Smirnova, Nadezhda S
Publications
66
Citations
655
h-index
16
Laboratory of metal complex catalysis
Senior Researcher
Publications found: 128

Blockchained Adaptive Federated Auto MetaLearning BigData and DevOps CyberSecurity Architecture in Industry 4.0
Demertzis K., Iliadis L., Pimenidis E., Tziritas N., Koziri M., Kikiras P.
Maximizing the production process in modern industry, as proposed by Industry 4.0, requires extensive use of Cyber-Physical Systems (CbPS). Artificial intelligence technologies, through CbPS, allow monitoring of natural processes, making autonomous, decentralized and optimal decisions. Collection of information that optimizes the effectiveness of decisions, implies the need for big data management and analysis. This data is usually coming from heterogeneous sources and it might be non-interoperable. Big data management is further complicated by the need to protect information, to ensure business confidentiality and privacy, according to the recent General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR. This paper introduces an innovative holistic Blockchained Adaptive Federated Auto Meta Learning Big Data and DevOps Cyber Security Architecture in Industry 4.0. The aim is to fill the gap found in the ways of handling and securing industrial data. This architecture, combines the most modern software development technologies under an optimal and efficient framework. It successfully achieves the prediction and assessment of threat-related conditions in an industrial ecosystem, while ensuring privacy and secrecy.

A Hybrid Deep Learning Ensemble for Cyber Intrusion Detection
Psathas A.P., Iliadis L., Papaleonidas A., Bountas D.
The daily growth of computer networks usage increases the need to protect users from malware and other threats. This paper, presents a hybrid Intrusion Detecting System (IDS) comprising of a 2-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (2-D CNN), a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) for the detection of 9 Cyber Attacks versus normal flow. The timely Kitsune Network attack dataset was used in this research. The proposed model achieved an overall accuracy of 92.66%, 90.64% and 90.56% in the train, validation and testing phases respectively. The typical five classification indices Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, F1-Score and Precision were calculated following the “One-Versus-All Strategy”. Their values clearly support the fact that the model can generalize and that it can be used as a prototype for further research on network security enhancement.

Deep Learning of Brain Asymmetry Images and Transfer Learning for Early Diagnosis of Dementia
Herzog N.J., Magoulas G.D.
Advances in neural networks and deep learning have opened a new era in medical imaging technology, health care data analysis and clinical diagnosis. This paper focuses on the classification of MRI for diagnosis of early and progressive dementia using transfer learning architectures that employ Convolutional Neural Networks-CNNs, as a base model, and fully connected layers of Softmax functions or Support Vector Machines-SVMs. The diagnostic process is based on the analysis of the neurodegenerative changes in the brain using segmented images of brain asymmetry, which has been identified as a predictive imaging source of early dementia. Results from 300 independent simulation runs on a set of four binary and one multiclass MRI classification tasks illustrate that transfer learning of CNN-based models equipped with SVM output layer is capable to produce better performing models within a few training epochs compared to commonly used transfer learning architectures that combine CNN pretrained models with fully connected Softmax layers. However, experimental findings also confirm that longer training sessions appear to compensate for the shortcomings of the fully connected Softmax layers in the long term. Diagnosis of early dementia on unseen patients’ brain asymmetry MRI data reached an average accuracy of 90.25% with both transfer learning architectures, while progressive dementia was promptly diagnosed with an accuracy that reached 95.90% using a transfer learning architecture that has the SVM layer.

Image Pre-processing and Segmentation for Real-Time Subsea Corrosion Inspection
Pirie C., Moreno-Garcia C.F.
Inspection engineering is a highly important field in the Oil & Gas sector for analysing the health of offshore assets. Corrosion, a naturally occurring phenomenon, arises as a result of a chemical reaction between a metal and its environment, causing it to degrade over time. Costing the global economy an estimated US $2.5 Trillion per annum, the destructive nature of corrosion is evident. Following the downturn endured by the industry in recent times, the need to combat corrosion is escalated, as companies look to cut costs by increasing efficiency of operations without compromising critical processes. This paper presents a step towards automating solutions for real-time inspection using state-of-the-art computer vision and deep learning techniques. Experiments concluded that there is potential for the application of computer vision in the inspection domain. In particular, Mask R-CNN applied on the original images (i.e. without any form of pre-processing) was found to be most viable solution, with the results showing a mAP of 77.1%.

