Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
SCImago
Q3
SJR
0.235
CiteScore
1.3
Categories
Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Library and Information Sciences
Areas
Computer Science
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2015-2022, 2024
journal names
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Top-3 citing journals
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31355/313552498661254c5261c666137ec6bc462b7474" alt="Lecture Notes in Computer Science"
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
(227 citations)
Top-3 organizations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f673/2f67337682c4e2b71f26c30e1f9893287797bd3c" alt="University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign"
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
(128 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/834a7/834a7ca03e9a26501d079ca0d25a36e7b5fb1398" alt="Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey"
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
(77 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97995/97995953e7887e73ec15b26a9f36ec8b098e2594" alt="University of Texas at Austin"
University of Texas at Austin
(69 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f673/2f67337682c4e2b71f26c30e1f9893287797bd3c" alt="University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign"
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
(54 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7c7d/e7c7d827c7193bbc551236fd55b57075fd928f68" alt="Syracuse University"
Syracuse University
(42 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1617/f1617e06019273bbf2d918e6d0ecd4b560161dd6" alt="University of North Texas"
University of North Texas
(37 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 523
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Biological value of berry polyphenols and prospects for supercritical extraction application for their isolation: A review
Guseva E., Khromova N., Karetkin B., Artemiev A., Demkin K., Puzankova J., Shakir I., Panfilov V.
Plant polyphenols are known for their numerous health-promoting properties. This article reviews the current state of research in two related fields, namely beneficial effects of flavonoids for human health, e.g., gut microbiome, and supercritical fluid extraction applied to flavonoids of plant origin. The review covered research articles registered in eLIBRARY.RU, PubMed, and Science Direct in 2005–2025. Polyphenolic compounds obtained from various berries were reported to have a positive impact on gut microbiota, e.g., they stimulated the growth of lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, and other beneficial microorganisms, as well as improved the adhesion of probiotic and pathogenic microbes to intestinal epithelial cells.
The review revealed some promising application areas for berry extracts in the functional food industry. Polyphenols can be part of meat formulations due to their strong antioxidant activity. Their antimicrobial effect against a wide range of contaminants renders them good prospects in protecting food products from microbial spoilage. Supercritical extraction is a promising method that isolates biologically active substances from plant materials. The review summarizes its advantages and limitations, as well as the range of prospective co-solvents.
Ultrasonication, pulse electric field, and enzymic pretreatment make supercritical extraction more efficient. In general, this extraction method proved to be an excellent means of isolating flavonoids and related compounds from various plants and their parts.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Dietary consumption of pre-carcinogenic amines and mutagenicity in humans: An evidence-based study
Perveen I., Koser N., Khan R.S., Maqsood M., Saleem N., Alvi F.N., Aun S.M., Siddiqui M.F., Faridi T.A., Awan H.M., Saleem Y., Abbas N., Mazhar S., Nawaz S., Syed Q., et. al.
Dietary consumption of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAA) is considered to be a high-risk factor that substantially contributes to the development of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in humans. This study provides ample evidence for the plausible association between mutagenicity or carcinogenicity development and dietary intake of heterocyclic amines in humans. The current study intends to assess the degree of heterocyclic amine contaminants in high-temperature cooked meats, their subsequent food intake, and potential health risk estimations.
The meat samples were homogenized, filtered, extracted, and eluted. The list of heterocyclic amines to be identified and quantified included PhIP (2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b] pyridine), IQ (2-amino-3-methyl-imidazo[4,5-f] quinolone), and MeIQx (2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoxaline). They were simultaneously isolated and studied using the method of high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). The highest heterocyclic amine concentration was found in chicken (2705.99 ± 6.12 ng/g), beef (574.09 ± 1.52 ng/g), and mutton (342.41 ± 3.69 ng/g). PhIP (73%) was the main heterocyclic amine in chicken. The estimated daily dietary intake or exposure in chicken, mutton, and beef was 0.690, 0.050, and 0.144 ng/kg body weight, respectively. The values for margin of exposure were within the range identified by the European Food Safety Authority for mutton (102.06) and chicken (13.250), but not for beef (3.784).
This significantly high prevalence of heterocyclic amines and the associated health risks are sufficient to warn the public about the high dietary intake of meat and its carcinogenic health hazards. The mutational patterns induced by heterocyclic amines resemble those in human tumors, requiring the use of specific biomarkers like HAA-DNA and HAA-protein adducts. Future prospects are high for integrating these biomarkers into epidemiological studies, which could provide a comprehensive assessment of health risks associated with dietary heterocyclic aromatic amines in human cancer.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Predictive analytics of cattle behavior using machine learning techniques: A case study
El Moutaouakil K., Falih N., Doumi K.
