Effect of Ozoralizumab Administration with or without Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Post-Hoc Analysis

Takeuchi T., Chino Y., Mano Y., Kawanishi M., Sato Y., Uchida S., Tanaka Y.

AbstractOzoralizumab is a bispecific NANOBODY® compound that binds tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and human serum albumin (HSA). Ozoralizumab inhibits the TNFα physiological activity while maintaining long‐term plasma retention owing to its HSA‐binding ability. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed using data from 494 Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in phase II/III and phase III trials to assess the effects of potential PK covariates. The ozoralizumab PK after subcutaneous administration was described using a one‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and first‐order elimination processes. A proportional error model was used for inter‐ and intra‐individual variabilities, with covariance set between inter‐individual variabilities of the apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent distribution volume (Vd/F). Body weight, sex, anti‐drug antibody status, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and concomitant methotrexate use were identified as covariates for CL/F, while body weight and sex were covariates for Vd/F in the final model. Body weight had the greatest effect on the PK of ozoralizumab, while the other covariates had minor effects. When administered at 30 mg every 4 weeks, the predicted steady‐state plasma trough concentration in a patient weighing 83.2 kg exceeded the trough concentration required to maintain efficacy of ozoralizumab, and the estimated exposure in a patient weighing 42.5 kg did not exceed the mean exposure at 80 mg, a well‐tolerated dose, throughout 52 weeks. We developed a population PK model that adequately described the ozoralizumab PK in Japanese patients with RA, and none of the evaluated covariates showed clinically relevant effects on the PK of ozoralizumab.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Tanaka Y.

Takeuchi T.

ABSTRACT Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are currently the most widely used biological agents to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Ozoralizumab (OZR), a novel TNF inhibitor, is an antibody using variable heavy-chain domains of heavy-chain antibody (VHHs) and became the first VHH drug approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in September 2022. VHHs isolated from camelid heavy-chain antibodies can bind antigens with a single molecule. OZR is a trivalent VHH that consists of two anti-human TNFα VHHs and one anti–human serum albumin (anti-HSA) VHH. This review summarizes OZR’s unique structural characteristics and nonclinical and clinical data. The clinical data outline the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, relationship between efficacy and pharmacokinetics, and safety of OZR, focusing on a Phase II/III confirmatory study (OHZORA trial).

Martin K.P., Grimaldi C., Grempler R., Hansel S., Kumar S.

Fernandez C.A.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors are a mainstay of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after failed responses to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Despite the clinical efficacy of TNFα inhibitors (TNFi), many RA patients experience TNFi treatment failure due to the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) that can neutralize drug levels and lead to RA disease relapse. Methotrexate (MTX) therapy with concomitant TNFα inhibitors decreases the risk of TNFi immunogenicity, but additional and/or alternative strategies are needed to reduce MTX-associated toxicities and to further increase its potency for preventing TNFα inhibitor immunogenicity. In this review, we highlight the limitations of MTX for mitigating TNFα inhibitor immunogenicity, and we discuss potential alternative pharmacological targets for decreasing the risk of immunogenicity during TNFα inhibitor therapy based on the key kinases, second messengers, and shared signaling mechanisms of lymphocyte receptor signaling.

Takeuchi T.

AbstractRecent advances in our understanding in the immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) are explored and promoted by the targeted treatment. Among these targets, cytokines and cytokine receptors have become the good candidates for the drug development. In this review, the cytokine and cytokine receptors, which are approved in IMID, are overviewed, and modalities of the treatment, the role of cytokines and cytokine receptors in each disease, and the updated molecular information by modern technologies in rheumatoid arthritis as a role model are shown and discussed for the future perspectives.

Smolen J.S., Landewé R.B., Bergstra S.A., Kerschbaumer A., Sepriano A., Aletaha D., Caporali R., Edwards C.J., Hyrich K.L., Pope J.E., de Souza S., Stamm T.A., Takeuchi T., Verschueren P., Winthrop K.L., et. al.

ObjectivesTo provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field.MethodsAn international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item.ResultsThe task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3–6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations.ConclusionsThese updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost.

Oyama S., Ebina K., Etani Y., Hirao M., Kyuuma M., Fujii Y., Iwata K., Ogawa B., Hasegawa T., Kawano S., Nakanishi Y., Okada S., Nakata K.