Face Spoof Detection: An Experimental Framework
Abdullakutty F., Elyan E., Johnston P.
Face
recognition has recently become widespread in security applications. Although advancing technology has improved the performance of these systems, they are still prone to various attacks, including spoofing. The inherent feature extraction capability of machine learning techniques and deep neural networks has facilitated more accurate performance in spoofing detection. However, challenges still remain in the generalisation of these methods. One significant challenge is training dataset limitation in terms of size and variance. This paper investigates how different train/test ratios and variance in training data affect model performance with the NUAA dataset for spoofing detection. We show how using different splits of this dataset results in different models with different performances. We also open up new research directions by demonstrating how the problem of generalisation can be neatly demonstrated with an existing manageable dataset.

Squeeze-and-Threshold Based Quantization for Low-Precision Neural Networks
Wu B., Waschneck B., Mayr C.
In this work, we propose a method based on attention to quantize convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to run on low-precision (binary and multi-bit). Intuitively, high-quality pictures are very conducive to distinguishing objects. However, even in low-quality black-and-white photos (analogous to low-precision), various features can also be well distinguished and the content is easily understood. Based on this intuition, we introduce an attention-based block called squeeze-and-threshold (ST) to adjust different features to different ranges and learn the best threshold to distinguish (quantize) them. Furthermore, to eliminate the extra calculations caused by the ST block in the inference process, we propose a momentum-based method to learn the inference threshold during the training stage. Additionally, with the help of ST block, our quantization approach is faster and takes less than half the training epochs of prior multi-bit quantization works. The experimental results on different datasets and networks show the versatility of our method and demonstrate state-of-the-art performance.

Event-Detection Deep Neural Network for OTDR Trace Analysis
Rutigliano D., Boracchi G., Invernizzi P., Sozio E., Alippi C., Binetti S.
The Optical Time Domain Reflectometer (OTDR) is an optoelectronic instrument used to characterize an optical fiber using the measure of scattered or reflected light from points along the fiber. The resulting signal, namely the OTDR trace, is commonly used to identify and localize possible critical events in the fiber. In this work we address the problem of automatically detecting optical events in OTDR traces, and present the first 1D object-detection neural network for optical trace analysis.
Our approach takes inspiration from a successful object detection network in images, the Faster R-CNN, which we adapt to time series domain. The proposed network can both classify and localize many optical events along an input trace. Our results show that the proposed solution is more accurate than existing software currently analyzing OTDR traces, improving the mean average precision score by
$$27.43\%$$
. In contrast with existing solutions that are not able to distinguish many types of events, our algorithm can be trained in an end-to-end manner to detect potentially any type of optic event. Moreover, our network has been deployed on embedded OTDR devices to be executed in real-time.

Liver Cancer Trait Detection and Classification Through Machine Learning on Smart Mobile Devices
Giannou O., Giannou A.D., Zazara D.E., Kleinschmidt D., Mummert T., Stüben B.O., Kaul M.G., Adam G., Huber S., Pavlidis G.
Machine learning techniques have provided a technological evolution in medicine and especially in the field of medical imaging. The aim of this study is to firstly compare multiple transfer learning architecture models such as MobilleNetVn (n = 1, 2), InceptionVn (n = 1, 2, 3, 4), InceptionResNet, VGG16 and NasNetMobile and provide a final performance estimation, using a variety of metrics, secondly, propose an efficient and accurate classifier for liver cancer trait detection and prediction, and thirdly, develop a mobile application which uses the proposed model to classify liver cancer traits into various categories in real-time. Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) of mouse liver cancer of different origin were used as input datasets for our experiments. However, the required memory by the deployed Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models on smart mobile devices or embedded systems for real time applications, is an issue to be addressed. Here, all the baseline pre-trained CNN models on the ImageNet dataset were trained on a dataset of MRI images of mice of different genetic background with genetically- or chemically- induced hepatocellular cancer. We present and compare all main metric values for each model such as accuracy, cross entropy, f-score, confusion matrix for various types of classification. Data analysis verifies that the proposed optimized architecture model for this task of liver cancer trait classification and prediction, the MV1-LCCP, shows a suitable performance in terms of memory utilization and accuracy, suitable to be deployed in the mobile Android application, which is also developed and presented in this paper.

