Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
5.6
SJR
1.396
CiteScore
9.8
Categories
Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous)
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Computer Science Applications
Library and Information Sciences
Areas
Chemical Engineering
Chemistry
Computer Science
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2005-2025
journal names
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
J CHEM INF MODEL
JCIM
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
(25269 citations)

Molecules
(4973 citations)

Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
(4574 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
(120 publications)

University of Cambridge
(113 publications)

Zhejiang University
(81 publications)

Zhejiang University
(55 publications)

University of Cambridge
(53 publications)

Michigan State University
(40 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 4759
Q2

Physicochemical Properties and Biocompatibility of Injectable Hydroxyapatite Cement and Its Application in Compressive Tibial Plateau Fractures
Zhou X., Sun X., Chen G., Chen Y., Zhang Z., Qian Z., Zeng Q., Miao J.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTInjectable carbonated hydroxyapatite (ICHA) cement was developed by adding 2% Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) to carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHA) cement, improving its rheological properties and injectability for minimally invasive orthopedic use. The cement's physical and chemical properties, including curing time, strength, porosity, and consistency, were tested in vitro. Scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to analyze the cured cement. Bone marrow stromal cells were cultured with ICHA cement extracts and specimens to test cell growth (MTT assay) and cytotoxicity. In vivo, the cement was implanted into rabbit muscles to assess inflammation and capsule formation, along with other biocompatibility tests, including hemolysis and pyrogen testing. ICHA cement sets without heat generation, with a 9‐min initial setting time and a 15‐min final setting time, similar to CHA cement. The strength reaches 20 MPa after 1 day and peaks at 35 MPa after 7 days. Its porosity is slightly higher than CHA cement, and it resists dilution well, preventing disintegration in water. The consistency of ICHA cement is lower than CHA cement at different time points (p < 0.001), showing a logarithmic change pattern. With adjustable setting time, good resistance to dilution, and compressive strength similar to cancellous bone, ICHA cement is well suited for clinical use. Its composition closely resembles natural bone, offering strong fixation and stability for tibial plateau healing, which supports early movement and reduces the risk of joint stiffness and post‐traumatic arthritis.
Q2

Piezoelectric Biomaterials for Use in Bone Tissue Engineering—A Narrative Review
Choudhury S., Das D., Roy S., Chowdhury A.R.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTTo examine natural bone's bioelectrical traits, notably its piezoelectricity, and to look into how these characteristics influence bone growth and repair. In the context of exploring the potential of piezoelectric biomaterials, such as biopolymers and bio‐ceramics, towards orthopedic and bone regeneration applications, the research seeks to evaluate the significance of piezoelectricity‐driven osteogenesis. The paper reviews recent research on bone's electrical and dielectric properties, surface polarization/electrical stimulation effects interacting with cell activity and the effectiveness of piezoelectric biomaterials to support tissues' regenerative process. The study includes a number of materials, such as collagen, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and barium titanate. The applications of piezoelectric bio‐ceramics, piezoelectric organic polymers, and piezoelectric natural polymers are particularly highlighted. Piezoelectric biomaterials are being shown in recent studies to enhance cellular metabolism in vitro as well as promote the regeneration of tissues in vivo, especially when paired with electric field stimulation or interface polarization. Piezoelectric bio‐ceramics like magnesium silicate and barium titanate, as well as biopolymers like collagen and PVDF, have shown possibilities for orthopedic applications. However, there are several challenges regarding the manufacturing of bio‐ceramics of specific compositions having the desired properties. This review highlighted the potential of piezoelectric biomaterials in orthopedic applications with special emphasis on biopolymers and bioceramics. Therefore, these types of materials have huge potential for bone regeneration because they can mimic the piezoelectric properties of bone and allow better advances in tissue engineering or regenerative medicine. To date, little is known about their mechanism of action, and modifications are needed to improve efficacy for clinical uptake.
Q2

Effect of Tricalcium Phosphate Foam and Paste Bone Grafting Materials Designed for Improved Surgical Handling on Osteogenesis in a Sheep Scapula Model
Neckel N., Wüster J., Xiang‐Tischhauser L., Mir S., Adel‐Khattab D., Stang B., Kuhr A., Barnewitz D., Genzel A., Koerdt S., Rendenbach C., Heiland M., Nahles S., Stiller M., Knabe C.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTReconstruction of critical‐size bone defects (CSDs) with complex defect morphologies remains clinically challenging. The desire to avoid autograft harvesting has prompted an increasing quest for adequate synthetic bone grafting materials. The clinical success rates, which have been achieved with bioactive β‐tricalcium phosphate granules (TCP‐G) demonstrate that these materials have become an excellent alternative graft choice. In order to improve surgical handling properties, TCP‐G have been combined with natural polymers for creating paste‐ and foam‐like materials, which can easily be molded into any desired shape when grafting a given bony defect or deploying them with a syringe. This study assessed the effect of a TCP paste (TCP‐P) and a TCP‐foam (TCP‐F) bone grafting material as compared to TCP‐G on bone formation and osteogenic marker expression after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of implantation in CSD in the sheep scapula and tested the hypothesis that the addition of natural polymers would not diminish the osteogenic properties of TCP‐P and TCP‐F. The bone and bone graft material area fractions were determined histomorphometrically in order to quantify bone formation and bone graft material resorption. Immunohistochemical analysis of collagen type I, osteocalcin, and bone sialoprotein expression in the various cell and matrix components of the bone tissue was performed on resin‐embedded sections for characterizing the osteogenic and bioactive properties of the test materials. By 6 months, all three TCP materials facilitated excellent defect regeneration with further bone remodeling at 12 and 18 months. TCP‐F and TCP‐P induced greater osteocalcin expression and exhibited more advanced graft material resorption at 1 and 6 months, respectively. At 18 months, all three grafting materials were almost fully resorbed with the original bony architecture being restored. Taken together, the hyaluronic acid and methylcellulose components in TCP‐P and porcine collagen components in TCP‐F did not diminish the osteogenic capacity of TCP‐P and TCP‐F, which exhibited an even slightly higher resorbability and enhancement effect on OC expression by osteoblasts.
Q2

