Journal of Family Violence
Examining Intimate Partner Violence-Related Fatalities: Past Lessons and Future Directions Using U.S. National Data
Millan A. AbiNader
1
,
Laurie M Graham
2
,
Julie M Kafka
3
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2023-01-12
Journal:
Journal of Family Violence
scimago Q1
SJR: 1.247
CiteScore: 7.0
Impact factor: 2.7
ISSN: 08857482, 15732851
Law
Sociology and Political Science
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Clinical Psychology
Abstract
Among homicides in the United States, intimate partners kill almost 50% of female and 10% of male victims. Intimate partner violence (IPV) also contributes to an estimated 6% of suicides. These trends suggest that opportunities for IPV interventions prior to the fatalities may have been missed. Thus, researchers must investigate the context and circumstances of IPV-related fatalities to inform effective prevention strategy development. There are two primary national fatality databases that can be used to examine such factors: the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS, homicide and suicides); and the Uniform Crime Reporting-Supplementary Homicide Reports (UCR-SHR, homicides). These datasets include data on many IPV-related violent deaths but are limited by variations in data quality. This critical review summarizes opportunities and challenges when examining IPV-related fatalities using these national datasets. To document how the current literature is conceptualizing IPV, a rapid review on IPV-related homicide and suicide articles was performed (2019–2022). Missingness analyses were conducted to describe limitations in key dataset variables. These datasets enable tracking IPV-related fatalities nationally over time. However, issues with the operationalization of variables that record IPV circumstances, particularly in the UCR-SHR, and high levels of missingness represent significant barriers to research. Novel methodologies can optimize the use of these datasets. National-level datasets enable researchers to examine IPV-related fatalities, evaluate policy differences between states, and monitor trends and disparities. This research can inform key recommendations for interventions to prevent IPV-related fatalities.
Found
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.