Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences and Applications
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences and Applications
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences and Applications
(24340 citations)

Journal of Chromatography A
(16161 citations)

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
(10023 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Utrecht University
(96 publications)

Kyushu University
(90 publications)

Charles University
(75 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1136
Q2

Imputation of missing clock times – application to procalcitonin concentration time course after birth
Bokor A.J., Holford N., Hannam J.A.
Abstract
The time course of biomarkers (e.g., acute phase proteins) are typically described using days relative to events of interest, such as surgery or birth, without specifying the sample time. This limits their use as they may change rapidly during a single day. We investigated strategies to impute missing clock times, using procalcitonin for population modelling as the motivating example. 1275 procalcitonin concentrations from 282 neonates were available with dates but not sample times (Scenario 0). Missing clock times were imputed using a random uniform distribution under three scenarios: (1) minimum sampling intervals (8–12 h); (2) procalcitonin concentrations increase for postnatal days 0–1 then decrease; (3) standard sampling practice at the study hospital. Unique datasets (n = 100) were created with scenario-specific imputed clock times. Procalcitonin was modelled for each scenario using the same non-linear mixed effects model using NONMEM. Scenarios were evaluated by the NONMEM objective function value compared to Scenario 0 (∆OFV) and with visual predictive checks. Scenario 3, based on standard sampling practice at the study hospital, was the best imputation procedure with an improved objective function value compared to Scenario 0 (∆OFV: -62.6). Scenario 3 showed a shorter lag time between the birth event and the procalcitonin concentration increase (average: 12.0 h, 95% interval: 9.7 to 14.3 h) compared to other scenarios (averages: 15.3 to 18.7 h). A methodology for selecting imputation strategies for clock times was developed. This may be applied to other problems where clock times are missing.
Q2

Sampling from covariate distribution may not always be necessary in PK/PD simulations: illustrative examples with antibiotics
Liu F., Cheng Z., Li S., Xie F.
Q2
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

The impact of misspecified covariate models on inclusion and omission bias when using fixed effects and full random effects models
Nyberg J., Jonsson E.N.
Q2
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Defining preclinical efficacy with the DNAPK inhibitor AZD7648 in combination with olaparib: a minimal systems pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model
DeJongh J., Cadogan E., Davies M., Ramos-Montoya A., Smith A., van Steeg T., Richards R.
Q2
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Reliability of in vitro data for the mechanistic prediction of brain extracellular fluid pharmacokinetics of P-glycoprotein substrates in vivo; are we scaling correctly?
van Valkengoed D.W., Hirasawa M., Rottschäfer V., de Lange E.C.
Abstract
Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles often do not resemble the PK within the central nervous system (CNS) because of blood–brain-border (BBB) processes, like active efflux by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Methods to predict CNS-PK are therefore desired. Here we investigate whether in vitro apparent permeability (Papp) and corrected efflux ratio (ERc) extracted from literature can be repurposed as input for the LeiCNS-PK3.4 physiologically-based PK model to confidently predict rat brain extracellular fluid (ECF) PK of P-gp substrates. Literature values of in vitro Caco-2, LLC-PK1-mdr1a/MDR1, and MDCKII-MDR1 cell line transport data were used to calculate P-gp efflux clearance (CLPgp). Subsequently, CLPgp was scaled from in vitro to in vivo through a relative expression factor (REF) based on P-gp expression differences. BrainECF PK was predicted well (within twofold error of the observed data) for 2 out of 4 P-gp substrates after short infusions and 3 out of 4 P-gp substrates after continuous infusions. Variability of in vitro parameters impacted both predicted rate and extent of drug distribution, reducing model applicability. Notably, use of transport data and in vitro P-gp expression obtained from a single study did not guarantee an accurate prediction; it often resulted in worse predictions than when using in vitro expression values reported by other labs. Overall, LeiCNS-PK3.4 shows promise in predicting brainECF PK, but this study highlights that the in vitro to in vivo translation is not yet robust. We conclude that more information is needed about context and drug dependency of in vitro data for robust brainECF PK predictions.
Q2