Biological Coatings: Advanced Strategies Driving Multifunctionality and Clinical Potential in Dermal Substitutes
Wu Y., Ji C., Yan Z., Fang X., Wang Y., Ma Y., Li J., Jin S., Chen H., Ji S., Zheng Y., Xiao S.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTSkin tissue defects caused by various acute and chronic etiologies frequently occur in clinical medicine. Traditional surgical repair methods have certain limitations, while dermal substitutes combined with skin grafting have become an alternative to conventional surgery. Biological coatings, by loading bioactive substances such as polysaccharides and proteins, or by using bioactive substances as carriers, can promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. This optimizes the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of the substitutes, enhances their antibacterial properties, and improves their feasibility for clinical application. This paper explores various common biological coating materials and the construction methods used in the field of dermal substitutes. It highlights the importance and necessity of biological coatings in the development of multifunctional designs for dermal substitutes. By summarizing the current research, this paper aims to offer new insights and references for the multifunctional design and clinical application of dermal substitutes.
Q2

Evaluation of Burn Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration in Animal Model Using Alginate/PVA Nanofibrous Wound Dressings Containing Dragon's Blood
Seyedi D., Salehi M., Zamani S., Cheraghali D., Dehghani F., Mehrabi M.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTThe challenge of healing burn wounds is significant importance in global healthcare systems, with a high demand for advanced wound dressings to aid in the treatment of such injuries. Promising options include bioactive electrospun scaffolds made from polymers with antimicrobial properties, which can prevent infections and promote faster healing. This study involved the creation of a nanofibrous scaffold using the electrospinning technique, which consisted of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), alginate (Alg), and Dragon's blood (DB). The scaffold was then analyzed for both its morphology and chemical composition. Results indicated that the DB was present in the nanofibrous scaffold, which had a uniform and unbranched appearance with fibers measuring approximately 300–400 nm in diameter. Additionally, mechanical property testing revealed promising results that fall within the range of human skin. The scaffold's wound healing potential was evaluated through various measurements, including water contact angle, drug release, water vapor permeability, blood compatibility, blood clotting index, and antibacterial activity. Results from an in vivo study on burn wounds showed that scaffolds containing 20% DB exhibited excellent wound healing ability with 80.3% wound closure after 21 days. This was attributed to the highest collagen synthesis, re‐epithelization and remodeling of the burned skin. Therefore, PVA/Alg/DB nanofibrous scaffolds hold promise as a wound dressing to treat burn injuries.
Q2

Synthesis and Characterization of Bioactive Glass via CTAB Modified Sol‐Gel Method for In Vitro Biological Activities
Bakare F.F., Ewente B.G., Akililu T.C., Jara A.D., Gonfa G.M.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTBone defect repair methods have significant drawbacks and limitations. The discovery and development of bioactive glasses (BGs) have greatly advanced the treatment of bone diseases. BGs can uniquely bond to living tissues, including bone, due to the formation of a hydroxyapatite (HAp) layer on their surface. These glasses synthesized using various catalysts and structure‐directing agents to enhance their biological activities. However, most catalysts generate toxicity, alter pH levels, and work at high concentrations. Similarly, many surfactants have limited surface areas, poor capacity to create well‐defined mesoporous structures, and potential toxicity, reducing the bioactivity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability of the BGs. To address these issues, this study evaluates a bioactive glass synthesized via the sol–gel process, using low concentration CTAB as a structure‐directing agent and citric acid as a catalyst. The phase composition, surface morphology, specific surface area, inner structure, crystal structure, elemental composition, and functional groups of the samples were characterized using X‐ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDS), and Fourier‐transform infrared microscopy (FTIR) techniques, respectively. The in vitro bioactivity was tested by soaking samples in simulated body fluid and analyzing the HAp layer formation using XRD, SEM, and FTIR. In addition, the in vitro biocompatibility, and an in vitro biodegradability were measured. 0.3 M of CTAB (BG3) exhibited a larger specific surface area with spherical‐shaped particles and pore volume with a mesoporous structure results better in bioactivity and biodegradability. Furthermore, all samples exhibited cell viability above 70%, indicating that the prepared materials are biocompatible. The findings highlight the potential of CTAB‐modified BGs for biomedical applications, especially in bone repair and regeneration.
Q2