Real-Time Multimodal Emotion Classification System in E-Learning Context
Nandi A., Xhafa F., Subirats L., Fort S.
Emotions of learners are crucial and important in e-learning as they promote learning. To investigate the effects of emotions on improving and optimizing the outcomes of e-learning, machine learning models have been proposed in the literature. However, proposed models so far are suitable for offline mode, where data for emotion classification is stored and can be accessed boundlessly. In contrast, when data arrives in a stream, the model can see the data once and real-time response is required for real-time emotion classification. Additionally, researchers have identified that single data modality is incapable of capturing the complete insight of the learning experience and emotions. So, multi-modal data streams such as electroencephalogram (EEG), Respiratory Belt (RB), electrodermal activity data (EDA), etc., are utilized to improve the accuracy and provide deeper insights in learners’ emotion and learning experience. In this paper, we propose a Real-time Multimodal Emotion Classification System (ReMECS) based on Feed-Forward Neural Network, trained in an online fashion using the Incremental Stochastic Gradient Descent algorithm. To validate the performance of ReMECS, we have used the popular multimodal benchmark emotion classification dataset called DEAP. The results (accuracy and F1-score) show that the ReMECS can adequately classify emotions in real-time from the multimodal data stream in comparison to the state-of-the-art approaches.

Deep Neural Networks for Indoor Geomagnetic Field Fingerprinting with Regression Approach
Abid M., Lefebvre G.
Geomagnetic field fingerprinting is an attractive alternative to WiFi and Bluetooth fingerprinting since the magnetic field is omnipresent and independent of any infrastructure. Recently, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) have been extensively used to provide fingerprinting solutions for indoor positioning based on magnetic data. Yet, no fairly comparative study has been conducted to determine which type of networks is more likely to recognize magnetic sequence patterns. In this study, we propose a CNN using Recurrence Plots (RPs) as sequence fingerprints as well as advanced RNNs treating magnetic sequences as fingerprints. We used the same real-world data in an indoor environment to build and fairly evaluate the proposed systems. Our findings show that RNNs clearly outperform the RP-based CNN, yet results in higher prediction latencies. Overall, promising positioning performances and smooth trajectory estimates are achieved for pedestrian path tracking due to approaching the indoor localization problem from a regression perspective.

Deep Learning for Water Quality Classification in Water Distribution Networks
Shahra E.Q., Wu W., Basurra S., Rizou S.
Maintaining high water quality is the main goal for water management planning and iterative evaluation of operating policies. For effective water monitoring, it is crucial to test a vast number of drinking water samples that is time-consuming and labour-intensive. The primary objective of this study is to determine, with high accuracy, the quality of drinking water samples by machine learning classification models while keeping computation time low. This paper aims to investigate and evaluate the performance of two supervised classification algorithms, including artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) for multiclass water classification. The evaluation uses the confusion matrix that includes all metrics ratios, such as true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative. Moreover, the overall accuracy and f1-score of the models are evaluated. The results demonstrate that ANN outperformed the SVM with an overall accuracy of 94% in comparison to SVM, which shows an overall accuracy of 89%.