Livestock management is a critical aspect of agricultural sustainability and food security. Today, there is a pressing need for advanced tools in cattle behavior analysis to improve livestock welfare and productivity. We aimed to enhance cattle behavior classification by using accelerometers fitted in wearable collars. Deep learning techniques were employed to classify behavioral patterns in cattle such as feeding, moving, and lying. Ultimately, our study sought to improve livestock management practices, including the monitoring of health and overall well-being.
The study was conducted in a local barn, where cattle were outfitted with specially designed collars with accelerometer sensors. These sensors recorded intricate movements, facilitating the collection of comprehensive behavioral data. Deep learning algorithms were used to process and analyze the accelerometer data, enabling precise classification of various behaviors exhibited by the cattle.
Our results showed the effectiveness of AI-driven classification techniques in distinguishing cattle behaviors with a high degree of accuracy. Our findings underscore the potential of deep learning techniques in optimizing livestock management practices.
This research significantly advances livestock management by offering a simple continuous monitoring solution for cattle behavior. Deep learning techniques not only enhance our understanding of cattle behavior but also pave the way for intelligent systems that empower farmers to make informed decisions. By promoting healthier and more productive livestock, this research contributes to the broader goal of enhancing global food security and sustainability in the livestock industry.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Fermented buttermilk drinks fortified by plant raw materials
Reshetnik E., Gribanova S., Derzhapolskaya Y., Li C., Liu L., Zhang G., Korneva N., Shkolnikov P.
The research featured fortified fermented drinks from pasteurized buttermilk with such natural additives as Jerusalem artichoke syrup and beetroot dietary fiber.
The optimal symbiotic culture included Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus: it provided rapid fermentation and a creamy, homogeneous structure with delta pH time = 3.5 h. Jerusalem artichoke syrup was added in amounts of 3, 6, and 9%. Its optimal share proved to be 6% by the weight of the finished product. Beet dietary fiber was added in amounts of 2, 4, and 6%, where the optimal amount was 4%. A higher percentage affected the consistency of the finished product but not its clotting or taste. The experimental drinks were produced by the tank method and fermented at 42 ± 2°C until dense clotting and titratable acidity = 72 ± 2°T. The finished product was stored at 4 ± 2°C. The shelf-life was 12 days for the sample with Jerusalem artichoke syrup and 14 days for the drink fortified with beetroot fiber. The physical and chemical indicators showed that the energy value of the fortified fermented buttermilk drinks was on average 45.3% lower compared to conventional fermented dairy drinks.
As a result of research, it has been established that the use of plant components, namely Jerusalem artichoke syrup and beet dietary fiber in the production technology of fermented milk drink from buttermilk makes it possible to obtain a finished product with improved consumer properties.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Stabilizing fish oil during storage with Satureja bachtiarica Bunge
Matbo A., Ghanbari M.M., Sekhavatizadeh S.S., Nikkhah M.
Fish oil is highly susceptible to lipid oxidation, which leads to safety loss during storage. Natural antioxidants can prevent lipid oxidation. Satureja bachtiarica Bunge, also known as savory, is an endemic species plant that contains the necessary bioactive compounds and possesses antioxidant activity suitable for this purpose. This study featured the effects of savory extract and its essential oil as stabilizing agents on kilka fish oil.
We assessed the oxidative stability of fish oil fortified with of savory extract and essential oil in amounts of 0.5 and 1%. Then we compared their oxidative activity with that of samples treated with a synthetic antioxidant during 35 days at 40°C. The fish oil samples were tested for antioxidant activity, acid degree value, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, para-anisidine value, conjugated dienoic acids, peroxide value, total oxidation value, and free fatty acids.
Savory essential oil at the concentration of 1% was more effective than other samples in reducing the rate of lipid oxidation in fish oil. On storage day 35, the control sample yielded the following data: peroxide value = 14.79 meq O2/kg, acid degree value = 32.49 mL/g, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances = 5.82 mg MDA/g, para-anisidine value = 116.03, total oxidation index = 136.27. These results were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those in the sample with 1 % savory essential oil: peroxide value = 9.52 meq O2/kg, acid degree value = 22.41 mL/g, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances = 3.46 mg MDA/g, para-anisidine value = 78.3, total oxidation index = 108.09. The fish oil samples contained more unsaturated fatty acids (66.76–68.83%) than saturated fatty acids (31.13–32.6%).
Savory essential oil demonstrated good potential as an effective natural antioxidant that extends the shelf life of fish oil.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Optimizing the utilization of pomelo (Citrus maxima (Brum.) Merr.) seeds as a quality dietary fiber
Budianto B., Suparmi A., Susanti D.