Are All Alginate Dressings Equivalent?
Duciel L., Proust R., Ponsen A., Ziarelli F., Coudreuse A., Jeanmichel L., Samardzic M., Uzan G., Courtils C.D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTAlginate dressings are widely used in wound treatment for their healing and hemostatic properties and their capacity to drain exudate. However, a clear understanding of the heterogeneity within this class of dressings is lacking. Numerous sources of variability exist between alginate dressings: their composition (% of calcium alginate relative to other components), the ratio of D‐Mannuronic and L‐Guluronic acids in the alginate fraction, their purity (presence of toxic contaminants), and the shape of their fibers (surface and thickness). These parameters affect the performance and safety of alginate dressings, which may thus not be interchangeable in clinical practice. Therefore, clinicians must be aware of these differences to ensure optimal treatment and avoid complications or suboptimal healing. The objective of this study was to compare six alginate dressings to conclude or not on their equivalence. The results obtained demonstrate considerable variability between alginate dressings in the assessed characteristics: composition, Ca2+ release, level of cytotoxicity, fiber shape, draining capacity, and their resistance to traction. Algostéril, the only pure calcium alginate rich in G, releases a specific dose of Ca2+ and is the only non‐cytotoxic dressing. With its multilobed fibers that are statistically the thickest, it provides the best draining capacity and greatest resistance to traction. These results demonstrate that alginate dressings are not equivalent. Each dressing is distinct, and consequently the clinical performance of one cannot be transposed to the others. Therefore, each alginate dressing should demonstrate its own efficacy, in a given indication, through a clinical trial.
Q2

Vitamin D Screening and Supplementation—A Novel Approach to Higher Success: An Update and Review of the Current Literature
Wiedemann T.G., Jin H.W., Gallagher B., Witek L., Miron R.J., Talib H.S.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTIn recognizing the critical role of vitamin D in bone metabolism and osseointegration, research aims to identify whether preoperative vitamin D deficiency serves as a risk factor for early implant failure. By analyzing patient outcomes and their serum vitamin D levels, studies seek to establish evidence‐based recommendations for vitamin D assessment and management in the preoperative period, with the ultimate goal of enhancing implant success rates and patient outcomes in dental implantology. Given these insights, it is important for clinicians to incorporate the preoperative evaluation of vitamin D serum levels into their standard protocol for patients undergoing dental implant procedures. The objective of this study is to review and investigate the correlation between early dental implant failure (EDIF) and reduced serum levels of vitamin D, and to evaluate the potential benefits of preoperative screening and supplementation of vitamin D in patients undergoing dental implant surgery. A literature review was performed using a selected database—PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and SCOPUS—to assess the effect of vitamin D3 level on EDIF and biological factors (i.e., peri‐implant bone level). Studies were limited to peer‐reviewed, indexed journals. Subsequently, a hypothesis was proposed that vitamin D3 supplementation would mitigate the negative effect of vitamin D3 deficiency. The potential benefit of vitamin D3 supplementation—systemic and topical—was assessed in terms of bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and peri‐implant bone level. The deleterious effects of low vitamin D serum levels on osseointegration of dental implants and immune system modulation are increasingly accepted. Evidence has displayed that deficiency of this vitamin can result in impaired peri‐implant bone formation. Vitamin D deficiency resulted in nearly a fourfold increase in overall EDIF incidence. Presurgical supplementation of vitamin D3 demonstrated increased levels of implant osseointegration, increased bone–implant contact, enhanced bone level maintenance, and decreased EDIF even in at‐risk demographics (i.e., diabetic subjects). The findings of this study reinforce the role of vitamin D in dental implant osseointegration. Our study, particularly, emphasizes the necessity of vitamin D supplementation for individuals with sub‐physiologic vitamin D serum levels (≤ 30 ng/mL) and those within specific risk categories: smokers, diabetics, obese individuals, and those with compromised immune systems. Adopting a proactive management plan, including screening and supplementation in these patients, may substantially enhance the clinical outcomes in dental implant surgery.
Q2

Effect of Microporous Surface Zirconia on Mechanical Properties and Biological Behavior of Human Gingival Fibroblasts
Zhang L., He L., Wang X., Hu J., Jiang Q.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTAs a commonly used material in prosthodontics, zirconia has garnered widespread attention. Addressing the shortcomings of existing zirconia materials, this study aims to investigate the mechanical properties of microporous surface zirconia ceramics and their impact on the biological behavior of human gingival cells. Microporous surface zirconia was developed using a novel ceramic plasticity process, sintered at 1460°C for densification. The surface morphology and composition were determined through scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectrometer. Surface roughness was measured using atomic force microscopy, hydrophilicity angle was determined using a contact angle measurement instrument, and X‐ray diffractometer assessed the crystalline phase content before and after aging. Material flexural strength was determined using a universal testing machine. The influence of microporous surface zirconia on the adhesion and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) was investigated through CCK‐8 and immunofluorescence staining for Integrin β1 and F‐actin. The pore structure of microporous surface zirconia (MZ) group is uniform, with a flexural strength of 1375.86 ± 76.97 MPa, significantly higher than the control (Cont) group (p < 0.05). The percentage of HGFs adhesion to the MZ group was markedly higher than the Cont group (p < 0.05). Fluorescence of Integrin β1 and F‐actin in the MZ group was significantly higher than in the Cont group. In conclusion, Microporous surface zirconia promotes the attachment and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts, facilitating early closure of soft tissues.
Q2

