Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.

Publications
2 435
Citations
129 186
h-index
163
Top-3 journals
Top-3 organizations

Baylor College of Medicine
(1447 publications)

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
(546 publications)

Texas Children's Hospital
(404 publications)
Top-3 foreign organizations

University of British Columbia
(45 publications)

Umeå University
(43 publications)

University of Toronto
(43 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 137
Q1

A Comprehensive Survey on NOMA-Based Backscatter Communication for IoT Applications
Mondal S., Bepari D., Chandra A., Singh K., Li C., Ding Z.
Q1
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q3

Outage analysis of a content-based user pairing in NOMA
Mondal S., Choudhary S.K., Biswas U., Misra A., Bepari D.
Q3
International Journal of Electronics Letters
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q4

QueryAssist: Multimodal Verbal Specifications to Structured Query Conversion Model Using Word Vector-Based Semantic Analysis
Boddu S.V., Butta R.A., Sannidhi G., Yerakaraju M.V.
QueryAssist is a model designed to enhance communication with databases by transforming Telugu natural language queries, both text and speech, into SQL queries. Built for government schools of the Telugu-speaking states in India, this model utilizes Word Vectors for semantic analysis, ensuring accurate query generation. QueryAssist acts as an intuitive interface to interact with SQL databases, by addressing challenges faced by schools in accessing and utilizing data. Its standout features are its ability to comprehend Telugu queries and its error handling and refinement system. Through extensive experiments, QueryAssist has proven its effectiveness in transforming natural language queries into SQL commands. The model’s architecture, results, and its potential to improve the quality of decision-making processes within government schools are presented in this paper.
Q1

Blind Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation Techniques for Next-Generation Multicarrier Communication Systems: Challenges, Comparative Analysis, and Future Prospects
Singh S., Kumar S., Majhi S., Satija U., Yuen C.
Q1
IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
Q3

Analysis, implementation and research opportunities of radio over fiber link over the dispersive medium for next generation networks
Tamrakar B., Gupta V., Kanungo A., Verma V.K., Shukla S., Agrawal N., Singh M.K., Sinha A.
Wireless connections with high capacity, security, and affordability are becoming increasingly crucial for the growth of interactive multimedia and broadband services. A promising approach to meet this need is the use of radio frequency (RF) and optical fiber technology to distribute millimeter-wave signals. This article provides a summary of current research on the radio over fiber (RoF) technology and future uses for it in next-generation networks. Firstly, we introduce the basics of RoF technology, including its various components and architectures. We provided a comparative analysis between External Modulation Based and Direct Modulation based RoF link. On the basis of simulation analysis, the measured Q-Factor is 303.064 and 5.50 while using External and Direct modulation schemes respectively, for 1 dB/km optical fiber impairments. We also discuss the benefits and challenges of employing RoF technology in wireless access networks, highlighting the key issues that require attention for RoF technology to fully realize its potential. Afterward, we provide an extensive review of recent research on RoF technology. We examine the performance and limitations of used RoF link and identify the key research challenges in the associated field. Finally, we discuss the future directions and opportunities for research in RoF technology, our article aims to provide easy to understand of RoF technology and its impact on the next- generation networks.
Q2

Revolutionizing learning − A journey into educational games with immersive and AI technologies
Rapaka A., Dharmadhikari S.C., Kasat K., Mohan C.R., Chouhan K., Gupta M.
Q2
Entertainment Computing
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 8

Q2

Regular sequence graph of Noetherian normal local domain
Bhatwadekar S.M., Majithia J.
Q2
Communications in Algebra
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

A Novel Approach to Detection of COVID-19 and Other Respiratory Diseases Using Autoencoder and LSTM
Malviya A., Dixit R., Shukla A., Kushwaha N.
Innumerable approaches of deep learning-based COVID-19 detection systems have been suggested by researchers in the recent past, due to their ability to process high-dimensional, complex data, leading to more accurate prediction of the COVID-19 infected patients. There is a visible dominance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based models analysing chest images like X-rays and Computed Tomography (CT) scans for prediction, while the utilization of audio data for the same is less prevalent. Considering the respiratory system is one of the primary means by which the SARS-CoV-2 virus spreads, respiratory sounds are a potential biomarker for determining the presence of COVID-19. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for the detection of COVID-19 from amidst a dataset comprising of respiratory sound samples of healthy, COVID-19, and other lung diseases which are often misinterpreted as COVID-19. The approach employs an autoencoder for anomaly detection and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for the detection of COVID-19 from amongst other lung diseases. The first stage of the model comprises an encoder-decoder-based autoencoder model with baseline reconstruction error, trained in an unsupervised environment, to reconstruct “healthy” audio signals. An LSTM based multi-class classifier is proposed for the second stage to classify the infected samples into the five classes: COVID-19, Bronchiolitis, COPD, Pneumonia and URTI. The experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed approach in detecting COVID-19 from a 5-class test set of audio samples of patients suffering from respiratory disease, with an accuracy of 98.7%, and an AUC of 1.
Q1

