volume 59 issue 1 publication number 45

Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-12-24
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.650
CiteScore4.1
Impact factor2.8
ISSN2287979X, 22880011
Abstract

Large language models, specifically ChatGPT, are revolutionizing clinical research by improving content creation and providing specific useful features. These technologies can transform clinical research, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and results sharing. However, integrating these technologies into the academic writing workflow poses significant challenges. In this review, I investigated the integration of large-language model-based AI tools into clinical research, focusing on practical implementation strategies and addressing the ethical considerations associated with their use. Additionally, I provide examples of the safe and sound use of generative AI in clinical research and emphasize the need to ensure that AI-generated outputs are reliable and valid in scholarly writing settings. In conclusion, large language models are a powerful tool for organizing and expressing ideas efficiently; however, they have limitations. Writing an academic paper requires critical analysis and intellectual input from the authors. Moreover, AI-generated text must be carefully reviewed to reflect the authors’ insights. These AI tools significantly enhance the efficiency of repetitive research tasks, although challenges related to plagiarism detection and ethical use persist.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Blood Research
1 publication, 20%
Journal of Pain Research
1 publication, 20%
Revista de Neurologia
1 publication, 20%
American Journal of Surgery
1 publication, 20%
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
1 publication, 20%
1

Publishers

1
Springer Nature
1 publication, 20%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 20%
Viguera Editores
1 publication, 20%
Elsevier
1 publication, 20%
Wiley
1 publication, 20%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
5
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Lee J. Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies // Blood Research. 2024. Vol. 59. No. 1. 45
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Lee J. Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies // Blood Research. 2024. Vol. 59. No. 1. 45
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s44313-024-00045-3
UR - https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s44313-024-00045-3
TI - Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies
T2 - Blood Research
AU - Lee, Jeong-moo
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/12/24
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 1
VL - 59
PMID - 39718704
SN - 2287-979X
SN - 2288-0011
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Lee,
author = {Jeong-moo Lee},
title = {Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies},
journal = {Blood Research},
year = {2024},
volume = {59},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {dec},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s44313-024-00045-3},
number = {1},
pages = {45},
doi = {10.1007/s44313-024-00045-3}
}