In Vivo Evaluation of Thermally Drawn Biodegradable Optical Fibers as Brain Implants
Abdollahian P., Sui K., Li G., Wang J., Zhang C., Wang Y., Berg R.W., Meneghetti M., Markos C.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTOptical fiber technology plays a critical role in modern neuroscience towards understanding the complex neuronal dynamics within the nervous system. In this study, we manufactured and characterized amorphous thermally drawn poly D, L‐lactic acid (PDLLA) biodegradable optical fibers in different diameters. These optical fibers were then implanted into the lateral posterior region of the mouse brain for four months, allowing us to assess their degradation characteristics. The gradual dissolution of the implanted PDLLA optical fibers in the brain was confirmed by optical, photoacoustic, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), light propagation characteristics, and molecular weight measurements. The results indicate that the degradation rate of the biodegradable optical fiber was mainly pronounced during the first week. After four months, degradation led to the formation of micropores on the surface of the implanted fiber within the gray matter region of the brain. We believe that the PDLLA biodegradable optical fiber developed in this study constitutes a promising candidate for further functionalization and development of next‐generation biocompatible, soft, and biodegradable bi‐directional neural interfaces.
Q2

Utilization of Bulk RNA Sequencing for the Evaluation of Keratin Nanomaterials as a Coating for Percutaneous Devices
Miller A., Beck J.P., White A., Agarwal J., Bachus K.N., Jeyapalina S., Van Dyke M.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTDespite advances in the design and protocols for maintaining the skin/device interface around percutaneous devices (PDs), no current strategy ensures the permanent attachment of peri‐implant epithelial tissue to the device surface. Based on preliminary data, we hypothesized that PDs coated with keratin nanomaterials, resembling the fingernail‐nailbed interface, could provide a biochemically mediated surface that enhances epidermal cell adhesion and differentiation. To test this hypothesis, 15 Yucatan miniature pigs were each implanted with six percutaneous titanium devices, comprising three porous and three smooth devices, both with and without keratin coatings (Kerateine [iKNT] and Keratose [gKOS]). The pigs were sacrificed at 4, 8, and 16 weeks post‐implantation. The devices and surrounding tissues were harvested and analyzed using histological and RNA sequencing techniques. Compared to smooth peri‐implant tissue, porous peri‐implant tissue showed a significant decrease in epithelial downgrowth, fibrous capsule thickness, and infection rates, alongside a significant upregulation of multiple immune marker genes, including IL12B. At the 16‐week period, gKOS‐coated surfaces demonstrated a more favorable wound healing response than iKTN‐coated devices, with a reduction in granulation tissue area and a significant upregulation of several keratin genes related to differentiation. Among the combinations of surface types and coatings studied, the porous gKOS‐coated device produced the most favorable wound healing response.
Q2

Process‐Dependent Variations in the Proliferation of Myoblasts, Fibroblasts and Chondrocytes on Laser‐Sintered Polypropylene
Detsch R., Schlicht S., Nawaz Q., Boccaccini A.R., Drummer D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTAdditively manufactured polyolefins find broad applications in medical engineering, enabling the manufacturing of patient‐specific geometries. For investigating the influence of processing conditions of laser sintered locally macroporous polypropylene substrates, the response of myoblasts, chondrocytes, and fibroblasts has been characterized in this study. An influence of the applied manufacturing parameters on the attachment and viability of the investigated cells is observed, showing the effect of the superficial pore topology on the attachment and the spreading of cells. The viability and attachment of fibroblasts and chondrocytes could be improved by reducing the thermal exposure during the processing step of the dense base part, associated with increased superficial porosity and the corresponding increase of the surface area. The applied additive manufacturing process of macroporous structures influences emerging cell morphologies, leading to an extended morphological expression of chondrocytes and the overgrowth of small pores by fibroblasts. This indicates an improvement in superficial cell adhesion due to larger pores. These findings indicate the significance of the processing conditions in laser sintering of polypropylene on the cell response through the optimization of processing parameters and the attachment of an open‐cell pore structure.
Q2

Gold Nanorods (GNRs ): A Golden Nano Compass to Navigate Breast Cancer by Multimodal Imaging Approaches
Varma S., Bamb A.L., Haldar N., Gajbhiye V., Amalnerkar D., Chaudhari B.P.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTThe ongoing rise in the incidences of breast cancer cases has concerned medical and scientific personnel around the world. Adequate treatment of cancer predominantly relies on the pertinent diagnosis of the type of cancer as well as other molecular and cellular details at the initial stage only. Surprisingly, up till now, there is no single, self‐reliant imaging modality that helps to systematically find out the anatomical and functional events taking place inside the body. This resulted in the advent of the multimodal imaging concept, which encompasses the integration of complementary imaging modalities by designing multimodal imaging probes. Gold nanorods (GNRs) are extremely popular and effective nanoparticles for multimodal bioimaging due to their unique properties. Researchers have designed varieties of stable and biocompatible GNR‐based probes for targeted and nontargeted multimodal imaging of breast cancer. However, there is a lack of investigations on the in vivo fate and the toxicity of GNRs. Thus, their preclinical to clinical translation can be attained by comprehensively determining the in vivo fate and toxicity of GNRs. The review provides details about the GNRs‐based nanoprobes fabricated so far for breast cancer imaging, which, by consequent studies, can be taken up to clinical usage.
Q2