In clinical studies, the next-generation anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) single domain antibody ozoralizumab showed high clinical efficacy shortly after the subcutaneous injection. To elucidate the mechanism underlying the rapid onset of the effects of ozoralizumab, we compared the biodistribution kinetics of ozoralizumab and adalimumab after subcutaneous injection in an animal model of arthritis. Alexa Fluor 680-labeled ozoralizumab and adalimumab were administered by subcutaneous injection once (2 mg/kg) at five weeks after induction of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) in an animal arthritis model. The time-course of changes in the fluorescence intensities of the two compounds in the paws and serum were evaluated. The paws of the CIA mice were harvested at four and eight hours after the injection for fluorescence microscopy. Biofluorescence imaging revealed better distribution of ozoralizumab to the joint tissues than of adalimumab, as early as at four hours after the injection. Fluorescence microscopy revealed a greater fluorescence intensity of ozoralizumab in the joint tissues than that of adalimumab at eight hours after the injection. Ozoralizumab showed a significantly higher absorption rate constant as compared with adalimumab. These results indicate that ozoralizumab enters the systemic circulation more rapidly and is distributed to the target tissues earlier and at higher levels than conventional IgG antibodies. Our investigation provides new insight into the mechanism underlying the rapid onset of the effects of ozoralizumab in clinical practice.

Tanaka Y., Kawanishi M., Nakanishi M., Yamasaki H., Takeuchi T.

ABSTRACT Objectives The aim is to assess the efficacy and safety of a 52-week subcutaneous ozoralizumab treatment at 30 and 80 mg without methotrexate (MTX) in active rheumatoid arthritis. Methods This randomised, open-label, multicentre phase III trial randomly allocated 140 patients in 2:1 ratio as subcutaneous ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg every 4 weeks for 52 weeks without MTX. Results Both groups administered ozoralizumab at 30 and 80 mg showed good clinical improvement. The American College of Rheumatology response rates were high at Week 24 and maintained through 52 weeks. The ozoralizumab groups also showed good improvement in other end points, and improvements observed from Week 1 were maintained through 52 weeks. Improvements in many efficacy assessments were similar between doses. No deaths were reported, and serious adverse events occurred in a total of 20 patients in the ozoralizumab groups. Increased antidrug antibodies were observed in approximately 40% of patients in the ozoralizumab groups, and 27.7% of the patients in the 30 mg group were neutralising antibody-positive. Conclusions Ozoralizumab, at 30 and 80 mg, demonstrated significant therapeutic effects without MTX, and the efficacy was maintained for 52 weeks with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ozoralizumab showed an acceptable tolerability profile over 52 weeks.

Tanaka Y., Kawanishi M., Nakanishi M., Yamasaki H., Takeuchi T.

ABSTRACT Objective To assess the efficacy and safety through a 52-week treatment with subcutaneous ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Methods This multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group confirmatory trial included a 24-week double-blind treatment period followed by a 28-week open-label treatment period. The double-blind treatment period randomized 381 (2:2:1) patients to placebo and ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg, and patients receiving placebo were re-randomized (1:1) to ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg in the open-label period. Results The ozoralizumab groups showed good clinical improvement, with high American College of Rheumatology response rates at 52 weeks, as well as good improvements in other endpoints, which were observed from Day 3 and maintained through Week 52. Furthermore, the ozoralizumab groups showed a high remission rate in clinical and functional remission at Week 52. Serious adverse events occurred in a total of 23 patients in the ozoralizumab groups, without differences in incidence between doses. Conclusions Ozoralizumab demonstrated significant therapeutic effects and efficacy, which was maintained for 52 weeks. The safety profile was consistent with the evaluated results in interim analysis at Week 24, and ozoralizumab was well-tolerated up to Week 52.

Takeuchi T., Kawanishi M., Nakanishi M., Yamasaki H., Tanaka Y.

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous administration of 30 mg or 80 mg of ozoralizumab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose disease remained active despite MTX therapy. Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase II/III trial, 381 patients were randomized to receive placebo, ozoralizumab 30 mg, or ozoralizumab 80 mg, plus MTX subcutaneously injected every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. The primary end points were the response rates based on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 16 and change in the Sharp/van der Heijde score (ΔSHS) from baseline to week 24. Results The proportion of patients with an ACR20 response at week 16 was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in both ozoralizumab groups (79.6% for 30 mg, 75.3% for 80 mg), compared with placebo (37.3%); these improvements were observed from the first week of treatment. The proportion of the patients with structural nonprogression (ΔSHS ≤0) was significantly higher in both ozoralizumab groups than in the placebo group. For some secondary end points, significantly greater improvements were observed starting from as early as day 3. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients in the ozoralizumab 30-mg group and 5 patients in the ozoralizumab 80-mg group. Conclusion In patients with active RA who received ozoralizumab in combination with MTX, the signs and symptoms of RA were significantly reduced as compared with the outcomes in those receiving placebo. Ozoralizumab demonstrated acceptable tolerability with no new safety signals when compared with other antibodies against tumor necrosis factor.

Evangelatos G., Bamias G., Kitas G.D., Kollias G., Sfikakis P.P.