Efficient Realistic Data Generation Framework Leveraging Deep Learning-Based Human Digitization
Symeonidis C., Nousi P., Tosidis P., Tsampazis K., Passalis N., Tefas A., Nikolaidis N.
The performance of supervised deep learning algorithms depends significantly on the scale, quality and diversity of the data used for their training. Collecting and manually annotating large amount of data can be both time-consuming and costly tasks to perform. In the case of tasks related to visual human-centric perception, the collection and distribution of such data may also face restrictions due to legislation regarding privacy. In addition, the design and testing of complex systems, e.g., robots, which often employ deep learning-based perception models, may face severe difficulties as even state-of-the-art methods trained on real and large-scale datasets cannot always perform adequately as they have not adapted to the visual differences between the virtual and the real world data. As an attempt to tackle and mitigate the effect of these issues, we present a method that automatically generates realistic synthetic data with annotations for a) person detection, b) face recognition, and c) human pose estimation. The proposed method takes as input real background images and populates them with human figures in various poses. Instead of using hand-made 3D human models, we propose the use of models generated through deep learning methods, further reducing the dataset creation costs, while maintaining a high level of realism. In addition, we provide open-source and easy to use tools that implement the proposed pipeline, allowing for generating highly-realistic synthetic datasets for a variety of tasks. A benchmarking and evaluation in the corresponding tasks shows that synthetic data can be effectively used as a supplement to real data.

A Novel CNN-LSTM Hybrid Architecture for the Recognition of Human Activities
Stylianou-Nikolaidou S., Vernikos I., Mathe E., Spyrou E., Mylonas P.
The problem of human activity recognition (HAR) has been increasingly attracting the efforts of the research community, having several applications. In this paper we propose a multi-modal approach addressing the task of video-based HAR. Our approach uses three modalities, i.e., raw RGB video data, depth sequences and 3D skeletal motion data. The latter are transformed into a 2D image representation into the spectral domain. In order to extract spatio-temporal features from the available data, we propose a novel hybrid deep neural network architecture that combines a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) network. We focus on the tasks of recognition of activities of daily living (ADLs) and medical conditions and we evaluate our approach using two challenging datasets.

Toward an Augmented and Explainable Machine Learning Approach for Classification of Defective Nanomaterial Patches
Ieracitano C., Mammone N., Paviglianiti A., Morabito F.C.
Electrospinning is a manufacturing technique used to produce nanofibers for engineering applications. This process depends on several control parameters (such as solution concentration, applied voltage, flow rate, tip-to-collector distance) whose variations during the experiments may lead to the formation of defective nanofibers (D-NF) along with non-defective nanofibers (ND-NF). D-NF present either with impurities or morphological defects that prevent their practical use in nanotechnology. In this context, here, a data augmentation based machine learning approach is proposed to classify Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images in two classes (i.e., D-NF vs. ND-NF). To this end, a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is developed to perform the binary classification task, achieving an accuracy rate up to 93.85%. Moreover, the explainability of the proposed CNN is also explored by means of an occlusion sensitivity analysis in order to investigate which area of the SEM image mostly contributes to the classification task. The achieved encouraging findings stimulate the use of the proposed framework in industrial applications.