Effects of Nitrogen and Hydrogen Plasma Treatments on a Mg‐2Y‐1Zn‐1Mn Resorbable Alloy
Shekargoftar M., Ravanbakhsh S., de Oliveira V.S., Paternoster C., Chevallier P., Witte F., Sarkissian A., Mantovani D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTMg alloys have recently been investigated and optimized for the development of biodegradable implants for orthopedic, dental, vascular, and other applications. However, their rapid degradation in a physiological environment remains the main obstacle to their development. In this work, the effects of nitrogen and hydrogen plasma treatments on the surface properties and corrosion behavior of an Mg‐2Y‐1Zn‐1Mn (WZM211) alloy were investigated. Plasma treatment effectively modified the surface of a WZM211 alloy by removing the original oxide layer, followed by the formation of a new surface layer with controlled composition, thickness, and wettability. The water contact angle decreased from 100° to 17° after nitrogen plasma and to 45° after hydrogen plasma treatment. The nitrogen plasma treatment, shortly N‐Plasma, resulted in the lowest corrosion rate (CRN = 0.038 ± 0.010 mm/y) if compared with the hydrogen plasma treatment, shortly H‐Plasma (CRH = 0.044 ± 0.003 mm/y) and untreated samples (0.233 ± 0.097 mm/y). The results demonstrate the potential of nitrogen and hydrogen plasma treatment for the development of resorbable Mg‐based implants.
Q2