Quantifying natural amyloid plaque accumulation in the continuum of Alzheimer’s disease using ADNI
Elhefnawy M.E., Patson N., Mouksassi S., Pillai G., Shcherbinin S., Chigutsa E., Gueorguieva I.
Brain amyloid beta neuritic plaque accumulation is associated with an increased risk of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [Pfeil, J., et al. in Neurobiol Aging 106: 119–129, 2021]. Several studies estimate rates of change in amyloid plaque over time in clinically heterogeneous cohorts with different factors impacting amyloid plaque accumulation from ADNI and AIBL [Laccarino, L., et al. in Annals Clin and Trans Neurol 6: 1113 1120, 2019, Vos, S.J., et al. in Brain 138: 1327–1338, 2015, Lim, Y.Y., et al. in Alzheimer’s Dementia 9: 538-545, 2013], but there are no reports using non-linear mixed effect model for amyloid plaque progression over time similar to that existing of disease-modifying biomarkers for other diseases [Cook, S.F. and R.R. Bies in Current Pharmacol Rep 2: 221–230, 2016, Gueorguieva, I., et al. in Alzheimer’s Dementia 19: 2253–2264, 2023]. This study describes the natural progression of amyloid accumulation with population mean and between-participant variability for baseline and intrinsic progression rates quantified across the AD spectrum. 1340 ADNI participants were followed over a 10-year period with 18F-florbetapir PET scans used for amyloid plaque detection. Non-linear mixed effect with stepwise covariate modelling (scm) was used. Change in natural amyloid plaque levels over 10 year period followed an exponential growth model with an intrinsic rate of approx. 3 centiloid units/year. Age, gender, APOE4 genotype and disease stage were important factors on the baseline in the natural amyloid model. In APOE4 homozygous carriers mean baseline amyloid was increased compared to APOE4 non carriers. These results demonstrate natural progression of amyloid plaque in the continuum of AD.
Q2

Stronger together: a cross-SIG perspective on improving drug development
Fostvedt L., Zhou J., Kondic A.G., Androulakis I.P., Zhang T., Pryor M., Zhuang L., Elassaiss-Schaap J., Chan P., Moore H., Avedissian S.N., Tigh J., Goteti K., Thanneer N., Su J., et. al.
Q2
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

No QT interval prolongation effect of sepiapterin: a concentration-QTc analysis of pooled data from phase 1 and phase 3 studies in healthy volunteers and patients with phenylketonuria
Gao L., Hu Y., Smith N., Uvarov A., Peyret T., Gosselin N.H., Kong R.
Sepiapterin is an exogenously synthesized new chemical entity that is structurally equivalent to endogenous sepiapterin, a biological precursor of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), which is a cofactor for phenylalanine hydroxylase. Sepiapterin is being developed for the treatment of hyperphenylalaninemia in pediatric and adult patients with phenylketonuria (PKU). This study employed concentration-QT interval analysis to assess QT prolongation risk following sepiapterin treatment. Data from three phase 1 studies and one phase 3 study were pooled for this analysis. Pediatric and adult PKU patients ≥ 2 years received multiple doses at 60 mg/kg and adult healthy volunteers received a single or multiple doses at 20 or 60 mg/kg. Time-matched triplicate ECG measurements and plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected. Prespecified linear mixed models relating ΔQTcF to concentrations of sepiapterin and the major active circulating metabolite BH4 were developed for the analysis. The analysis demonstrated that there is no QTcF prolongation risk in patients with PKU following sepiapterin dosing at the highest therapeutic dose, 60 mg/kg/day. The final model showed a marginal but negligible QTcF reduction with increasing sepiapterin and BH4 concentrations. The effect on ΔQTcF was estimated to -2.72 [-3.72, -1.71] and − 1.25 [-2.75, 0.25] ms at mean baseline adjusted BH4 Cmax of 332 ng/mL (therapeutic exposure) and 675 ng/mL (supratherapeutic exposure) at dose 60 mg/kg, respectively, in PKU patients with food and in healthy volunteers with a high fat diet. Various covariates, such as clinical study ID, age, sex, food effect, race, body weight, and disease status, on QTcF interval were investigated and were found insignificant, except for food effect and age. This study concludes that there is no QTcF prolongation risk in patients with PKU following sepiapterin dosing up to 60 mg/kg/day, and BH4 and sepiapterin concentrations minimally affect ΔQTcF after adjustment for time, sex, and meal.
Q2