Orange seeds, often overlooked as waste, have hidden potential since fiber derived from them contains numerous biochemical substances that can enhance the nutritional value of food. We aimed to investigate the impact of pomelo seed fiber on the biscuit dough’s properties (starch and gluten), physicochemical characteristics, and biochemistry, as well as the product’s shelf life.
We studied three types of samples: control (no dietary fiber), biscuits with dietary fiber from pomelo (Citrus maxima (Brum.) Merr.) seeds, and biscuits with wheat germ fiber. Scanning electron microscopy was employed to analyze rubbery starch and gluten in the dough, while response surface methods were used to optimize the biscuits’ strength via a central composite design. The product’s shelf life was determined based on microbial contamination levels. ANOVA test and Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference post hoc test were performed to assess the differences in physicochemical and biochemical properties.
Citrus seed fiber influenced rubbery starch and gluten properties, causing significant differences (p < 0.05) in fracturability, total dietary fiber, and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity among the three samples. The biscuits enriched with citrus seed fiber contained flavonoid compounds and acylserotonin, with acyl-Nω-methylserotonin dominating in the C22 and C24 homologs. Despite varied evaluations in texture and aroma, the biscuits with citrus seed fiber were well-received for their taste and boasted an extended shelf life (> 12 months).
Dietary fiber obtained from C. maxima seeds not only enhanced the nutritional value of the biscuits but also paved the way for innovative healthy food opportunities.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
BOX-PCR and ERIC-PCR evaluation for genotyping Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in raw milk
Maurice Bilung L., Radzi E.S., Tahar A.S., Zulkharnain A., Ngui R., Apun K.
Over the past decade, the occurrence of milk-borne infections caused by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) has adversely affected consumer health and the milk industry.
We aimed to detect and genotype the strains of E. coli and S. Typhimurium isolated from cow and goat milks using two genotyping tools, BOX-PCR and ERIC-PCR. A total of 200 cow and goat milk samples were collected from the dairy farms in Southern Sarawak, Malaysia.
First, E. coli and Salmonella spp. detected in the samples were characterized using PCRs to identify pathogenic strains, STEC and S. Typhimurium. Next, the bacterial strains were genotyped using ERIC-PCR and BOX-PCR to determine their genetic relatedness. Out of 200 raw milk samples, 46.5% tested positive for non-STEC, 39.5% showed the presence of S. Typhimurium, and 11% were positive for STEC. The two genotyping tools showed different discrimination indexes, with BOX-PCR exhibiting a higher index mean (0.991) compared to ERIC-PCR (0.937). This suggested that BOX-PCR had better discriminatory power for genotyping the bacteria.
Our study provides information on the safety of milk sourced from dairy farms, underscoring the importance of regular inspections and surveillance at the farm level to minimize the risk of E. coli and Salmonella outbreaks from milk consumption.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
The phytochemical composition of Kuzbass medicinal plants studied by spectrophotometry and chromatography
Velichkovich N., Dunchenko N., Stepanova A., Kozlova O., Faskhutdinova E., Yustratov V., Luzyanin S.
Flavonoids are plant polyphenols that exhibit biological activity with antibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimutagenic, and anticarcinogenic effects. The medicinal plants of Kuzbass have high contents of flavonoids and other polyphenolic compounds. Therefore, they can be used in medicinal preparations to prevent or treat serious diseases.
We studied the following plants collected in Kuzbass: common thyme (Thymus vulgaris Linn., leaves and stems), woolly burdock (Arctium tomentosum Mill., roots), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L., leaves and stems), common lungwort (Pulmonaria officinalis L., leaves and stems), common yarrow (Achillea millefolium L., leaves and stems), red clover (Trifolium pratense L., leaves and stems), common ginseng (Panax ginseng, roots), sweetvetch (Hedysarum neglectum Ledeb., roots), and cow parsnip (Heracleum sibiricum L., inflorescences, leaves, and stems). To extract flavonoids, we used ethanol at concentrations of 40, 55, 60, 70, and 75%. Spectrophotometry was used to determine total flavonoids, while high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to study the qualitative and quantitative composition of the extracts.
The highest yield of flavonoids was found in H. sibiricum leaves (at all concentrations except 70%), followed by the 55% and 70% ethanol extracts of T. vulgaris leaves and stems, as well as the 75% ethanol extract of A. millefolium leaves and stems. Thus, these plants have the greatest potential in being used in medicines. High-performance liquid chromatography showed the highest contents of polyphenolic compounds in the samples of P. officinalis, A. millefolium, T. vulgaris, and T. pratense.