Physicochemical Characterization of Hyaluronic Acid‐Methylcellulose Semi‐Gels for Mitochondria Transplantation
Ahmed A.J., Gallegos Z.A., Dinar M.A., Sullivan P.G., DeRouchey J.E., Patel S.P., Rabchevsky A.G., Dziubla T.D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTTraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) presents a significant medical challenge due to its intricate nature and treatment complexities. SCI can cause physical impairments by affecting neural and motor functions as well as initiating a series of pathophysiological events exacerbating the initial trauma. Leakage from ruptured neurons and vessels disrupt ionic balance and induces excitotoxicity, leading to progressive cellular degeneration. Introducing mitochondria to the SCI lesion has shown potential in attenuating secondary injury. Mitochondria transplantation improves cellular bioenergetics and reduces concentration of reactive oxygen species achieving homeostasis and neuroprotection. Nonetheless, keeping mitochondria viable outside cell environment for a time longer than a few minutes proves to be challenging. Additionally, localized delivery to the injury site has also been limited by other factors including flow rate of cerebrospinal fluid that washes away mobilized organelle from the compromised tissue site. Previously we showed that using hyaluronic acid‐methylcellulose semi‐gels (HAMC) as a biocompatible, erodible thermogelling delivery vehicle helped to overcome some of these challenges. HAMC allows for controlled release at and around the injury site, utilizing the reverse thermogelling property of MC. Sustained release of mitochondria at slower rate can increase their uptake in spinal tissue. To better optimize the semi‐gel delivery of mitochondria requires a more complete understanding of the physicochemical properties of the HAMC semi‐gels. We have used ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy to measure optical density of HAMC semi‐gels for different HA to MC ratios and examine the temperature dependent gelation properties above their low critical solution temperature (LCST). The viscosity and degree of crystallinity of the resulting HAMC semi‐gels were also assessed. Semi‐gel erosion and mitochondrial release over time were studied using a fluorescence microplate reader. Lastly, seahorse assay was used to study released mitochondria respiration and viability after incubation in HAMC semi‐gel.
Top-100
Citing journals
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
25269 citations, 9.3%
|
|
Molecules
4973 citations, 1.83%
|
|
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
4574 citations, 1.68%
|
|
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
4512 citations, 1.66%
|
|
Journal of Cheminformatics
4460 citations, 1.64%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
4241 citations, 1.56%
|
|
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
3845 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
3686 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Scientific Reports
3096 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Molecular Informatics
3018 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
2663 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
2607 citations, 0.96%
|
|
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
2375 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
2311 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
2301 citations, 0.85%
|
|
ACS Omega
2278 citations, 0.84%
|
|
PLoS ONE
2027 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Briefings in Bioinformatics
1827 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
1754 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Journal of Computational Chemistry
1751 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
1634 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Drug Discovery Today
1554 citations, 0.57%
|
|
RSC Advances
1492 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
1391 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Molecular Diversity
1377 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Nature Communications
1333 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure
1328 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Food and Chemical Toxicology
1319 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Chemical Science
1307 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science
1284 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Future Medicinal Chemistry
1253 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Chemical Biology and Drug Design
1227 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Bioinformatics
1219 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Modeling
1154 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
1131 citations, 0.42%
|
|
ChemMedChem
1100 citations, 0.4%
|
|
SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research
1100 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
1093 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
1010 citations, 0.37%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
936 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Digital Discovery
870 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters
863 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Frontiers in Chemistry
854 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
844 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Computers in Biology and Medicine
831 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
815 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Lipophilicity in Drug Action and Toxicology
814 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
792 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
790 citations, 0.29%
|
|
BMC Bioinformatics
769 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Computational Biology and Chemistry
753 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Chemical Research in Toxicology
715 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
713 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Nucleic Acids Research
699 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
687 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Bioorganic Chemistry
684 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
659 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
648 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Biomolecules
627 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Medicinal Chemistry Research
613 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Molecular Pharmaceutics
600 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
528 citations, 0.19%
|
|
ChemInform
513 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Chemistry - A European Journal
504 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
477 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
466 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
461 citations, 0.17%
|
|
PLoS Computational Biology
427 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
424 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
424 citations, 0.16%
|
|
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
408 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
404 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Biochemistry
389 citations, 0.14%
|
|
ChemistrySelect
388 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Chemosphere
388 citations, 0.14%
|
|
MedChemComm
382 citations, 0.14%
|
|
ACS Catalysis
381 citations, 0.14%
|
|
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
377 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
365 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Biophysical Journal
353 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
345 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nature Machine Intelligence
338 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Chemical Physics Letters
337 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Pharmaceutics
329 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
324 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Methods
312 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Molecular BioSystems
311 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry
310 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Molecular Simulation
305 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Structural Chemistry
303 citations, 0.11%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
301 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Scientific data
298 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry
294 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
288 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
285 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
277 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Protein Science
273 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
272 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Recognition
260 citations, 0.1%
|
|
F1000Research
259 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
|
Citing publishers
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
55745 citations, 20.51%
|
|
Elsevier
52709 citations, 19.39%
|
|
Springer Nature
38169 citations, 14.04%
|
|
Wiley
27292 citations, 10.04%
|
|
MDPI
16933 citations, 6.23%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
12927 citations, 4.76%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
12821 citations, 4.72%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
6384 citations, 2.35%
|
|
Oxford University Press
5472 citations, 2.01%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
5174 citations, 1.9%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3270 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3005 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2671 citations, 0.98%
|
|
AIP Publishing
2416 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
957 citations, 0.35%
|
|
IOP Publishing
901 citations, 0.33%
|
|
SAGE
769 citations, 0.28%
|
|
IGI Global
767 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
758 citations, 0.28%
|
|
607 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
540 citations, 0.2%
|
|
World Scientific
499 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
496 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
490 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
483 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
457 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
437 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
388 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
388 citations, 0.14%
|
|
F1000 Research
339 citations, 0.12%
|
|
King Saud University
332 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Annual Reviews
313 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
293 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
291 citations, 0.11%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
268 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
262 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
240 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Portland Press
228 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
212 citations, 0.08%
|
|
PeerJ
209 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
197 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Royal Society
182 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IntechOpen
181 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Biophysical Society
175 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
170 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
158 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Impact Journals
145 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
96 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
95 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
91 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Science in China Press
85 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
84 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
81 citations, 0.03%
|
|
A and V Publications
77 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
71 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Computer Chemistry, Japan
70 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
62 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
60 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
58 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
53 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Newlands Press Ltd
53 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
52 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
51 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
50 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
48 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Higher Education Press
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Publishers
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Emerald
46 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Biophysical Society of Japan
46 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
45 citations, 0.02%
|
|
42 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Biochemistry
42 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
41 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Chem-Bio Informatics Society
37 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
35 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
29 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SciELO
28 citations, 0.01%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
28 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Physiological Society
27 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering
27 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Asian Journal of Chemistry
27 citations, 0.01%
|
|
JMIR Publications
27 citations, 0.01%
|
|
26 citations, 0.01%
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
26 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Medknow
25 citations, 0.01%
|
|
24 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
24 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
23 citations, 0.01%
|
|
ASME International
23 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
23 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry
22 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Microbiology Society
21 citations, 0.01%
|
|
BMJ
21 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Biomedical Chemistry
21 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
21 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz
20 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Turkish Chemical Society
20 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
20 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
120 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Cambridge
113 publications, 1.42%
|
|
Zhejiang University
81 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
78 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
69 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Hamburg University
66 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Michigan
63 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
62 publications, 0.78%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
61 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
60 publications, 0.75%
|
|
ETH Zurich
58 publications, 0.73%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
58 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Peking University
57 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Michigan State University
56 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
55 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Sheffield
54 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
52 publications, 0.65%
|
|
National Institute of Chemistry
52 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Oxford
51 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
50 publications, 0.63%
|
|
East China Normal University
49 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Uppsala University
48 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Kyoto University
46 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
45 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University College London
43 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
43 publications, 0.54%
|
|
China Pharmaceutical University
42 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Italian Institute of Technology
42 publications, 0.53%
|
|
New York University Shanghai
40 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
40 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
38 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences
38 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies
38 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Unilever
37 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Purdue University
36 publications, 0.45%
|
|
AstraZeneca
36 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Boehringer Ingelheim
35 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
35 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Forschungszentrum Jülich
35 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Tokyo
35 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
35 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Barcelona
35 publications, 0.44%
|
|
New York University
34 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
34 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
33 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Central South University
33 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Bologna
33 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
33 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Vienna
33 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
32 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
32 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
31 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Manchester
31 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Paris Cité University
31 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
31 publications, 0.39%
|
|
GlaxoSmithKline
31 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Tübingen
30 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Sichuan University
30 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Lorraine
30 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Padua
29 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Leiden University
29 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Toronto
29 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Shandong University
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Bristol
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Porto
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Florida
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
27 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Perugia
27 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research
27 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences
27 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Fudan University
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Nankai University
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Milan
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Ohio State University
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Osaka University
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Minnesota
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Jilin University
25 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Lisbon
25 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Imperial College London