A physiologically-based quantitative systems pharmacology model for mechanistic understanding of the response to alogliptin and its application in patients with renal impairment
Shen C., Xie H., Jiang X., Wang L.
Alogliptin is a highly selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and primarily excreted as unchanged drug in the urine, and differences in clinical outcomes in renal impairment patients increase the risk of serious adverse reactions. In this study, we developed a comprehensive physiologically-based quantitative systematic pharmacology model of the alogliptin-glucose control system to predict plasma exposure and use glucose as a clinical endpoint to prospectively understand its therapeutic outcomes with varying renal function. Our model incorporates a PBPK model for alogliptin, DPP-4 activity described by receptor occupancy theory, and the crosstalk and feedback loops for GLP-1-GIP-glucagon, insulin, and glucose. Based on the optimization of renal function-dependent parameters, the model was extrapolated to different stages renal impairment patients. Ultimately our model adequately describes the pharmacokinetics of alogliptin, the progression of DPP-4 inhibition over time and the dynamics of the glucose control system components. The extrapolation results endorse the dose adjustment regimen of 12.5 mg once daily for moderate patients and 6.25 mg once daily for severe and ESRD patients, while providing additional reflections and insights. In clinical practice, our model could provide additional information on the in vivo fate of DPP4 inhibitors and key regulators of the glucose control system.
Q2

Do P-glycoprotein-mediated drug-drug interactions at the blood-brain barrier impact morphine brain distribution?
Gülave B., Lesmana A., de Lange E.C., van Hasselt J.C.
Abstract
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a key efflux transporter and may be involved in drug-drug interactions (DDIs) at the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which could lead to changes in central nervous system (CNS) drug exposure. Morphine is a P-gp substrate and therefore a potential victim drug for P-gp mediated DDIs. It is however unclear if P-gp inhibitors can induce clinically relevant changes in morphine CNS exposure. Here, we used a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-based approach to evaluate the potential impact of DDIs on BBB transport of morphine by clinically relevant P-gp inhibitor drugs.
The LeiCNS-PK3.0 PBPK model was used to simulate morphine distribution at the brain extracellular fluid (brainECF) for different clinical intravenous dosing regimens of morphine, alone or in combination with a P-gp inhibitor. We included 34 commonly used P-gp inhibitor drugs, with inhibitory constants and expected clinical P-gp inhibitor concentrations derived from literature. The DDI impact was evaluated by the change in brainECF exposure for morphine alone or in combination with different inhibitors. Our analysis demonstrated that P-gp inhibitors had a negligible effect on morphine brainECF exposure in the majority of simulated population, caused by low P-gp inhibition. Sensitivity analyses showed neither major effects of increasing the inhibitory concentration nor changing the inhibitory constant on morphine brainECF exposure. In conclusion, P-gp mediated DDIs on morphine BBB transport for the evaluated P-gp inhibitors are unlikely to induce meaningful changes in clinically relevant morphine CNS exposure. The developed CNS PBPK modeling approach provides a general approach for evaluating BBB transporter DDIs in humans.
Q2

