Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, volume 70, issue 2, pages 363-377

What is the relationship between the global structures of apo and holo proteins?

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2007-08-06
scimago Q1
SJR1.086
CiteScore5.9
Impact factor3.2
ISSN08873585, 10970134
PubMed ID:  17680687
Biochemistry
Molecular Biology
Structural Biology
Abstract
It is well known that ligand binding and release may induce a wide range of structural changes in a receptor protein, varying from small movements of loops or side chains in the binding pocket to large-scale domain hinge-bending and shear motions or even partial unfolding that facilitates the capture and release of a ligand. An interesting question is what in general are the conformational changes triggered by ligand binding? The aim of this work is analyze the magnitude of structural changes in a protein resulting from ligand binding to assess if the state of ligand binding needs to be included in template-based protein structure prediction algorithms. To address this issue, a nonredundant dataset of 521 paired protein structures in the ligand-free and ligand-bound form was created and used to estimate the degree of both local and global structure similarity between the apo and holo forms. In most cases, the proteins undergo relatively small conformational rearrangements of their tertiary structure upon ligand binding/release (most root-mean-square-deviations from native, RMSD, are <1 A). However, a clear difference was observed between single- and multiple-domain proteins. For the latter, RMSD changes greater than 1 A and sometimes larger were found for almost 1/3 of the cases; these are mainly associated with large-scale hinge-bending movements of entire domains. The changes in the mutual orientation of individual domains in multiple-domain proteins upon ligand binding were investigated using a mechanistic model based on mass-weighted principal axes as well as interface buried surface calculations. Some preferences toward the anticipated mechanism of protein domain movements are predictable based on the examination of just the ligand-free structural form. These results have applications to protein structure prediction, particularly in the context of protein domain assembly, if additional information concerning ligand binding is exploited.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
2
4
6
8
10
12
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?