Our results can be used in further research to produce new medicinal preparations based on the medicinal plants of Kuzbass.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Aurelia aurita jellyfish collagen: Recovery properties
Barzkar N., Sukhikh S., Zhikhreva A., Cheliubeeva E., Kapitunova A., Malkov D., Babich O., Kulikova Y.
Wound and burn healing is a complex physiological process that can be facilitated by medications based on marine collagen. In this regard, biomass of the Aurelia aurita jellyfish is a promising alternative source of medical collagen. As the global incidence of burns and wounds continues to grow, new healing methods have become a relevant area of medical science.
This study featured acetic acid as a means of marine collagen extraction from A. aurita biomass. The physical and chemical properties of jellyfish collagen were determined gravimetrically and included such indicators as water solubility and water holding capacity. The molecular weight was defined by gel electrophoresis. The spectral studies relied on the method of UV spectroscopy. The regenerative experiments included such parameters as cytotoxicity, antioxidant properties, adhesion, and wound healing rate, as well as a quantitative PCR analysis.
The optimal conditions for maximal collagen yield were as follows: 0.5 M acetic acid and 48 h extraction time. However, the collagen yield was very low (≤ 0.0185%). The high water holding capacity showed good prospects for A. aurita collagen to be used as hemostatic sponge. The acid-soluble collagen sample had a molecular weight of 100–115 kDa, which made it possible to classify it as type I. A. aurita jellyfish collagen revealed no cytotoxic properties; it had no effect on adhesion, migration, and proliferation of keratinocytes, neither did it affect the expression of cell differentiation markers.
The wound healing model proved that the marine collagen had regenerative properties as it was able to increase the wound healing rate by 24.5%. Therefore, collagen extracted from the biomass of A. aurita jellyfish d emonstrated good p rospects for cosmetology and regenerative medicine.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Ultra-high-pressure homogenization in chicory root juice production
Aksu M.I., Erkovan H.I., Erkovan S.
The demand for freshly squeezed natural fruit juices has increased in recent years, however their shelf life is quite short. Thermal processes applied to extend the shelf life of such products and increase their storage stability cause significant losses in color and other sensory properties, depending on the temperature applied. Therefore, the preference for high-pressure homogenization as an alternative to thermal processes is on the rise. We aimed to determine effects of ultra-high-pressure homogenization and production stages on some quality properties of chicory root juice.
Ultra-high-pressure homogenization was applied at the pressure levels of 0 (Control), 50, 100, 150, and 200 MPA. The samples also included juice after homogenization with an ULTRA-TURRAX disperser and after a water bath.
Ultra-high-pressure homogenization affected such quality characteristics of chicory root juice as total soluble solids (p < 0.01), pH (p < 0.01), L* (p < 0.01), a* (p < 0.01), b* (p < 0.01), a*/b* (p < 0.01), chroma (p < 0.01), hue angle (p < 0.01), and total color difference ΔE (p < 0.01). Higher levels of ultra-high-pressure homogenization pressure increased pH (p < 0.05), a* values (p < 0.05), and the a/b* ratio (p < 0.05) but reduced L* (p < 0.05), b* (p < 0.05), chroma (p < 0.05), and hue angle (p < 0.05) values of the juice samples. Thus, the use of ultra-high-pressure homogenization (100 and 200 MPa) contributed to improving the total soluble solids and redness values of chicory root juice.
Our study showed that the ultra-high-pressure homogenization process improved the quality of chicory root juice.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Multi-objective development of novel egg free cakes using quinoa protein and its quality attributes
Mohamed R.K., Ahmed Z.S., Abozed S.S.
This study explores the potential of utilizing quinoa protein as an egg substitute in bakery products for customers with health, culture/religion, or dietary restrictions.
Quinoa protein was prepared from quinoa seed by alkaline solubilization followed by isoelectric precipitation and drying. Four different formulations of egg-free cakes were prepared by incorporating quinoa protein in egg equivalents of 50 g (Formulation 1), 75 g (Formulation 2), 100 g (Formulation 3), and 150 g (Formulation 4). The research involved Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and revealed such functional properties as proximate composition, physical properties, color, texture, microstructure, and sensory characteristics for the batters and the cakes.
The incorporation of different quinoa protein concentrations significantly (p < 0.05) affected all the functional properties of the batters and the cakes. Such variables as crude protein and ash increased while moisture and fat contents decreased. The baking loss went down as the share of quinoa protein went up. The structural analysis showed an increase in gumminess and chewiness accompanied by a decrease in cohesiveness and elasticity. The analysis also revealed hardness and non-uniform changes. The lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) of the cake surface and crumb decreased while the redness (a*) increased.