Application of model-informed drug development (MIDD) for dose selection in regulatory submissions for drug approval in Japan
Sasaki T., Katsube T., Hayato S., Yamaguchi S., Tanaka J., Yoshimatsu H., Nakanishi Y., Kitamura A., Watase H., Suganami H., Matsuoka N., Hasegawa C.
Model-informed drug development (MIDD) is an approach to improve the efficiency of drug development. To promote awareness and application of MIDD in Japan, the Data Science Expert Committee of the Drug Evaluation Committee in the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association established a task force, which surveyed MIDD applications for approved products in Japan. This study aimed to reveal the trends and challenges in the use of MIDD by analyzing the survey results. A total of 322 cases approved in Japan between January 2020 and March 2022 as medical products were included in the survey. Modeling analysis was performed in approximately half of the cases (47.8% [154/322]) and formed a major basis for the selection or justification of dosage and administration in approximately one-fourth of the cases [24.2% (78/322)]. Modeling analysis/model-based dose selection was frequently conducted in cases involving monoclonal antibodies, first indication, orphan drugs, and multi-regional trials. Moreover, the survey results indicated that modeling analyses contributed to dose optimization throughout the developmental phases, including changing dose levels from phase II to phase III and dose adjustment in special populations. Japanese data were included in most cases in which modeling analysis was used for dosage selection. Thus, modelling analysis may also address ethnic factors introduced in the ICH E5 and/or E17 guidelines. In summary, this survey is useful for understanding the current status of MIDD use in Japan and for future drug development.
Q2

Novel endpoints based on tumor size ratio to support early clinical decision-making in oncology drug-development
Chakraborty S., Aggarwal K., Chowdhury M., Hamada I., Hu C., Kondic A., Mishra K., Paulucci D., Tiwari R., Appanna K.V., Balan M.M., Kumar A.
In oncology drug development, overall response rate (ORR) is commonly used as an early endpoint to assess the clinical benefits of new interventions; however, ORR benefit may not always translate into a long-term clinical benefit such as overall survival (OS). Most of the work on developing endpoints based on tumor growth dynamics relies on empirical validation, leading to a lack of generalizability of the endpoints across indications and therapeutic modalities. Additionally, many of these metrics are model-based and do not use data from all the patients. The objective of this work is to use longitudinal tumor size data and new lesion information (that is, the same information used by the ORR) to develop novel endpoints that can improve early clinical decision-making compared to the ORR. We investigate in this work multiple candidate novel endpoints based on tumor size ratio that utilize longitudinal tumor size data from all the patients regardless of their follow-up, rely only on tumor size and new lesion information, and are model-free. An extensive simulation study is conducted, exploring a wide spectrum of tumor size data and overall survival outcomes by modulating a variety of trial characteristics such as slow vs fast tumor growth, high vs low drug efficacy rates, variability in patients’ responses, variations in the number of patients, follow-up periods, new lesion rates and survival curve shapes. The proposed novel endpoints based on tumor size ratio consistently outperform the ORR by having a comparable or higher correlation with the OS. Further, the novel endpoints exhibit superior accuracy compared to the ORR in predicting the long-term OS benefit. Retrospective empirical validation on BMS clinical trials confirms our simulation findings. These findings suggest that the tumor size ratio-based endpoints could replace ORR for early clinical decision-making in oncology drug development.
Q2

Translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling of the anti-ADAMTS-5 NANOBODY® (M6495) using the neo-epitope ARGS as a biomarker
Pereira J.N., Ottevaere I., Serruys B., Guehring H., Ladel C., Lindemann S.
M6495 is a first-in-class NANOBODY® molecule and an inhibitor of ADAMTS-5, with the potential to be a disease modifying osteoarthritis drug. In order to investigate the PK/PD (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) properties of M6495, a single dose study was performed in cynomolgus monkeys with doses up to 6 mg/kg, with the goal of understanding the PK/PD properties of M6495. The neo-epitope ARGS (Alanine-Arginine-Glycine-Serine) generated by cleavage of aggrecan by ADAMTS-5 was used as a target-engagement biomarker. A long-lasting dose-dependent decrease in serum ARGS could be observed after a single dose of M6495 in cynomolgus monkeys. The serum biomarker ARGS decreased to levels below the limit of quantification of the assay in animals which received doses of M6495 of 6 mg/kg and higher, indicating a strong inhibition of ADAMTS-5. Data from the single-dose PK/PD study was combined with data from a multiple dose study, and a non-linear mixed effects model was used to explore the relationship between plasma concentrations of M6495 and the reduction of serum ARGS. The model was subsequently used to inform the clinical phase 1 study design and was successful in predicting the human clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of M6495. In addition to having enabled a Phase 1 trial with M6495, this is the first PK/PD model describing the pharmacodynamics of the neo-epitope ARGS after ADAMTS5 inhibition. It is expected that in the future, this model can be used or adapted to explore the PK/PD relationship between M6495 serum concentrations and the ARGS serum biomarker.
Q2

QSP modeling of a transiently inactivating antibody-drug conjugate highlights benefit of short antibody half life
Khera E., Dharmarajan L., Hainzl D., Engelhardt V., Vostiarova H., Davis J., Ebel N., Wuersch K., Romanet V., Sharaby S., Kearns J.D.
Antibody drug conjugates (ADC) are a promising class of oncology therapeutics consisting of an antibody conjugated to a payload via a linker. DYP688 is a novel ADC comprising of a signaling protein inhibitor payload (FR900359) that undergoes unique on-antibody inactivation in plasma, resulting in complex pharmacology. To assess the impact of FR inactivation on DYP688 pharmacology and clinical developability, we performed translational modeling of preclinical PK and tumor growth inhibition (TGI) data, accompanied by mechanistic Krogh cylinder tumor modeling. Using a PK-TGI model, we identified a composite exposure-above-tumorostatic concentration (AUCTSC) metric as the PK-driver of efficacy. To underpin the mechanisms behind AUCTSC as the driver of efficacy, we performed quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling of DYP688 intratumoral pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Through exploratory simulations, we show that by deviating from canonical ADC design dogma, DYP688 has optimal FR900359 activity despite its transient inactivation. Finally, we performed the successful preclinical to clinical translation of DYP688 PK, including the payload inactivation kinetics, evidenced by good agreement of the predicted PK to the observed interim clinical PK. Overall, this work highlights early quantitative pharmacokinetics as a missing link in the ADC design-developability chasm.
Q2