A Multi-modal Audience Analysis System for Predicting Popularity of Online Videos
Vrochidis A., Dimitriou N., Krinidis S., Panagiotidis S., Parcharidis S., Tzovaras D.
Over the last decade, the volume of videos available on the web has increased exponentially. In order to help users cope with the ever-growing video volume, recommendation systems have emerged that can provide personalized suggestions to users based on their past preferences and relevant online metrics. However, such approaches require user profiling, which raises privacy issues while often providing delayed suggestions as various metrics have to be firstly collected such as ratings and number of views. In this paper, we propose a system specifically targeting video content generated in a conference event, where a series of talks and presentations are held and a separate video for each is recorded. Through audience analysis, our system is able to predict the online views of each video and thus recommend the most popular videos to users. This way, online users don’t have to search through all the videos of a conference event thus saving time while not missing the most impactful videos. The proposed system employs several complementary techniques for audience analysis based on video and audio streams. Experimental evaluation of real data demonstrates the potential of the proposed approach.
Found
Total publications
66
Total citations
655
Citations per publication
9.92
Average publications per year
4.71
Average coauthors
8.03
Publications years
2012-2025 (14 years)
h-index
16
i10-index
29
m-index
1.14
o-index
21
g-index
19
w-index
2
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
i10-index
The number of the author's publications that received at least 10 links each.
m-index
The researcher's m-index is numerically equal to the ratio of his h-index to the number of years that have passed since the first publication.
o-index
The geometric mean of the h-index and the number of citations of the most cited article of the scientist.
g-index
For a given set of articles, sorted in descending order of the number of citations that these articles received, the g-index is the largest number such that the g most cited articles received (in total) at least g2 citations.
w-index
If w articles of a researcher have at least 10w citations each and other publications are less than 10(w+1) citations, then the researcher's w-index is equal to w.
Top-100
Fields of science
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 33, 50%
General Chemistry
33 publications, 50%
|
Catalysis
|
Catalysis, 19, 28.79%
Catalysis
19 publications, 28.79%
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 13, 19.7%
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
13 publications, 19.7%
|
Computer Science Applications
|
Computer Science Applications, 12, 18.18%
Computer Science Applications
12 publications, 18.18%
|
Modeling and Simulation
|
Modeling and Simulation, 12, 18.18%
Modeling and Simulation
12 publications, 18.18%
|
General Chemical Engineering
|
General Chemical Engineering, 8, 12.12%
General Chemical Engineering
8 publications, 12.12%
|
Condensed Matter Physics
|
Condensed Matter Physics, 8, 12.12%
Condensed Matter Physics
8 publications, 12.12%
|
General Physics and Astronomy
|
General Physics and Astronomy, 7, 10.61%
General Physics and Astronomy
7 publications, 10.61%
|
Inorganic Chemistry
|
Inorganic Chemistry, 6, 9.09%
Inorganic Chemistry
6 publications, 9.09%
|
Process Chemistry and Technology
|
Process Chemistry and Technology, 6, 9.09%
Process Chemistry and Technology
6 publications, 9.09%
|
General Materials Science
|
General Materials Science, 6, 9.09%
General Materials Science
6 publications, 9.09%
|
Materials Chemistry
|
Materials Chemistry, 5, 7.58%
Materials Chemistry
5 publications, 7.58%
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 5, 7.58%
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
5 publications, 7.58%
|
Surfaces and Interfaces
|
Surfaces and Interfaces, 5, 7.58%
Surfaces and Interfaces
5 publications, 7.58%
|
Metals and Alloys
|
Metals and Alloys, 3, 4.55%
Metals and Alloys
3 publications, 4.55%
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 3, 4.55%
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
3 publications, 4.55%
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 2, 3.03%
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
2 publications, 3.03%
|
General Medicine
|
General Medicine, 2, 3.03%
General Medicine
2 publications, 3.03%
|
Biochemistry
|
Biochemistry, 1, 1.52%
Biochemistry
1 publication, 1.52%
|
Multidisciplinary
|
Multidisciplinary, 1, 1.52%
Multidisciplinary
1 publication, 1.52%
|
Mechanical Engineering
|
Mechanical Engineering, 1, 1.52%
Mechanical Engineering
1 publication, 1.52%
|
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
|
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 1, 1.52%
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
1 publication, 1.52%
|
Mechanics of Materials
|
Mechanics of Materials, 1, 1.52%
Mechanics of Materials
1 publication, 1.52%
|
Fuel Technology
|
Fuel Technology, 1, 1.52%
Fuel Technology
1 publication, 1.52%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Journals
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
Kinetics and Catalysis
12 publications, 18.18%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
7 publications, 10.61%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
6 publications, 9.09%
|
|
Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry
3 publications, 4.55%
|
|
Catalysts
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Molecular Catalysis
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Journal of Structural Chemistry
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Crystals
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
International Journal of Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Inorganics
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Glycobiology
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
MATEC Web of Conferences
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Intermetallics
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Nanomaterials
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Solid Fuel Chemistry
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Russian Chemical Bulletin
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Doklady Chemistry
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Russian Journal of Coordination Chemistry/Koordinatsionnaya Khimiya
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Russian Journal of General Chemistry
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Procedia Engineering
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Nano-Structures and Nano-Objects
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Petroleum Chemistry
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Data in Brief
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Журнал структурной химии
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Journal of microbiology epidemiology immunobiology
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Show all (2 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Kinetics and Catalysis
51 citations, 7.76%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
42 citations, 6.39%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
30 citations, 4.57%
|
|
Russian Chemical Reviews
30 citations, 4.57%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
29 citations, 4.41%
|
|
Catalysts
23 citations, 3.5%
|
|
Russian Chemical Bulletin
22 citations, 3.35%
|
|
Crystals
17 citations, 2.59%
|
|
Catalysis in Industry
15 citations, 2.28%
|
|
ACS Catalysis
12 citations, 1.83%
|
|
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
12 citations, 1.83%
|
|
Kataliz v promyshlennosti
12 citations, 1.83%
|
|
Journal of Catalysis
11 citations, 1.67%
|
|
Nanomaterials