The cakes prepared according to Formulation 4 with the greatest share of quinoa protein had a high nutritional value with reasonable concentrations of essential amino acids in general and a high level of lysine in particular. The same sample also received the highest score for overall sensory properties. The sensory assessment proved that quinoa protein could meet consumer expectations of egg-free cakes.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Innovative physical techniques in freeze-drying
Andreeva O., Shorstkii I.
Malnutrition is a global problem that is caused by insufficient sources of vitamins, microelements, and other nutrients. This creates a need for developing long-term preservation techniques. One of the solutions is to pre-treat food materials before freeze-drying by applying advanced and safe electrophysical techniques instead of traditional thermomechanical methods.
We reviewed three of the most promising electrophysical techniques (low-temperature plasma, ultrasound, and pulsed electric field) which have proven effective for a wide range of food materials. In particular, we focused on their mechanism of action and the equipment required, drawing on successful laboratory and large-scale studies in Russia and abroad.
The electrophysical techniques under review had an etching effect on the material, caused electroporation, and changed the material’s internal structure. In addition to these effects, we described their process and technology, as well as their advantages and disadvantages in industrial applications.
Based on literature analysis, we stressed the importance of developing innovative electrophysical techniques for the food industry. These techniques should ensure high energy efficiency of the freeze-drying process and maintain good quality characteristics of food products.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Lycopene from tomato biomass: Extraction and stabilization
Murillo Vazquez R.N., Pacheco Moises F.P., Nardello-Rataj V., Carbajal Arizaga G.G.
Lycopene and other carotenoids have a significant added value in the food and cosmetic industries due to their nutraceutical properties and antioxidant activity. The extraction and stabilization of these compounds remain challenging due to their sensitivity to light, temperature fluctuations, and oxidation. This article introduces a sustainable method of extracting lycopene from tomato waste (Solanum lycopersicum L.) using layered double hydroxide nanoparticles to stabilize lycopene.
We used tomato juice and lycopene as a positive control, while ZnAl was a negative control. The experimental samples included 75 and 100 mg of zinc salt per 1 mL of tomato juice, which were labeled as ZnAl75J and ZnAl100J.
Zinc and aluminum salts developed insoluble hydroxides, which precipitated lycopene from tomato juice, thus forming composites. The composites proved to be efficient means of encapsulating lycopene as they recovered 97% lycopene present in tomato juice. The physicochemical properties of the organic material enhanced resistance to thermal degradation and acted as an extended-release antioxidant. ZnAl100J, which contained a lot of lycopene, inhibited 89% of DPPH• in 24 h and showed a value higher than IC50 for ABTS•+, which was 0.02 μg/mL of TEAC ABTS•+. ZnAl75J composites showed a higher protection against oxidation and a higher sun protection factor value (3.08) at 15% concentration.
The composites could be used as an active ingredient in a wide range of formulations that require antioxidant and photosensitizing properties, or simply as encapsulators and carriers of lycopene.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Autumn and winter diet of wood pigeon (Columba palumbus) in the Central Ciscaucasia
Kaledin A., Malovichko L., Rezanov A., Drozdova L., Kentbaeva B.
The wood pigeon (Columba palumbus) is the largest pigeon in Russia: an adult bird weighs max. 620 g. Its population in Central Ciscaucasia is quite numerous, which makes it a popular object of sports hunting. However, very little is known about its diet and feeding habits. This article describes the seasonal features of C. palumbus diet during the hunting season in the Stavropol Region, Russia.
The study relied on the analysis of foods extracted from 66 crops and stomachs of wood pigeons killed by hunters or hit by road vehicles in various biotopes in 25 districts of the Stavropol Region.
In the steppe areas, wood pigeons usually inhabit summer gardens, orchards, vineyards, and green belts along fields, roads, and railways. Wood pigeons are phytophages, which means they feed on plants. Their autumn diet includes sunflower seeds (17.98% occurrence rate, 19.68% total diet), corn grains (15.11 and 9.56%, respectively), wheat (14.39 and 9.98%), flax (6.47 and 10.4%), and millet (2.88 and 4.82%), as well as seeds of wild plants, e.g., wild vetch (7.19 and 3.14%), catchweed (5.75 and 6.25%), trailing bindweed (2.88 and 4.27%), etc.
The wood pigeon inhabits all districts of the Stavropol Region, which makes it a promising game bird species. In addition to cultivated plants, e.g., wheat, sunflower, peas, and corn, wood pigeons feed on a wide range of weeds. The research results contribute to scientific data on C. palumbus as a game bird and cast light upon some of its feeding patterns.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Physicochemical, rheological, and microbiological properties of honey-fortified probiotic drinkable yogurt
Albay Z., Celebi M., Simsek B.