25 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Siena
25 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of British Columbia
25 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Tsinghua University
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Southampton
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Stanford University
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Barcelona Biomedical Research Park
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Bern
23 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Monash University
23 publications, 0.29%
|
|
McGill University
23 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Hospital del Mar Research Institute
23 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
23 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Basel
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
National University of Singapore
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Zhejiang University
55 publications, 1.7%
|
|
University of Cambridge
53 publications, 1.64%
|
|
Michigan State University
40 publications, 1.24%
|
|
ETH Zurich
39 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
36 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
35 publications, 1.08%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
33 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Peking University
32 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
29 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Oxford
28 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
28 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Central South University
27 publications, 0.84%
|
|
East China Normal University
27 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Forschungszentrum Jülich
26 publications, 0.81%
|
|
China Pharmaceutical University
25 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Michigan
25 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
24 publications, 0.74%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
24 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
24 publications, 0.74%
|
|
New York University Shanghai
23 publications, 0.71%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
23 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Sichuan University
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University College London
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Hamburg University
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Lorraine
20 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Italian Institute of Technology
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
New York University
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Shandong University
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Tsinghua University
18 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Nankai University
18 publications, 0.56%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
18 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies
18 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
17 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Fudan University
17 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Jilin University
17 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
17 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
17 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Purdue University
17 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences
16 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Vienna
16 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Lehigh University
16 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
16 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Lisbon
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Ohio State University
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Kyoto University
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Tokyo
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Milan
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Padua
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Ningbo University
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Monash University
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Bristol
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Toronto
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Uppsala University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Clemson University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Paris Cité University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Macao Polytechnic University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Leiden University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Yokohama City University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National Institute of Chemistry
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Beijing University of Technology
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Perugia
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
International School for Advanced Studies
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of California, Davis
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Boehringer Ingelheim
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Barcelona
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Florida
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
AstraZeneca
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Xiamen University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Imperial College London
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Oslo
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Sorbonne University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Stony Brook University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Columbia University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Chicago
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Osaka University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
USA
|
USA, 2282, 28.68%
USA
2282 publications, 28.68%
|
China
|
China, 1204, 15.13%
China
1204 publications, 15.13%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 743, 9.34%
Germany
743 publications, 9.34%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 680, 8.55%
United Kingdom
680 publications, 8.55%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 397, 4.99%
Italy
397 publications, 4.99%
|
France
|
France, 331, 4.16%
France
331 publications, 4.16%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 321, 4.03%
Japan
321 publications, 4.03%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 280, 3.52%
Spain
280 publications, 3.52%
|
India
|
India, 279, 3.51%
India
279 publications, 3.51%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 246, 3.09%
Switzerland
246 publications, 3.09%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 206, 2.59%
Sweden
206 publications, 2.59%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 191, 2.4%
Canada
191 publications, 2.4%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 180, 2.26%
Brazil
180 publications, 2.26%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 124, 1.56%
Austria
124 publications, 1.56%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 121, 1.52%
Poland
121 publications, 1.52%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 118, 1.48%
Netherlands
118 publications, 1.48%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 114, 1.43%
Australia
114 publications, 1.43%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 110, 1.38%
Russia
110 publications, 1.38%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 110, 1.38%
Republic of Korea
110 publications, 1.38%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 99, 1.24%
Belgium
99 publications, 1.24%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 81, 1.02%
Slovenia
81 publications, 1.02%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 78, 0.98%
Portugal
78 publications, 0.98%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 72, 0.9%
Denmark
72 publications, 0.9%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 65, 0.82%
Mexico
65 publications, 0.82%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 62, 0.78%
Chile
62 publications, 0.78%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 61, 0.77%
Czech Republic
61 publications, 0.77%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 58, 0.73%
Finland
58 publications, 0.73%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 57, 0.72%
Hungary
57 publications, 0.72%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 57, 0.72%
Singapore
57 publications, 0.72%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 55, 0.69%
Greece
55 publications, 0.69%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 55, 0.69%
Israel
55 publications, 0.69%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 54, 0.68%
Argentina
54 publications, 0.68%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 51, 0.64%
Turkey
51 publications, 0.64%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 35, 0.44%
Ireland
35 publications, 0.44%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 35, 0.44%
Thailand
35 publications, 0.44%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 33, 0.41%
Norway
33 publications, 0.41%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 31, 0.39%
Iran
31 publications, 0.39%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 30, 0.38%
Ukraine
30 publications, 0.38%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 28, 0.35%
Malaysia
28 publications, 0.35%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 27, 0.34%
Vietnam
27 publications, 0.34%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 27, 0.34%
South Africa
27 publications, 0.34%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 23, 0.29%
Pakistan
23 publications, 0.29%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 18, 0.23%
Cuba
18 publications, 0.23%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 17, 0.21%
Colombia
17 publications, 0.21%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 17, 0.21%
New Zealand
17 publications, 0.21%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 15, 0.19%
Saudi Arabia
15 publications, 0.19%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 15, 0.19%
Uruguay
15 publications, 0.19%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 15, 0.19%
Croatia
15 publications, 0.19%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 14, 0.18%
Romania
14 publications, 0.18%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 13, 0.16%
Estonia
13 publications, 0.16%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 13, 0.16%
Egypt
13 publications, 0.16%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 12, 0.15%
Serbia
12 publications, 0.15%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 9, 0.11%
Bulgaria
9 publications, 0.11%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 9, 0.11%
Jordan
9 publications, 0.11%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 9, 0.11%
Slovakia
9 publications, 0.11%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 8, 0.1%
Indonesia
8 publications, 0.1%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 8, 0.1%
UAE
8 publications, 0.1%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 6, 0.08%
Ecuador
6 publications, 0.08%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 4, 0.05%
Iraq
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Yemen
|
Yemen, 4, 0.05%
Yemen
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 4, 0.05%
Cyprus
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 3, 0.04%
Latvia
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 3, 0.04%
Malta
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.04%
Peru
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.03%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 2, 0.03%
Georgia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.03%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.03%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 2, 0.03%
Moldova
2 publications, 0.03%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 2, 0.03%
North Macedonia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0.03%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 2, 0.03%
Montenegro
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.01%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.01%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 1, 0.01%
Afghanistan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.01%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 1, 0.01%
Dominican Republic
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.01%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.01%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.01%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.01%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.01%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.01%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.01%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.01%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.01%
Panama
1 publication, 0.01%
|
El Salvador
|
El Salvador, 1, 0.01%
El Salvador
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.01%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.01%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.01%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (60 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 957, 29.65%
USA
957 publications, 29.65%
|
China
|
China, 717, 22.21%
China
717 publications, 22.21%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 254, 7.87%
United Kingdom
254 publications, 7.87%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 231, 7.16%
Germany
231 publications, 7.16%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 159, 4.93%
Italy
159 publications, 4.93%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 141, 4.37%
Japan
141 publications, 4.37%
|
India
|
India, 139, 4.31%
India
139 publications, 4.31%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 131, 4.06%
Spain
131 publications, 4.06%
|
France
|
France, 130, 4.03%
France
130 publications, 4.03%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 102, 3.16%
Switzerland
102 publications, 3.16%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 98, 3.04%
Brazil
98 publications, 3.04%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 85, 2.63%
Sweden
85 publications, 2.63%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 83, 2.57%
Canada
83 publications, 2.57%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 65, 2.01%
Republic of Korea
65 publications, 2.01%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 57, 1.77%
Netherlands
57 publications, 1.77%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 51, 1.58%
Austria
51 publications, 1.58%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 46, 1.43%
Russia
46 publications, 1.43%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 46, 1.43%
Australia
46 publications, 1.43%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 43, 1.33%
Belgium
43 publications, 1.33%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 39, 1.21%
Poland
39 publications, 1.21%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 34, 1.05%
Czech Republic
34 publications, 1.05%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 30, 0.93%
Portugal
30 publications, 0.93%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 30, 0.93%
Turkey
30 publications, 0.93%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 29, 0.9%
Denmark
29 publications, 0.9%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 29, 0.9%
Chile
29 publications, 0.9%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 27, 0.84%
Israel
27 publications, 0.84%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 27, 0.84%
Singapore
27 publications, 0.84%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 26, 0.81%
Mexico
26 publications, 0.81%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 25, 0.77%
Argentina
25 publications, 0.77%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 25, 0.77%
Finland
25 publications, 0.77%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 23, 0.71%
Hungary
23 publications, 0.71%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 23, 0.71%
Greece
23 publications, 0.71%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 23, 0.71%
Slovenia
23 publications, 0.71%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 21, 0.65%
Norway
21 publications, 0.65%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 19, 0.59%
Thailand
19 publications, 0.59%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 16, 0.5%
Vietnam
16 publications, 0.5%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 16, 0.5%
Pakistan
16 publications, 0.5%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 16, 0.5%
South Africa
16 publications, 0.5%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 12, 0.37%
Iran
12 publications, 0.37%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 12, 0.37%
Saudi Arabia
12 publications, 0.37%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 0.34%
Ireland
11 publications, 0.34%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 11, 0.34%
New Zealand
11 publications, 0.34%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 10, 0.31%
Malaysia
10 publications, 0.31%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 9, 0.28%
Ukraine
9 publications, 0.28%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 7, 0.22%
Colombia
7 publications, 0.22%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 7, 0.22%
UAE
7 publications, 0.22%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 6, 0.19%
Cuba
6 publications, 0.19%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 6, 0.19%
Romania
6 publications, 0.19%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 6, 0.19%
Uruguay
6 publications, 0.19%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 6, 0.19%
Croatia
6 publications, 0.19%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 5, 0.15%
Egypt
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 0.15%
Indonesia
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 5, 0.15%
Serbia
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 4, 0.12%
Slovakia
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 3, 0.09%
Bulgaria
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.09%
Peru
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 3, 0.09%
Ecuador
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.06%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.06%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.06%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.06%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0.06%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.03%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.03%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 1, 0.03%
Dominican Republic
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.03%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.03%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.03%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.03%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.03%
Malta
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.03%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.03%
Panama
1 publication, 0.03%
|
El Salvador
|
El Salvador, 1, 0.03%
El Salvador
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.03%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.03%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (45 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
6 profile journal articles
Khrenova Maria
DSc in Chemistry, Professor

Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Lomonosov Moscow State University
168 publications,
1 528 citations
h-index: 22
6 profile journal articles
Kamsri Pharit
PhD in Chemistry, Lecturer, Fellow of the National Research Council of Thailand

Nakhon Phanom University
29 publications,
189 citations
h-index: 8
Research interests
Antibiotics
Drug design
Drug discovery
Molecular Modelling
5 profile journal articles
Abdulagatov Ilmutdin
DSc in Engineering, Professor

Dagestan State University
320 publications,
6 370 citations
h-index: 39
3 profile journal articles
Korolev Vadim

Lomonosov Moscow State University
33 publications,
616 citations
h-index: 11
3 profile journal articles
Ionov Nikita

V. N. Orekhovich Research Institute of Biomedical Chemistry
14 publications,
58 citations
h-index: 3
3 profile journal articles
Fedorov Maksim

Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
146 publications,
6 756 citations
h-index: 39
2 profile journal articles
Mitrofanov Artem
🤝
PhD in Chemistry

Lomonosov Moscow State University
38 publications,
546 citations
h-index: 12
Research interests
Artificial intelligence (AI)
Materials science
Quantum Chemistry
2 profile journal articles
Rosini Elena
75 publications,
2 075 citations
h-index: 26
2 profile journal articles
Biziukova Nadezhda
14 publications,
111 citations
h-index: 6
2 profile journal articles
Pogodin Pavel

V. N. Orekhovich Research Institute of Biomedical Chemistry
36 publications,
1 699 citations
h-index: 17