10 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Journal of Structural Chemistry
10 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Molecular Catalysis
9 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Applied Catalysis A: General
9 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Inorganics
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
ChemCatChem
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Russian Journal of Coordination Chemistry/Koordinatsionnaya Khimiya
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Russian Journal of General Chemistry
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Petroleum Chemistry
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
International Journal of Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Molecules
7 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis
7 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
7 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry Communication
7 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Nano-Structures and Nano-Objects
6 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Журнал неорганической химии
6 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Industrial laboratory Diagnostics of materials
6 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Magnetic Resonance
6 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Diamond and Related Materials
5 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Journal not defined
|
Journal not defined, 4, 0.61%
Journal not defined
4 citations, 0.61%
|
Surfaces and Interfaces
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Doklady Chemistry
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Координационная химия
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Доклады Российской академии наук Химия науки о материалах
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Nanoscale
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Materials Letters
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Inorganica Chimica Acta
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Catalysis Letters
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
AICHE Journal
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Applied Clay Science
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Energy & Fuels
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Science
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Fuel
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Catalysis Communications
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Нефтехимия
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Nanoparticle Research
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Viruses
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Catalysis Science and Technology
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Nanoscale Horizons
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Intermetallics
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Solid Fuel Chemistry
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
ChemPhysChem
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Topics in Catalysis
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Chem Catalysis
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Кинетика и катализ
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention (Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika)
2 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Materials Horizons
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Russian Physics Journal
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
RSC Advances
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Nature Communications
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Materials Transactions
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Chemical Papers
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Petroleum Science
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
BMJ Open
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Glycobiology
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Metals
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
JETP Letters
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii (Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding)
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
ACS Applied Energy Materials
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Fuel Processing Technology
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Luminescence
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Refractories and Industrial Ceramics
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishers
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
27 publications, 40.91%
|
|
Elsevier
14 publications, 21.21%
|
|
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
7 publications, 10.61%
|
|
MDPI
6 publications, 9.09%
|
|
Springer Nature
3 publications, 4.55%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
NIIC SB RAS
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Central Research Institute for Epidemiology
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Organizations from articles
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
31 publications, 46.97%
|
|
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
28 publications, 42.42%
|
|
![]() Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
22 publications, 33.33%
|
|
Institute of Problems of Hydrocarbon Processing of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
19 publications, 28.79%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
10 publications, 15.15%
|
|
Omsk State Technical University
8 publications, 12.12%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 5, 7.58%
Organization not defined
5 publications, 7.58%
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
4 publications, 6.06%
|
|
Federal Research Center of Problem of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry RAS
4 publications, 6.06%
|
|
Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
3 publications, 4.55%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center" of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
National University of Oil and Gas «Gubkin University»
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Omsk Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Åbo Akademi University
2 publications, 3.03%
|
|
Institute of Structural Macrokinetics and Materials Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Novosibirsk State University
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Vienna University of Technology
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society
1 publication, 1.52%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Countries from articles
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 62, 93.94%
Russia
62 publications, 93.94%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 7, 10.61%
Country not defined
7 publications, 10.61%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 3.03%
Finland
2 publications, 3.03%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 1.52%
Germany
1 publication, 1.52%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 1.52%
Austria
1 publication, 1.52%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 1.52%
Denmark
1 publication, 1.52%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Citing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
78 citations, 11.91%
|
|
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
56 citations, 8.55%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 45, 6.87%
Organization not defined
45 citations, 6.87%
|
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
29 citations, 4.43%
|
|
Institute of Problems of Hydrocarbon Processing of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
20 citations, 3.05%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
18 citations, 2.75%
|
|
Omsk State Technical University