Optimized Compact MIMO Antenna Design: HMSIW-Based and Cavity-Backed for Enhanced Bandwidth
Pramodini B., Chaturvedi D., Darasi L., Rana G., Kumar A.
Q1
IEEE Access
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
Q2

An Efficient Deep Learning Technique for Driver Drowsiness Detection
Ranjan A., Sharma S., Mate P., Verma A.
Deep learning techniques allow us to learn about a person’s behavior based on pictures and videos. Using digital cameras, the system can identify and classify a person’s behavior based on images and videos. This paper aims to present a method for detecting drivers’ drowsiness based on deep learning. To determine which transfer learning technique best suits this work, we used DenseNet169, MobileNetV2, ResNet50V2, VGG19, InceptionV3, and Xception on the dataset. The dataset used in this paper is the Driver Drowsiness Dataset (DDD), which is publicly available on Kaggle. This dataset consists of 41,790 RGB images, and each image has a size of 227 $$\times$$ 227, which has 2 classes: drowsy and not drowsy. The Drivers Drowsiness Dataset is based on the images extracted from the real-life Drowsiness dataset (RLDD). After comparing the results coming from all 6 models, the highest accuracy achieved was 100% by ResNet50V2, and various parameters are calculated like accuracy, F1 score, etc. Additionally, this work compared the results with existing methods to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Q1

Development of a QMSIW Antenna Sensor for Tumor Detection Utilizing a Hemispherical Multilayered Dielectric Breast-Shaped Phantom
Bhavani M., Chaturvedi D., Lanka T., Kumar A.
Q1
IEEE Sensors Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2

Q3

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Schiff Base-Based Transition Metal Complexes
Kumar M., Mishra V., Singh R.
In this study, two complexes [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2, and [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 were synthesized from the ligands known as 2-Acetyl thiophene thiosemicarbazone (C7H9N3S2), respectively. C7H9N3S2 was characterized using various characterization techniques. The study of magnetic moment values (4.92 B.M. for [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 and (2.93 for [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2) shows that the complexes are paramagnetic with octahedral geometry. The value of electrical conductance (184 Ohm−1 cm2 mole−1 for [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 and (173 Ohm−1 cm2 mole−1 for [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2) suggested that ligand to metal ratio is 2:1 in its structure. In addition, the electronic spectrum analysis (8000–8650, 20,800–21,580, and 16,200–17,500 cm−1 suggested that the [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 is spin-free octahedral complex. Similar way, the electronic spectrum values (9500–10,415, 14,200–14,940, and 23,500–24,000 cm−1 suggested that the [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 is in octahedral geometry. An infrared spectroscopy study showed that each equivalent ligand was attached to the metal with C=N, and C=S moiety using nitrogen and sulfur atoms. The vibration bands of νM-Cl were also observed at 325 for [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 and 350 cm−1 [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2. This observation confirms that Cl− ion is also coordinated with the metal ion. The article shows the synthesis and structure of new metal complexes [Co(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 and [Ni(C7H9N3S2)2Cl2]Cl2 based on 2-Acetyl thiophene thiosemicarbazone ligands.
Q1

An integrated GIS-MCDM framework for zoning, ranking and sensitivity analysis of municipal landfill sites
Sharma K., Tiwari R., Wadhwani A.K., Chaturvedi S.
Q1
Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1

Q1

Blind CFOs Estimation by Capon Method for Multi-User MIMO-OFDMA Uplink System
Singh S., Kumar S., Majhi S., Satija U.
Q1
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2