This study aimed to investigate the physicochemical, rheological, and microbiological attributes of drinkable yogurts prepared with three distinct types of honey (flower, pine, and thyme) in amounts of 10 and 20% and probiotic cultures (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp.).
The control sample was brighter while the yogurt containing 20% pine honey was more yellow during storage (21 days). The samples’ serum separation quantities rose together with the honey ratio. All the honey-fortified drinkable yogurts were found to be non-Newtonian pseudoplastic liquids that are thixotropic. However, as the honey ratio increased, the apparent viscosity and consistency coefficients increased, too. After 21 days of storage, L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. counts rose to more than 5.0 log CFU/mL in the experimental yogurts containing honey (except for the sample with 20% flower honey). The panelists preferred the 10% honey-fortified drinkable yogurts over the others. The yogurts with flower honey were mostly favored, followed by pine and thyme honeys. Although honey contributed to the properties of drinkable yogurt, adding more than 10% of honey degraded the product’s quality and acceptability.
In conclusion, 10% is an optimal amount for flower and pine honey, with a smaller amount recommended for thyme honey. More research is needed on honey-fortified drinkable yogurt for its commercial production.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
|
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
398 citations, 7.53%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
227 citations, 4.29%
|
|
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
190 citations, 3.59%
|
|
Journal of Documentation
150 citations, 2.84%
|
|
Scientometrics
84 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Aslib Journal of Information Management
68 citations, 1.29%
|
|
Information Processing and Management
63 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
57 citations, 1.08%
|
|
IEEE Access
56 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
50 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Library and Information Science Research
47 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Journal of Information Science
44 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
40 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Sustainability
36 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Information and Learning Science
34 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Journal of Informetrics
33 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
31 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
31 citations, 0.59%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
30 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Journal of Academic Librarianship
26 citations, 0.49%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
24 citations, 0.45%
|
|
PLoS ONE
24 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Electronic Library
23 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
23 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Online Information Review
23 citations, 0.44%
|
|
IFLA Journal
19 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
18 citations, 0.34%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
18 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Information (Switzerland)
18 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Library Hi Tech
18 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
18 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication
18 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
17 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
16 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
16 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Library Quarterly
16 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
16 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
15 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Public Library Quarterly
15 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Education for Information
14 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Human Computer Studies
14 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Information Discovery and Delivery
14 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Heliyon
14 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Learned Publishing
13 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Quantitative Science Studies
13 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
12 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Social Network Analysis and Mining
12 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Information Communication and Society
12 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
12 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
11 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Information Development
11 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Studies in Computational Intelligence
11 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services
11 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Accountability in Research
11 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation
11 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Robots in Academic Libraries
11 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Digital Library Perspectives
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Health Information and Libraries Journal
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Social Media and Society
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Data and Information Management
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Behaviour and Information Technology
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Education Sciences
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Healthcare
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Information and Library Review
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Library Management
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
New Media and Society
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
British Journal of Educational Technology
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Library Administration
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence in Data and Big Data Processing
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Big Data and Society
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Library Metadata
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Reference Services Review
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Internet Research
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Information Systems Frontiers
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Advances in Librarianship
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AI and Society
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AI and Ethics
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Neural Approaches to Conversational Information Retrieval
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Scientific data
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Interactive Learning Environments
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Knowledge-Based Systems
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Information Management
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal on Digital Libraries
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Science and Technology Libraries
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Telematics and Informatics
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Libri
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
Springer Nature
915 citations, 17.31%
|
|
Wiley
730 citations, 13.81%
|
|
Elsevier
559 citations, 10.58%
|
|
Emerald
486 citations, 9.19%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
389 citations, 7.36%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
331 citations, 6.26%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
288 citations, 5.45%
|
|
SAGE
246 citations, 4.65%
|
|
MDPI
217 citations, 4.11%
|
|
IGI Global
110 citations, 2.08%
|
|
JMIR Publications
78 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
72 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
33 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Oxford University Press
33 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
31 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
26 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
21 citations, 0.4%
|
|
IOS Press
20 citations, 0.38%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
18 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
18 citations, 0.34%
|
|
MIT Press
14 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
12 citations, 0.23%
|
|
IOP Publishing
12 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
11 citations, 0.21%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
11 citations, 0.21%
|
|
AIP Publishing
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
PeerJ
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
World Scientific
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
F1000 Research
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
OpenEdition
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IntechOpen
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
4 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Royal Society
4 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
4 citations, 0.08%
|
|
BMJ
4 citations, 0.08%
|
|
State Public Scientific Technological Library SB RAS
4 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Polish Librarians' Association
4 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Copernicus
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SciELO
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Open Journal
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information - VINITI RAS
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Massachusetts Medical School
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Tech Science Press
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
EDP Sciences
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Brill
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of York