13 citations, 1.98%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
12 citations, 1.83%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
National University of Oil and Gas «Gubkin University»
8 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
7 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Federal Research Center of Problem of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry RAS
6 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Åbo Akademi University
6 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Institute of Structural Macrokinetics and Materials Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.76%
|
|
University of Tyumen
5 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
5 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center" of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Saint-Petersburg Pasteur Institute
5 citations, 0.76%
|
|
National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Novosibirsk State University
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Irkutsk State University
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Kazan State Medical University
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Tsinghua University
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Shihezi University
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
University College London
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Warsaw University of Technology
3 citations, 0.46%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis RAS
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
I. V. Grebenshchikov Institute of Silicate Chemistry of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Tomography Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Institute of Spectroscopy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Ural Federal University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Vyatka State University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Tambov State Technical University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Omsk Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Gabrichevsky Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Zhejiang University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Fudan University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Sichuan University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University of Lorraine
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Fuzhou University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Beijing University of Technology
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Beijing University of Chemical Technology
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Henan Normal University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Taiyuan University of Technology
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University of Warwick
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University of Manchester
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Southwest Petroleum University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Northwest University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Chungnam National University
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Vienna University of Technology
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University of Sheffield
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Institute of Catalysis and Petrochemistry
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University of South Carolina
2 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
G.A. Krestov Institute of Solution Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Institute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Osipyan Institute of Solid State Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
ITMO University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Siberian Federal University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
South Ural State University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Institute of Immunology and Physiology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Kazan National Research Technological University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
MIREA — Russian Technological University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Novosibirsk State Technical University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Southwest State University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
N. F. Gamaleya National Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Ural State Medical University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Al Farabi Kazakh National University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Almaty Technological University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
South Ural State Medical University
1 citation, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Citing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 198, 30.23%
Russia
198 citations, 30.23%
|
China
|
China, 64, 9.77%
China
64 citations, 9.77%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 55, 8.4%
Country not defined
55 citations, 8.4%
|
USA
|
USA, 20, 3.05%
USA
20 citations, 3.05%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 9, 1.37%
Germany
9 citations, 1.37%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 8, 1.22%
United Kingdom
8 citations, 1.22%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 8, 1.22%
Spain
8 citations, 1.22%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 7, 1.07%
Finland
7 citations, 1.07%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 7, 1.07%
Japan
7 citations, 1.07%
|
France
|
France, 6, 0.92%
France
6 citations, 0.92%
|
India
|
India, 5, 0.76%
India
5 citations, 0.76%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.76%
Republic of Korea
5 citations, 0.76%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.46%
Poland
3 citations, 0.46%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 0.31%
Kazakhstan
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 0.31%
Australia
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.31%
Austria
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.31%
Belgium
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.31%
Brazil
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.31%
Vietnam
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.31%
Denmark
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.31%
Iran
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.31%
Italy
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.31%
Mexico
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.31%
Saudi Arabia
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.31%
Czech Republic
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.31%
Sweden
2 citations, 0.31%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.31%
South Africa
2 citations, 0.31%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.15%
Azerbaijan
1 citation, 0.15%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.15%
Argentina
1 citation, 0.15%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.15%
Egypt
1 citation, 0.15%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.15%
Israel
1 citation, 0.15%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.15%
Nigeria
1 citation, 0.15%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.15%
Netherlands
1 citation, 0.15%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.15%
Slovenia
1 citation, 0.15%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.15%
Thailand
1 citation, 0.15%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.15%
Philippines
1 citation, 0.15%
|
Show all (6 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
This section displays the profiles of scientists registered on the platform. To display the full list, invite your colleagues to register.