A PopPBPK-RL approach for precision dosing of benazepril in renal impaired patients
Vigueras G., Muñoz-Gil L., Reinisch V., Pinto J.T.
Current treatment recommendations mainly rely on rule-based protocols defined from evidence-based clinical guidelines, which are difficult to adapt for high-risk patients such as those with renal impairment. Consequently, unsuccessful therapies and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions are common. Within the context of personalized medicine, that tries to deliver the right treatment dose to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity, the concept of model-informed precision dosing proposes the use of mechanistic models, like physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, to predict drug regimes outcomes. Nonetheless, PBPK models have limited capability when computing patients’ centric optimized drug doses. Consequently, reinforcement learning (RL) has been previously used to personalize drug dosage. In this work we propose the first PBPK and RL-based precision dosing system for an orally taken drug (benazepril) considering a virtual population of patients with renal disease. Population based PBPK modeling is used in combination with RL for obtaining patient tailored dose regimes. We also perform patient stratification and feature selection to better handle dose tailoring problems. Based on patients’ characteristics with best predictive capabilities, benazepril dose regimes are obtained for a population with features’ diversity. Obtained regimes are evaluated based on PK parameters considered. Results show that the proof-of-concept approach herein is capable of learning good dosing regimes for most patients. The use of a PopPBPK model allowed to account for intervariability of patient characteristics and be more inclusive considering also non-frequent patients. Impact analysis of patients’ features reveals that renal impairment is the main driver affecting RL capabilities.
Top-100
Citing journals
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
|
Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences and Applications
24340 citations, 9.54%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography A
16161 citations, 6.33%
|
|
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
10023 citations, 3.93%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
9215 citations, 3.61%
|
|
Analytica Chimica Acta
4768 citations, 1.87%
|
|
Chromatographia
4346 citations, 1.7%
|
|
Biomedical Chromatography
4337 citations, 1.7%
|
|
Electrophoresis
4075 citations, 1.6%
|
|
Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies
3102 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Journal of Separation Science
2584 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography Library
2570 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Analytical Biochemistry
2491 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Analytical Chemistry
2437 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Journal of Liquid Chromatography
2388 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
2088 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Analytical Letters
1916 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
1809 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
1626 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Journal of Mass Spectrometry
1517 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Clinica Chimica Acta
1341 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Analytical Sciences
1234 citations, 0.48%
|
|
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
1202 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
1185 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Handbook of Analytical Separations
1136 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Talanta
1131 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Forensic Science International
975 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
938 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
934 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Analytical Methods
920 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Clinical Chemistry
876 citations, 0.34%
|
|
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
808 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Biochemical Pharmacology
802 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Electroanalysis
792 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Bioanalysis
742 citations, 0.29%
|
|
TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
719 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Microchemical Journal
696 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
696 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
695 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Chromatographic Science
686 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Food Chemistry
667 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Chirality
657 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
628 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Lipid Research
614 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Analytical Chemistry
603 citations, 0.24%
|
|
The Analyst
601 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Life Sciences
596 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Xenobiotica
573 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods
552 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology
551 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
551 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Molecules
543 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition
503 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Mass Spectrometry Reviews
484 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of High Resolution Chromatography
480 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
473 citations, 0.19%
|
|
PLoS ONE
468 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Lipids
456 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Neurochemistry
453 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Drug Testing and Analysis
446 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
440 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
440 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Brain Research
430 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
429 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Microchimica Acta
426 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
421 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
411 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Methods in Enzymology
406 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Clinical Biochemistry
405 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Nutrition
403 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry
392 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Planar Chromatography - Modern TLC
392 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
380 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
379 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
371 citations, 0.15%
|
|
European Journal of Pharmacology
362 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
351 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
347 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal
345 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
339 citations, 0.13%
|
|
RSC Advances
335 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry
335 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
334 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
330 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
328 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
316 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Food and Chemical Toxicology
312 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Scientific Reports
310 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
307 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Luminescence
304 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Separation and Purification Technology
293 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Il Farmaco
293 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Amino Acids
290 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
286 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
286 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Archives of Pharmacal Research
285 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Steroids
281 citations, 0.11%
|
|
British Journal of Pharmacology
279 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
271 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Chemosphere
268 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
267 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
Citing publishers
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
|
|
Elsevier
119172 citations, 46.69%
|
|
Wiley
37647 citations, 14.75%
|
|
Springer Nature
22905 citations, 8.97%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
16516 citations, 6.47%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
7015 citations, 2.75%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3856 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3284 citations, 1.29%
|
|
MDPI
2915 citations, 1.14%
|
|
SAGE
1982 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Oxford University Press