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Information Processing Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Centro Nacional de Informacion y Documentacion Cientifica
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ain Shams University
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
State Public Scientific-Technical Library
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
SLACK
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cogitatio
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Jones and Barlett Publishers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
ifmbe proceedings
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Management
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Medical Informatics
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Learning Technology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
World Health Organization
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Gyandhara International Academic Publications
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
United Kingdom Serials Group (UKSG)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Informationsmanagement in der Biotechnologie e.V. (IMBio e.V.)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Food Protection
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Association of Professional Managers in South Africa
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
128 publications, 6.79%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
77 publications, 4.09%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
69 publications, 3.66%
|
|
University of Tennessee
65 publications, 3.45%
|
|
Wuhan University
61 publications, 3.24%
|
|
University of North Texas
61 publications, 3.24%
|
|
University of Washington
59 publications, 3.13%
|
|
Syracuse University
58 publications, 3.08%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
55 publications, 2.92%
|
|
University of British Columbia
51 publications, 2.71%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
51 publications, 2.71%
|
|
Drexel University
46 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
44 publications, 2.34%
|
|
National Taiwan University
43 publications, 2.28%
|
|
Nanjing University
41 publications, 2.18%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
40 publications, 2.12%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
39 publications, 2.07%
|
|
McGill University
34 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Peking University
33 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of Michigan
32 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
30 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Western University
30 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Toronto
29 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
28 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
24 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Florida State University
22 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University of South Australia
21 publications, 1.11%
|
|
San Jose State University
21 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Arizona
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Kentucky
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University College Dublin
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
18 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
17 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
16 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
16 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Alabama
16 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Uppsala University
14 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
14 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
14 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
14 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
14 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
14 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
14 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Alberta
14 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Renmin University of China
13 publications, 0.69%
|
|
City, University of London
13 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Louisiana State University
13 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Denver
13 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of South Florida
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Sheffield
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
11 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Melbourne
11 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
11 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Nankai University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Georgetown University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Edinburgh Napier University
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Zhejiang University
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Tampere University
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Oulu
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Pretoria
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of the Punjab
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Central China Normal University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
East China Normal University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Åbo Akademi University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Catholic University of America
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Seville
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Kiel University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Indiana University Indianapolis
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Borås
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Cornell University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Wayne State University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
McMaster University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Leiden University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
East Carolina University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Ottawa
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Texas A&M University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Jerusalem College of Technology
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Central University of Finance and Economics
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University College London
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Oslo
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Glasgow
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Kyungpook National University
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
George Mason University
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
54 publications, 5.37%
|
|
Syracuse University
42 publications, 4.18%
|
|
University of North Texas
37 publications, 3.68%
|
|
University of Tennessee
37 publications, 3.68%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
33 publications, 3.28%
|
|
Wuhan University
32 publications, 3.18%
|
|
Nanjing University
28 publications, 2.79%
|
|
University of Washington
27 publications, 2.69%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
26 publications, 2.59%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
24 publications, 2.39%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
22 publications, 2.19%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
22 publications, 2.19%
|
|
National Taiwan University
21 publications, 2.09%
|
|
University of Michigan
21 publications, 2.09%
|
|
Drexel University
19 publications, 1.89%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
19 publications, 1.89%
|
|
University of Arizona
16 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of British Columbia
16 publications, 1.59%
|
|
McGill University
15 publications, 1.49%
|
|
University of Toronto
15 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Peking University
14 publications, 1.39%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
14 publications, 1.39%
|
|
San Jose State University
14 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
12 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
12 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
11 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Western University
11 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Alabama
11 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Uppsala University
10 publications, 1%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
10 publications, 1%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
10 publications, 1%
|
|
University of South Australia
10 publications, 1%
|
|
University College Dublin
10 publications, 1%
|
|
Renmin University of China
9 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Kentucky
9 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
8 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Zhejiang University
7 publications, 0.7%
|
|
City, University of London
7 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
7 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
7 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Sheffield
7 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Denver
7 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Edinburgh Napier University
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Florida State University
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Cornell University
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Melbourne
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Pretoria
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of South Florida
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
East Carolina University
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of the Punjab
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Jerusalem College of Technology
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Oulu
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University College London
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
George Mason University
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Louisiana State University
