volume 4 issue 6 pages 284-290

Development of a new method for the analysis of sphinganine and sphingosine in urine and tissues

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2006-05-30
SJR
CiteScore
Impact factor
ISSN10569014, 15227189
Toxicology
Abstract
The fumonisins are inhibitors of de novo sphingolipid biosynthesis in vitro and in vivo and thus possibly interfere with the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and neoplastic transformation. In addition, the ratio of free sphinganine (Sa) to free sphingosine (So) has been proposed as a marker of exposure for animals or humans consuming feed or food contaminated by these toxins. A method to analyze these sphingolipid bases has been proposed [Merrill et al., 1988: Anal Biochem 171:373-381; Riley et al., 1994a: JAOAC 77:533-540] but involves numerous steps and consequently is not ideally suited to the analysis of large numbers of samples, as is often required in epidemiological studies. A new method was therefore developed for the analysis of the Sa/So ratio in tissues as well as human and rat urine. Briefly, the method involves isolation of exfoliated cells from as little as 0.5 ml of rat urine or 2 ml of human urine followed by a rapid and efficient extraction of sphingolipid bases in ethyl acetate, an optimized derivatization step with o-phthaldialdehyde and a high-pressure liquid chromatography separation on a 250 mm x 4.6 mm. 5 microns Kromasil C18 column, with a 4-step phosphate buffer/methanol gradient. Fluorescence was monitored at 340 nm excitation, 455 nm emission, and retention times for So, Sa, and C-20 Sa were about 11, 14, and 22 min, respectively. The method was adapted to tissue analysis by partially digesting approximately 30 mg tissue with trypsin to permit isolation of a cell pellet before extraction of the sphingolipids as described above. The method was applied to the analysis of So and Sa in urines and tissues of fumonisin B1 (FB1) treated and untreated male BDIV rats. The Sa/So ratio in urine of untreated rats varied from 0.1 to 0.7, and for treated rats (between 1-5 mg FB1/kg body weight daily by gavage), the ratio was between 1.2-10. In kidney, the ratio was 0.1 in control rats and varied from 4 to 10.3 in treated rats. In human urine, measurements could easily be made in 2 ml of urine in females, but in males much larger volumes were required due to the low levels of sphingolipid bases.
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Food Additives & Contaminants
4 publications, 11.76%
Toxicon
3 publications, 8.82%
Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences and Applications
2 publications, 5.88%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
2 publications, 5.88%
Chemico-Biological Interactions
2 publications, 5.88%
Food Additives and Contaminants - Part A Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment
2 publications, 5.88%
World Mycotoxin Journal
2 publications, 5.88%
Methods in Enzymology
2 publications, 5.88%
Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
1 publication, 2.94%
Food and Chemical Toxicology
1 publication, 2.94%
Environmental Health Perspectives
1 publication, 2.94%
Journal of Nutrition
1 publication, 2.94%
Analytical Biochemistry
1 publication, 2.94%
Journal of Chromatography A
1 publication, 2.94%
Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
1 publication, 2.94%
Food Science and Technology International
1 publication, 2.94%
Molecules
1 publication, 2.94%
Cereal Research Communications
1 publication, 2.94%
Archives of Pharmacal Research
1 publication, 2.94%
Natural Toxins
1 publication, 2.94%
Biomarkers
1 publication, 2.94%
Carcinogenesis
1 publication, 2.94%
British Journal of Nutrition
1 publication, 2.94%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Elsevier
14 publications, 41.18%
Taylor & Francis
7 publications, 20.59%
MDPI
3 publications, 8.82%
Wageningen Academic Publishers
2 publications, 5.88%
Environmental Health Perspectives
1 publication, 2.94%
American Society for Nutrition
1 publication, 2.94%
SAGE
1 publication, 2.94%
Gabonatermesztesi Kutato Kozhasznu Tarsasag/Cereal Research Non-Profit Company
1 publication, 2.94%
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
1 publication, 2.94%
Wiley
1 publication, 2.94%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 2.94%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 2.94%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
34
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Castegnaro M. et al. Development of a new method for the analysis of sphinganine and sphingosine in urine and tissues // Natural Toxins. 2006. Vol. 4. No. 6. pp. 284-290.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Castegnaro M., Garren L., Gaucher I., Wild C. P. Development of a new method for the analysis of sphinganine and sphingosine in urine and tissues // Natural Toxins. 2006. Vol. 4. No. 6. pp. 284-290.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1002/(sici)(1996)4:6<284::aid-nt6>3.0.co;2-z
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)(1996)4:6<284::aid-nt6>3.0.co;2-z
TI - Development of a new method for the analysis of sphinganine and sphingosine in urine and tissues
T2 - Natural Toxins
AU - Castegnaro, M.
AU - Garren, L.
AU - Gaucher, I
AU - Wild, C. P.
PY - 2006
DA - 2006/05/30
PB - Wiley
SP - 284-290
IS - 6
VL - 4
PMID - 9029554
SN - 1056-9014
SN - 1522-7189
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2006_Castegnaro,
author = {M. Castegnaro and L. Garren and I Gaucher and C. P. Wild},
title = {Development of a new method for the analysis of sphinganine and sphingosine in urine and tissues},
journal = {Natural Toxins},
year = {2006},
volume = {4},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)(1996)4:6<284::aid-nt6>3.0.co;2-z},
number = {6},
pages = {284--290},
doi = {10.1002/(sici)(1996)4:6<284::aid-nt6>3.0.co;2-z}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Castegnaro, M., et al. “Development of a new method for the analysis of sphinganine and sphingosine in urine and tissues.” Natural Toxins, vol. 4, no. 6, May. 2006, pp. 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)(1996)4:6<284::aid-nt6>3.0.co;2-z.