Q2

Automatic Cauliflower Disease Detection Using Fine-Tuning Transfer Learning Approach
Abdul Azeem N., Sharma S., Verma A.
Plants are a major food source worldwide, and to provide a healthy crop yield, they must be protected from diseases. However, checking each plant to detect and classify every type of disease can be time-consuming and would require enormous expert manual labor. These difficulties can be solved using deep learning techniques and algorithms. It can check diseased crops and even categorize the type of disease at a very early stage to prevent its further spread to other crops. This paper proposed a deep-learning approach to detect and classify cauliflower diseases. Several deep learning architectures were experimented on our selected dataset VegNet, a novel dataset containing 656 cauliflower images categorized into four classes: downy mildew, black rot, bacterial spot rot, and healthy. We analyzed the results conducted, and the best test accuracy reached was 99.25% with an F1-Score of 0.993 by NASNetMobile architecture, outperforming many other neural networks and displaying the model’s efficiency for plant disease detection.
Since 2006
Total publications
2435
Total citations
129186
Citations per publication
53.05
Average publications per year
128.16
Average authors per publication
13.43
h-index
163
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
Top-30
Fields of science
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
Oncology
|
Oncology, 869, 35.69%
Oncology
869 publications, 35.69%
|
Cancer Research
|
Cancer Research, 719, 29.53%
Cancer Research
719 publications, 29.53%
|
Molecular Biology
|
Molecular Biology, 258, 10.6%
Molecular Biology
258 publications, 10.6%
|
Cell Biology
|
Cell Biology, 257, 10.55%
Cell Biology
257 publications, 10.55%
|
Multidisciplinary
|
Multidisciplinary, 207, 8.5%
Multidisciplinary
207 publications, 8.5%
|
Hematology
|
Hematology, 207, 8.5%
Hematology
207 publications, 8.5%
|
General Medicine
|
General Medicine, 201, 8.25%
General Medicine
201 publications, 8.25%
|
Biochemistry
|
Biochemistry, 192, 7.89%
Biochemistry
192 publications, 7.89%
|
Genetics
|
Genetics, 186, 7.64%
Genetics
186 publications, 7.64%
|
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
|
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 182, 7.47%
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
182 publications, 7.47%
|
Immunology
|
Immunology, 177, 7.27%
Immunology
177 publications, 7.27%
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 95, 3.9%
General Chemistry
95 publications, 3.9%
|
General Physics and Astronomy
|
General Physics and Astronomy, 87, 3.57%
General Physics and Astronomy
87 publications, 3.57%
|
Epidemiology
|
Epidemiology, 72, 2.96%
Epidemiology
72 publications, 2.96%
|
Molecular Medicine
|
Molecular Medicine, 71, 2.92%
Molecular Medicine
71 publications, 2.92%
|
Gastroenterology
|
Gastroenterology, 70, 2.87%
Gastroenterology
70 publications, 2.87%
|
Neurology (clinical)
|
Neurology (clinical), 63, 2.59%
Neurology (clinical)
63 publications, 2.59%
|
Surgery
|
Surgery, 60, 2.46%
Surgery
60 publications, 2.46%
|
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
|
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, 57, 2.34%
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
57 publications, 2.34%
|
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
|
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 56, 2.3%
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
56 publications, 2.3%
|
Immunology and Allergy
|
Immunology and Allergy, 53, 2.18%
Immunology and Allergy
53 publications, 2.18%
|
Urology
|
Urology, 49, 2.01%
Urology
49 publications, 2.01%
|
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
|
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 48, 1.97%
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
48 publications, 1.97%
|
Genetics (clinical)
|
Genetics (clinical), 44, 1.81%
Genetics (clinical)
44 publications, 1.81%
|
Hepatology
|
Hepatology, 41, 1.68%
Hepatology
41 publications, 1.68%
|
Endocrinology
|
Endocrinology, 40, 1.64%
Endocrinology
40 publications, 1.64%
|
Physiology
|
Physiology, 40, 1.64%
Physiology
40 publications, 1.64%
|
Pharmacology
|
Pharmacology, 39, 1.6%
Pharmacology
39 publications, 1.6%
|
Pharmacology (medical)
|
Pharmacology (medical), 39, 1.6%
Pharmacology (medical)
39 publications, 1.6%
|
Infectious Diseases
|
Infectious Diseases, 30, 1.23%
Infectious Diseases
30 publications, 1.23%
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
Cancer Research
131 publications, 5.38%
|
|
Blood
108 publications, 4.44%
|
|
Nature Communications
89 publications, 3.66%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Oncology
75 publications, 3.08%
|
|
Scientific Reports
52 publications, 2.14%
|
|
Oncogene
51 publications, 2.09%
|
|
Clinical Cancer Research
48 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
46 publications, 1.89%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
41 publications, 1.68%
|
|
PLoS ONE
40 publications, 1.64%
|
|
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
39 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Oncotarget
37 publications, 1.52%
|
|
Neuro-Oncology
34 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Cancers
33 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Cancer
22 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Pediatric Blood and Cancer
21 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Nature Genetics
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Cell Reports
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Nature
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Breast Cancer Research
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
British Journal of Cancer
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Science advances
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Cancer Medicine
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
16 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Cancer Discovery
15 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
15 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
15 publications, 0.62%
|
|
International Journal of Cancer
15 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Molecular Endocrinology
15 publications, 0.62%
|
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
Publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Springer Nature
660 publications, 27.1%
|
|
Elsevier
345 publications, 14.17%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
278 publications, 11.42%
|
|
Wiley
195 publications, 8.01%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
120 publications, 4.93%
|
|
Oxford University Press
119 publications, 4.89%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
81 publications, 3.33%
|
|
MDPI
76 publications, 3.12%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
51 publications, 2.09%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
41 publications, 1.68%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
41 publications, 1.68%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
39 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Impact Journals
39 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
38 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
37 publications, 1.52%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
