics
|
Condensed Matter Physics, 59, 4.04%
Condensed Matter Physics
59 publications, 4.04%
|
Information Systems
|
Information Systems, 56, 3.84%
Information Systems
56 publications, 3.84%
|
Control and Systems Engineering
|
Control and Systems Engineering, 55, 3.77%
Control and Systems Engineering
55 publications, 3.77%
|
Pollution
|
Pollution, 50, 3.42%
Pollution
50 publications, 3.42%
|
General Environmental Science
|
General Environmental Science, 50, 3.42%
General Environmental Science
50 publications, 3.42%
|
General Computer Science
|
General Computer Science, 49, 3.36%
General Computer Science
49 publications, 3.36%
|
Analysis
|
Analysis, 47, 3.22%
Analysis
47 publications, 3.22%
|
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
|
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 44, 3.01%
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
44 publications, 3.01%
|
Environmental Engineering
|
Environmental Engineering, 43, 2.95%
Environmental Engineering
43 publications, 2.95%
|
Mechanical Engineering
|
Mechanical Engineering, 42, 2.88%
Mechanical Engineering
42 publications, 2.88%
|
Hardware and Architecture
|
Hardware and Architecture, 42, 2.88%
Hardware and Architecture
42 publications, 2.88%
|
Building and Construction
|
Building and Construction, 41, 2.81%
Building and Construction
41 publications, 2.81%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Journals
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
28 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
27 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Sustainability
22 publications, 1.51%
|
|
IEEE Access
22 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
22 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
19 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
18 publications, 1.23%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
17 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Separation and Purification Technology
16 publications, 1.1%
|
|
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
15 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
15 publications, 1.03%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
14 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Applied Mathematics Letters
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Key Engineering Materials
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Results in Physics
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
10 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
10 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Neural Computing and Applications
9 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Chemosphere
9 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Information Sciences
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Finance Research Letters
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Resources Policy
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Mathematics
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Sensors
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishers
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
Elsevier
464 publications, 31.78%
|
|
Springer Nature
272 publications, 18.63%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
120 publications, 8.22%
|
|
MDPI
93 publications, 6.37%
|
|
Wiley
78 publications, 5.34%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
61 publications, 4.18%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
51 publications, 3.49%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
43 publications, 2.95%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
26 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
26 publications, 1.78%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
25 publications, 1.71%
|
|
IOP Publishing
25 publications, 1.71%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
23 publications, 1.58%
|
|
World Scientific
20 publications, 1.37%
|
|
IOS Press
14 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
SAGE
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
AIP Publishing
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Emerald
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Oxford University Press
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
EDP Sciences
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Science in China Press
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
With other organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
Central South University
429 publications, 29.38%
|
|
Hunan University
221 publications, 15.14%
|
|
Hunan Normal University
75 publications, 5.14%
|
|
Hunan University of Science and Technology
52 publications, 3.56%
|
|
Wuhan University
31 publications, 2.12%
|
|
Changsha University of Science and Technology
26 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Auckland
25 publications, 1.71%
|
|
National University of Defense Technology
23 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Xiangtan University
22 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
21 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Hunan Agricultural University
20 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Shenzhen University
19 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Honghe University
18 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Waseda University
18 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Hunan University of Finance and Economics
16 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Sichuan University
15 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Central South University of Forestry and Technology
15 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Nanjing University
15 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Guangzhou University
15 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
15 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Zhejiang University
14 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Southeast University
14 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Hunan University of Technology
14 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
13 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Changsha University
13 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Purdue University
13 publications, 0.89%
|
|
South China University of Technology
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Xinjiang University
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
With foreign organizations
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
University of Auckland
25 publications, 1.71%
|
|
Waseda University
18 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
15 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Purdue University
13 publications, 0.89%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Hosei University
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
10 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
10 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Alberta
10 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Durham University
9 publications, 0.62%
|
|
AGH University of Krakow
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Pembroke
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
National University of Singapore
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
St. Francis Xavier University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Georgia State University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Northumbria University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Aalborg University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Brunel University London
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Lebanese American University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Loughborough University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Birmingham
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Yale University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Osaka University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Tokai University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
With other countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
USA
|
USA, 91, 6.23%
USA
91 publications, 6.23%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 45, 3.08%
Japan
45 publications, 3.08%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 42, 2.88%
United Kingdom
42 publications, 2.88%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 30, 2.05%
Canada
30 publications, 2.05%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 28, 1.92%
New Zealand
28 publications, 1.92%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 24, 1.64%
Romania
24 publications, 1.64%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 21, 1.44%
Australia
21 publications, 1.44%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 19, 1.3%
Singapore
19 publications, 1.3%
|
France
|
France, 17, 1.16%
France
17 publications, 1.16%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 14, 0.96%
Poland
14 publications, 0.96%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 13, 0.89%
Saudi Arabia
13 publications, 0.89%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 9, 0.62%
Spain
9 publications, 0.62%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 8, 0.55%
Indonesia
8 publications, 0.55%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 0.48%
Turkey
7 publications, 0.48%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 6, 0.41%
Norway
6 publications, 0.41%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 6, 0.41%
Pakistan
6 publications, 0.41%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 6, 0.41%
Republic of Korea
6 publications, 0.41%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.34%
Greece
5 publications, 0.34%
|
India
|
India, 4, 0.27%
India
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.27%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 0.27%
Netherlands
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 4, 0.27%
Czech Republic
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.21%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.21%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.21%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.21%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.21%
Iran
3 publications, 0.21%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.21%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.21%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 2, 0.14%
Germany
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.14%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.14%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.14%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
- Publications published earlier than 2008 are ignored in the statistics.
- The horizontal charts show the 30 top positions.
- Journals quartiles values are relevant at the moment.