Since the late 1990s, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (anti-TNFs) have revolutionized the therapy of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) affecting the gut, joints, skin and eyes. Although the therapeutic armamentarium in IMIDs is being constantly expanded, anti-TNFs remain the cornerstone of their treatment. During the second decade of their application in clinical practice, a large body of additional knowledge has accumulated regarding various aspects of anti-TNF-α therapy, whereas new indications have been added. Recent experimental studies have shown that anti-TNFs exert their beneficial effects not only by restoring aberrant TNF-mediated immune mechanisms, but also by de-activating pathogenic fibroblast-like mesenchymal cells. Real-world data on millions of patients further confirmed the remarkable efficacy of anti-TNFs. It is now clear that anti-TNFs alter the physical course of inflammatory arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, leading to inhibition of local and systemic bone loss and to a decline in the number of surgeries for disease-related complications, while anti-TNFs improve morbidity and mortality, acting beneficially also on cardiovascular comorbidities. On the other hand, no new safety signals emerged, whereas anti-TNF-α safety in pregnancy and amid the COVID-19 pandemic was confirmed. The use of biosimilars was associated with cost reductions making anti-TNFs more widely available. Moreover, the current implementation of the “treat-to-target” approach and treatment de-escalation strategies of IMIDs were based on anti-TNFs. An intensive search to discover biomarkers to optimize response to anti-TNF-α treatment is currently ongoing. Finally, selective targeting of TNF-α receptors, new forms of anti-TNFs and combinations with other agents, are being tested in clinical trials and will probably expand the spectrum of TNF-α inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for IMIDs.

Ishiwatari-Ogata C., Kyuuma M., Ogata H., Yamakawa M., Iwata K., Ochi M., Hori M., Miyata N., Fujii Y.

Although the introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors represented a significant advance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), traditional anti-TNFα antibodies are somewhat immunogenic, and their use results in the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and loss of efficacy (secondary failure). Ozoralizumab is a trivalent, bispecific NANOBODY® compound that differs structurally from IgGs. In this study we investigated the suppressant effect of ozoralizumab and adalimumab, an anti-TNFα IgG, on arthritis and induction of ADAs in human TNF transgenic mice. Ozoralizumab markedly suppressed arthritis progression and did not induce ADAs during long-term administration. We also developed an animal model of secondary failure by repeatedly administering adalimumab and found that switching from adalimumab to ozoralizumab was followed by superior anti-arthritis efficacy in the secondary-failure animal model. Moreover, ozoralizumab did not form large immune complexes that might lead to ADA formation. The results of our studies suggest that ozoralizumab, which exhibited low immunogenicity in the animal model used and has a different antibody structure from that of IgGs, is a promising candidate for the treatment of RA patients not only at the onset of RA but also during secondary failure of anti-TNFα treatment.

Katturajan R., S V., Rasool M., Evan Prince S.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune inflammatory systematic complication which is a chronic disorder that severely affects bones and joints and results in the quality of life impairment. Methotrexate (MTX), an FDA-approved drug has maintained the standard of care for treating patients affected with RA. The mechanism of MTX includes the inhibition of purine and pyrimidine synthesis, suppression of polyamine accumulation, promotion of adenosine release, adhesion of the inflammatory molecules, and controlling of cytokine cascade in RA. The recommended dose for RA patients is 5-25 mg of MTX per week, depending on the severity of the disease but MTX has proven to be cytotoxic with side effects affecting various tissues when treating RA patients even with low doses over a prolonged period of time. The mechanism of such toxicity is not entirely understood. This review strives to understand it by correlating the different pathways, including MTX in folate metabolism, Sirt1/Nrf2/γ-gcs, and γ-gcs/CaSR-TNF-α/NF-kB signaling. In addition to this, the importance of targeted therapy combination with MTX on RA treatment and combinations approved from the clinical trials are also briefly discussed. Overall, this review elucidates the various MTX molecular mechanisms and toxicity at the molecular level, the limitations, and the scope for future directions.

Fraenkel L., Bathon J.M., England B.R., St.Clair E.W., Arayssi T., Carandang K., Deane K.D., Genovese M., Huston K.K., Kerr G., Kremer J., Nakamura M.C., Russell L.A., Singh J.A., Smith B.J., et. al.

To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacologic management of rheumatoid arthritis.We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. A voting panel comprising clinicians and patients achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations.The guideline addresses treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including conventional synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs, and targeted synthetic DMARDs, use of glucocorticoids, and use of DMARDs in certain high-risk populations (i.e., those with liver disease, heart failure, lymphoproliferative disorders, previous serious infections, and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease). The guideline includes 44 recommendations (7 strong and 37 conditional).This clinical practice guideline is intended to serve as a tool to support clinician and patient decision-making. Recommendations are not prescriptive, and individual treatment decisions should be made through a shared decision-making process based on patients' values, goals, preferences, and comorbidities.