volume 356 issue 2

Discovery of novel pyrazole and pyrazolo[1,5‐ a ]pyrimidine derivatives as cyclooxygenase inhibitors (COX‐1 and COX‐2) using molecular modeling simulation

Radwa Ayman 1
A. M. Radwan 1
Amira M. Elmetwally 2
Yousry A Ammar 3
Ahmed Ragab 3
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-11-06
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.571
CiteScore7.0
Impact factor3.6
ISSN03656233, 15214184
Drug Discovery
Pharmaceutical Science
Abstract
Searching for effective and selective anti-inflammatory agents, our study involved designing and synthesizing new pyrazole and pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine derivatives 4-11. The structures of the synthesized derivatives were confirmed using different spectroscopic techniques. Virtual screening was achieved for the newly designed derivatives using in silico docking simulation inside the active sites of four proteins classified as two cyclooxygenases (COX)-1 (PDB: 3KK6 and 4OIZ) and two COX-2 (PBD: 1CX2 and 3LN1). Among them, six derivatives 4c, 5b, 6a, 7a, 7b, and 10b displayed the highest binding energy. These derivatives were evaluated for their in vitro COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory activities and their selectivity indexes were calculated. Additionally, these derivatives displayed IC50 values ranging between 4.909 ± 0.25 and 57.53 ± 2.91 µM, and 3.289 ± 0.14 and 124 ± 5.32 µM, against COX-1 and COX-2, respectively. Furthermore, the tested derivatives were found to have selective inhibitory activity on the COX-2 enzyme. Surprisingly, the two pyrazole derivatives 4c and 5b were found to be the most active, with IC50 values of 9.835 ± 0.50 and 4.909 ± 0.25 µM and 4.597 ± 0.20 and 3.289 ± 0.14 µM compared with meloxicam (1.879 ± 0.1 and 5.409 ± 0.23 µM) and celecoxib (5.439 ± 0.28 and 2.164 ± 0.09 µM) against COX-1/-2, respectively. Besides, two pyrazole derivatives, 4c and 5b, displayed a COX-1/COX-2 SI of 2.14 and 1.49. Computational techniques such as molecular docking, density function theory (DFT) calculation, and chemical absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity evaluation were applied to explain the molecules' binding mode, chemical nature, drug likeness, and toxicity prediction.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
RSC Advances
7 publications, 13.46%
Chemistry and Biodiversity
4 publications, 7.69%
Scientific Reports
3 publications, 5.77%
Synthetic Communications
3 publications, 5.77%
Journal of Molecular Structure
3 publications, 5.77%
Drug Development Research
2 publications, 3.85%
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
2 publications, 3.85%
Antibiotics
1 publication, 1.92%
Bioorganic Chemistry
1 publication, 1.92%
Mendeleev Communications
1 publication, 1.92%
Russian Journal of General Chemistry
1 publication, 1.92%
Applied Organometallic Chemistry
1 publication, 1.92%
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
1 publication, 1.92%
Future Medicinal Chemistry
1 publication, 1.92%
Luminescence
1 publication, 1.92%
Chemical Physics Impact
1 publication, 1.92%
Inflammopharmacology
1 publication, 1.92%
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
1 publication, 1.92%
Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
1 publication, 1.92%
Pharmaceuticals
1 publication, 1.92%
Frontiers in Chemistry
1 publication, 1.92%
Discover Applied Sciences
1 publication, 1.92%
Computational Biology and Chemistry
1 publication, 1.92%
Журнал Общей Химии
1 publication, 1.92%
Medicinal Chemistry Research
1 publication, 1.92%
Molecules
1 publication, 1.92%
Pharmaceutics
1 publication, 1.92%
South African Journal of Botany
1 publication, 1.92%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
1 publication, 1.92%
BMC Chemistry
1 publication, 1.92%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Elsevier
14 publications, 26.92%
Springer Nature
9 publications, 17.31%
Wiley
9 publications, 17.31%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
7 publications, 13.46%
MDPI
5 publications, 9.62%
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 7.69%
Pleiades Publishing
2 publications, 3.85%
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
1 publication, 1.92%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 1.92%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
52
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Ayman R. et al. Discovery of novel pyrazole and pyrazolo[1,5‐ a ]pyrimidine derivatives as cyclooxygenase inhibitors (COX‐1 and COX‐2) using molecular modeling simulation // Archiv der Pharmazie. 2022. Vol. 356. No. 2.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Ayman R., Radwan A. M., Elmetwally A. M., Ammar Y. A., Ragab A. Discovery of novel pyrazole and pyrazolo[1,5‐ a ]pyrimidine derivatives as cyclooxygenase inhibitors (COX‐1 and COX‐2) using molecular modeling simulation // Archiv der Pharmazie. 2022. Vol. 356. No. 2.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1002/ardp.202200395
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.202200395
TI - Discovery of novel pyrazole and pyrazolo[1,5‐ a ]pyrimidine derivatives as cyclooxygenase inhibitors (COX‐1 and COX‐2) using molecular modeling simulation
T2 - Archiv der Pharmazie
AU - Ayman, Radwa
AU - Radwan, A. M.
AU - Elmetwally, Amira M.
AU - Ammar, Yousry A
AU - Ragab, Ahmed
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/11/06
PB - Wiley
IS - 2
VL - 356
PMID - 36336646
SN - 0365-6233
SN - 1521-4184
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Ayman,
author = {Radwa Ayman and A. M. Radwan and Amira M. Elmetwally and Yousry A Ammar and Ahmed Ragab},
title = {Discovery of novel pyrazole and pyrazolo[1,5‐ a ]pyrimidine derivatives as cyclooxygenase inhibitors (COX‐1 and COX‐2) using molecular modeling simulation},
journal = {Archiv der Pharmazie},
year = {2022},
volume = {356},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.202200395},
number = {2},
doi = {10.1002/ardp.202200395}
}