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Central University of Gujarat
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Tampere University
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Nankai University
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Central University of Finance and Economics
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
East China Normal University
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Kyungpook National University
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Seville
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Indiana University Indianapolis
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Texas Woman's University
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Stockholm University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Bern University of Applied Sciences
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Glasgow
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Yonsei University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Northwestern University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Catholic University of America
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Harvard University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Wayne State University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
McMaster University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Regensburg
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Alberta
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Ottawa
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Old Dominion University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Regina
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1190, 63.16%
USA
1190 publications, 63.16%
|
China
|
China, 360, 19.11%
China
360 publications, 19.11%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 218, 11.57%
Canada
218 publications, 11.57%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 100, 5.31%
Australia
100 publications, 5.31%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 74, 3.93%
United Kingdom
74 publications, 3.93%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 65, 3.45%
Germany
65 publications, 3.45%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 52, 2.76%
Singapore
52 publications, 2.76%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 33, 1.75%
Japan
33 publications, 1.75%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 32, 1.7%
Republic of Korea
32 publications, 1.7%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 29, 1.54%
Israel
29 publications, 1.54%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 27, 1.43%
Sweden
27 publications, 1.43%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 23, 1.22%
Ireland
23 publications, 1.22%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 22, 1.17%
Finland
22 publications, 1.17%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 19, 1.01%
South Africa
19 publications, 1.01%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 16, 0.85%
New Zealand
16 publications, 0.85%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 15, 0.8%
Netherlands
15 publications, 0.8%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 14, 0.74%
Bangladesh
14 publications, 0.74%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 12, 0.64%
Brazil
12 publications, 0.64%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 12, 0.64%
Denmark
12 publications, 0.64%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 12, 0.64%
Norway
12 publications, 0.64%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 11, 0.58%
Croatia
11 publications, 0.58%
|
India
|
India, 9, 0.48%
India
9 publications, 0.48%
|
France
|
France, 8, 0.42%
France
8 publications, 0.42%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 8, 0.42%
Spain
8 publications, 0.42%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 8, 0.42%
Pakistan
8 publications, 0.42%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 7, 0.37%
Italy
7 publications, 0.37%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 7, 0.37%
Qatar
7 publications, 0.37%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 6, 0.32%
Chile
6 publications, 0.32%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 0.32%
Switzerland
6 publications, 0.32%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 0.21%
Portugal
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 4, 0.21%
Slovenia
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 3, 0.16%
Hungary
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.16%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.16%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.16%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.11%
Austria
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.11%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.11%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 2, 0.11%
Kyrgyzstan
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.11%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.11%
Poland
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.11%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.11%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.05%
Russia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.05%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.05%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.05%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.05%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.05%
Iran
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.05%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.05%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.05%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.05%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.05%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.05%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.05%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.05%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.05%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.05%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (29 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
USA
|
USA, 614, 61.09%
USA
614 publications, 61.09%
|
China
|
China, 201, 20%
China
201 publications, 20%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 105, 10.45%
Canada
105 publications, 10.45%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 47, 4.68%
Australia
47 publications, 4.68%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 46, 4.58%
United Kingdom
46 publications, 4.58%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 32, 3.18%
Germany
32 publications, 3.18%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 30, 2.99%
Singapore
30 publications, 2.99%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 17, 1.69%
Israel
17 publications, 1.69%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 16, 1.59%
Sweden
16 publications, 1.59%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 16, 1.59%
South Africa
16 publications, 1.59%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 15, 1.49%
Japan
15 publications, 1.49%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 14, 1.39%
Republic of Korea
14 publications, 1.39%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 13, 1.29%
Ireland
13 publications, 1.29%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 13, 1.29%
Finland
13 publications, 1.29%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 12, 1.19%
Bangladesh
12 publications, 1.19%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 12, 1.19%
New Zealand
12 publications, 1.19%
|
India
|
India, 7, 0.7%
India
7 publications, 0.7%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 7, 0.7%
Croatia
7 publications, 0.7%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 6, 0.6%
Pakistan
6 publications, 0.6%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 5, 0.5%
Spain
5 publications, 0.5%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 0.5%
Netherlands
5 publications, 0.5%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.5%
Norway
5 publications, 0.5%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 4, 0.4%
Brazil
4 publications, 0.4%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 4, 0.4%
Denmark
4 publications, 0.4%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 4, 0.4%
Italy
4 publications, 0.4%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 0.4%
Switzerland
4 publications, 0.4%
|
France
|
France, 3, 0.3%
France
3 publications, 0.3%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.3%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.3%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.3%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.3%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.3%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.3%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.3%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.3%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.2%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.2%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.2%
Poland
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.2%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.2%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.1%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.1%
Austria
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.1%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.1%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.1%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.1%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.1%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.1%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.1%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.1%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.1%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.1%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.1%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.1%
Chile
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.1%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Show all (21 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
1 profile journal article
Blikstein Paulo
121 publications,
2 461 citations
h-index: 26