1922 citations, 0.75%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
1633 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry
1363 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1041 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1026 citations, 0.4%
|
|
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
970 citations, 0.38%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
779 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
738 citations, 0.29%
|
|
American Physiological Society
711 citations, 0.28%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
711 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
641 citations, 0.25%
|
|
605 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
597 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
580 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
567 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
544 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
501 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
415 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IOP Publishing
377 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
365 citations, 0.14%
|
|
BMJ
333 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
302 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
292 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
280 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
238 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Society of Forensic Toxicologists
238 citations, 0.09%
|
|
S. Karger AG
236 citations, 0.09%
|
|
King Saud University
230 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
219 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
188 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
171 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
166 citations, 0.07%
|
|
150 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
137 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
136 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
132 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Animal Science
127 citations, 0.05%
|
|
122 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Microbiology Society
119 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
117 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AIP Publishing
117 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
107 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science Alert
104 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
103 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Portland Press
103 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
103 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
96 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
92 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Veterinary Medical Association
87 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SciELO
85 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
83 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Annual Reviews
83 citations, 0.03%
|
|
A and V Publications
77 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
74 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
72 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
72 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
64 citations, 0.03%
|
|
European Journal of Chemistry
63 citations, 0.02%
|
|
MANUSCRIPT TECHNOMEDIA LLP
56 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AOAC International
56 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
55 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
55 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
53 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
53 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
51 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
50 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Food Protection
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering
46 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
46 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Organic Chemistry & Biochemistry
46 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
46 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Royal Society
45 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
44 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fundacao Editora UNESP
42 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
42 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
41 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Society for Chromatographic Sciences
41 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific
40 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
39 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Academic Publications Japan
39 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Faculty of Pharmacy Cairo University
39 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
38 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Asian Journal of Chemistry
37 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
36 citations, 0.01%
|
|
European Society for Artificial Organs (ESAO)
36 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japanese Society for Food Hygiene and Safety
35 citations, 0.01%
|
|
33 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
33 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Forensic Science Society
33 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
33 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IOS Press
32 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
Utrecht University
96 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Kyushu University
90 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Charles University
75 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
74 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Lund University
68 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
68 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Alberta
64 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Nagoya University
62 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Toronto
55 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Ghent University
54 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
54 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Tokyo
54 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Münster
53 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Okayama University
53 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Hoffmann-La Roche
52 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
51 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of British Columbia
51 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Oslo
48 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Netherlands Cancer Institute
48 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Food and Drug Administration
47 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
45 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
45 publications, 0.37%
|
|
McGill University
44 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
44 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
43 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Minnesota
43 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Queensland
41 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Osaka University
41 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Leiden University
41 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Sydney
39 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
39 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Uppsala University
38 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Tennessee
38 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
36 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Arizona
36 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
35 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Purdue University
35 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Vienna
35 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
34 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
34 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Cornell University
33 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Istituto Superiore di Sanità
33 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Showa University
32 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
32 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Regina Elena National Cancer Institute
31 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Washington
31 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
31 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Michigan
31 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Bologna
30 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Pavia
30 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Ohio State University
30 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Tohoku University
30 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
30 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Tübingen
29 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
29 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Milan
29 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
29 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Stanford University
28 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Harvard University
28 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Göttingen