28 publications, 1.15%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
SAGE
16 publications, 0.66%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
15 publications, 0.62%
|
|
BMJ
14 publications, 0.57%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
13 publications, 0.53%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
13 publications, 0.53%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
9 publications, 0.37%
|
|
American Physiological Society
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Society for the Study of Reproduction
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
With other organizations
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
1447 publications, 59.43%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
546 publications, 22.42%
|
|
Texas Children's Hospital
404 publications, 16.59%
|
|
Harvard University
161 publications, 6.61%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
160 publications, 6.57%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
125 publications, 5.13%
|
|
National Cancer Institute
117 publications, 4.8%
|
|
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
102 publications, 4.19%
|
|
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
96 publications, 3.94%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
92 publications, 3.78%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
91 publications, 3.74%
|
|
University of Southern California
90 publications, 3.7%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
83 publications, 3.41%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
82 publications, 3.37%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
77 publications, 3.16%
|
|
University of Washington
76 publications, 3.12%
|
|
University of Michigan
73 publications, 3%
|
|
University of Houston
72 publications, 2.96%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
71 publications, 2.92%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
70 publications, 2.87%
|
|
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
62 publications, 2.55%
|
|
Cornell University
59 publications, 2.42%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
57 publications, 2.34%
|
|
Yale University
54 publications, 2.22%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
53 publications, 2.18%
|
|
Stanford University
51 publications, 2.09%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
51 publications, 2.09%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
51 publications, 2.09%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
46 publications, 1.89%
|
|
University of British Columbia
45 publications, 1.85%
|
|
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
With foreign organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
University of British Columbia
45 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Umeå University
43 publications, 1.77%
|
|
University of Toronto
43 publications, 1.77%
|
|
University of Cambridge
37 publications, 1.52%
|
|
Central South University
30 publications, 1.23%
|
|
International Agency for Research on Cancer
26 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Danish Cancer Society
25 publications, 1.03%
|
|
East China Normal University
22 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
21 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
21 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
McGill University
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Sheba Medical Center
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
King's College London
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Sheffield
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Tongji University
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Lund University
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Liverpool
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Harbin Medical University
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
German Cancer Research Center
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Fudan University
17 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
17 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública
17 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
16 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Netherlands Cancer Institute
16 publications, 0.66%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
With other countries
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
China
|
China, 239, 9.82%
China
239 publications, 9.82%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 181, 7.43%
United Kingdom
181 publications, 7.43%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 144, 5.91%
Canada
144 publications, 5.91%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 100, 4.11%
Germany
100 publications, 4.11%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 82, 3.37%
Italy
82 publications, 3.37%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 79, 3.24%
Sweden
79 publications, 3.24%
|
France
|
France, 73, 3%
France
73 publications, 3%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 65, 2.67%
Spain
65 publications, 2.67%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 62, 2.55%
Netherlands
62 publications, 2.55%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 55, 2.26%
Republic of Korea
55 publications, 2.26%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 52, 2.14%
Denmark
52 publications, 2.14%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 50, 2.05%
Australia
50 publications, 2.05%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 46, 1.89%
Japan
46 publications, 1.89%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 43, 1.77%
Switzerland
43 publications, 1.77%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 40, 1.64%
Israel
40 publications, 1.64%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 30, 1.23%
Norway
30 publications, 1.23%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 24, 0.99%
Austria
24 publications, 0.99%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 23, 0.94%
Belgium
23 publications, 0.94%
|
India
|
India, 21, 0.86%
India
21 publications, 0.86%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 20, 0.82%
Czech Republic
20 publications, 0.82%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 19, 0.78%
Brazil
19 publications, 0.78%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 16, 0.66%
Singapore
16 publications, 0.66%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 12, 0.49%
Ireland
12 publications, 0.49%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 12, 0.49%
Mexico
12 publications, 0.49%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 12, 0.49%
Poland
12 publications, 0.49%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 10, 0.41%
Russia
10 publications, 0.41%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 10, 0.41%
Turkey
10 publications, 0.41%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 8, 0.33%
Egypt
8 publications, 0.33%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 8, 0.33%
Finland
8 publications, 0.33%
|
50
100
150
200
250
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
- Publications published earlier than 2006 are ignored in the statistics.
- The horizontal charts show the 30 top positions.
- Journals quartiles values are relevant at the moment.