28 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Helsinki
27 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
27 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Saarland University
27 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
27 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Verona
26 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Fukuoka University
26 publications, 0.21%
|
|
National University of Singapore
25 publications, 0.21%
|
|
National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine
25 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
25 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Florida
25 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Yale University
24 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
24 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Bayreuth
23 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Nagoya City University
23 publications, 0.19%
|
|
National Cancer Institute
23 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Center
23 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
22 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Liverpool
22 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Iowa State University
22 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Pretoria
22 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Kyoto University
22 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
22 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Wayne State University
22 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
22 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Kitasato University
22 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Skåne University Hospital
21 publications, 0.17%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
21 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Melbourne
21 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Hannover Medical School
21 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
21 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Linköping University Hospital
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Hokkaido University
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Groningen
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Hiroshima University
20 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Publishing countries
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 2969, 24.35%
USA
2969 publications, 24.35%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1489, 12.21%
Japan
1489 publications, 12.21%
|
France
|
France, 985, 8.08%
France
985 publications, 8.08%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 867, 7.11%
Germany
867 publications, 7.11%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 778, 6.38%
United Kingdom
778 publications, 6.38%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 623, 5.11%
Netherlands
623 publications, 5.11%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 551, 4.52%
Italy
551 publications, 4.52%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 458, 3.76%
Canada
458 publications, 3.76%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 414, 3.39%
Sweden
414 publications, 3.39%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 335, 2.75%
Australia
335 publications, 2.75%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 231, 1.89%
Spain
231 publications, 1.89%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 219, 1.8%
Switzerland
219 publications, 1.8%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 213, 1.75%
Czech Republic
213 publications, 1.75%
|
China
|
China, 190, 1.56%
China
190 publications, 1.56%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 190, 1.56%
Belgium
190 publications, 1.56%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 136, 1.12%
Czechoslovakia
136 publications, 1.12%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 124, 1.02%
Denmark
124 publications, 1.02%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 112, 0.92%
Austria
112 publications, 0.92%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 101, 0.83%
Finland
101 publications, 0.83%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 94, 0.77%
Norway
94 publications, 0.77%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 77, 0.63%
Republic of Korea
77 publications, 0.63%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 74, 0.61%
South Africa
74 publications, 0.61%
|
India
|
India, 64, 0.52%
India
64 publications, 0.52%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 56, 0.46%
Hungary
56 publications, 0.46%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 47, 0.39%
New Zealand
47 publications, 0.39%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 46, 0.38%
Russia
46 publications, 0.38%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 42, 0.34%
Poland
42 publications, 0.34%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 37, 0.3%
Slovakia
37 publications, 0.3%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 35, 0.29%
Ireland
35 publications, 0.29%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 34, 0.28%
Greece
34 publications, 0.28%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 31, 0.25%
Brazil
31 publications, 0.25%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 31, 0.25%
Israel
31 publications, 0.25%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 28, 0.23%
Singapore
28 publications, 0.23%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 27, 0.22%
USSR
27 publications, 0.22%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 21, 0.17%
Turkey
21 publications, 0.17%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 20, 0.16%
Malaysia
20 publications, 0.16%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 17, 0.14%
Mexico
17 publications, 0.14%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 16, 0.13%
Cuba
16 publications, 0.13%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 16, 0.13%
Thailand
16 publications, 0.13%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 15, 0.12%
Portugal
15 publications, 0.12%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 14, 0.11%
Slovenia
14 publications, 0.11%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 13, 0.11%
Bulgaria
13 publications, 0.11%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 10, 0.08%
Argentina
10 publications, 0.08%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 10, 0.08%
Saudi Arabia
10 publications, 0.08%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 8, 0.07%
Croatia
8 publications, 0.07%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 8, 0.07%
Chile
8 publications, 0.07%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 7, 0.06%
Nigeria
7 publications, 0.06%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 7, 0.06%
Yugoslavia
7 publications, 0.06%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 6, 0.05%
Venezuela
6 publications, 0.05%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 6, 0.05%
Egypt
6 publications, 0.05%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 6, 0.05%
Iran
6 publications, 0.05%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 6, 0.05%
Kenya
6 publications, 0.05%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 5, 0.04%
Georgia
5 publications, 0.04%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 0.04%
Pakistan
5 publications, 0.04%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 4, 0.03%
Sudan
4 publications, 0.03%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.02%
Romania
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.02%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.02%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.02%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.02%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.02%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.02%
UAE
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.02%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.01%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.01%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.01%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.01%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.01%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.01%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.01%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.01%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.01%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.01%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 1, 0.01%
Madagascar
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.01%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.01%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Somalia
|
Somalia, 1, 0.01%
Somalia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.01%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.01%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.01%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (49 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
2 profile journal articles
GANTIER Jean-Charles
PhD in Education, Professor
63 publications,
1 449 citations
h-index: 23
Research interests
Insect taxonomy
1 profile journal article
Kokwaro Gilbert

Strathmore University
104 publications,
3 553 citations
h-index: 31
1 profile journal article
Millán Ángel
111 publications,
5 273 citations
h-index: 31