Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan
Amer Mahmoud Sindiani
1
,
Nail Obeidat
1
,
Eman Alshdaifat
2
,
Lina Elsalem
3
,
Mustafa Alwani
4
,
H. Rawashdeh
1
,
Ahmad S Fares
4
,
Tamara Alalawne
4
,
Loai Tawalbeh
5
4
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2020-11-01
wos Q2
SJR: —
CiteScore: —
Impact factor: 1.6
ISSN: 20490801
PubMed ID:
33042535
General Medicine
Surgery
Abstract
In the spot of the new emerging COVID-19 pandemic and its major impact worldwide on day-to-day activities many rules had to be changed in order to fight this pandemic. Lockdown started in Jordan and around the globe affecting several aspects of life including economy, education, entertainment, and government policies. Regarding education, the priority was to ensure the safety and progress of the educational process. Thus, new methods of teaching had to be applied using the online learning at Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), Faculty of Medicine. This study was done to assess (1) Class Experience (2) Students and Lecturers' Interaction (3) Online Learning Advantages & Disadvantages (4) Students' Preference.A cross sectional study was conducted Convenience sampling technique was used to collect the data from the participants using a survey composed of 18 questions on Google Forms platform. A link was sent to the undergraduate medical students at the Jordan University of Science & Technology via their e-learning accounts (n = 3700). The form was available from May 22nd, 2020 to May 30th, 2020 for 8 days long. Data analysis was done using SPSS V 23.2212 out of 3700 students responded, (55.8%) of them were in the basic years and (44.2%) of them were in the clinical years. (55.8%) of students started to take online lectures after 3 weeks. (45.7%) used the hybrid teaching method (asynchronous and synchronous), (31.4%) used live classes, and 22.8% recorded classes. Zoom was the most used platform. (48.7%) and (57%) of clinical students and basic students express their interaction as bad, while the others had good and excellent interaction. Maintaining social distance was the most advantage of online teaching, while poor technical setup and no direct contact were the most disadvantage, furthermore inability to have real clinical access was a significant problem for clinical students (p < .001). With reference to students' preferences 75% of students were not pleased with their experience and 42% of students prefer to integrate online learning with traditional learning.Most medical students at JUST preferred the traditional face-to-face teaching method over the solo online teaching methods with recommendations to convert to a more integrated educational system. Also, a well-established infrastructure should be done in involving online teaching.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
|
|
BMC Medical Education
9 publications, 8.91%
|
|
|
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
6 publications, 5.94%
|
|
|
Education Sciences
3 publications, 2.97%
|
|
|
Heliyon
3 publications, 2.97%
|
|
|
F1000Research
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Education
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
BMC psychology
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
Behavioral Sciences
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
Interactive Learning Environments
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
Medical Education Online
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
Quality and Quantity
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
PeerJ
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Mathematics
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Medical Science Educator
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Universal Access in the Information Society
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Building and Environment
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Applied Soft Computing Journal
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Nursing Forum
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
Publishers
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
|
Springer Nature
21 publications, 20.79%
|
|
|
Elsevier
14 publications, 13.86%
|
|
|
MDPI
10 publications, 9.9%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
9 publications, 8.91%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
7 publications, 6.93%
|
|
|
IGI Global
3 publications, 2.97%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 2.97%
|
|
|
Wiley
3 publications, 2.97%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3 publications, 2.97%
|
|
|
F1000 Research
2 publications, 1.98%
|
|
|
Emerald
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
PeerJ
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
American Physiological Society
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Association for the Development of Science, Engineering and Education
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Gazi University
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Anadolu University
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
MANAS Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
Modestum Ltd
1 publication, 0.99%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
101
Total citations:
101
Citations from 2024:
12
(11.88%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Sindiani A. M. et al. Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan // Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020. Vol. 59. pp. 186-194.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Sindiani A. M., Obeidat N., Alshdaifat E., Elsalem L., Alwani M., Rawashdeh H., Fares A. S., Alalawne T., Tawalbeh L. Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan // Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020. Vol. 59. pp. 186-194.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.036
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.036
TI - Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan
T2 - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
AU - Sindiani, Amer Mahmoud
AU - Obeidat, Nail
AU - Alshdaifat, Eman
AU - Elsalem, Lina
AU - Alwani, Mustafa
AU - Rawashdeh, H.
AU - Fares, Ahmad S
AU - Alalawne, Tamara
AU - Tawalbeh, Loai
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/11/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 186-194
VL - 59
PMID - 33042535
SN - 2049-0801
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2020_Sindiani,
author = {Amer Mahmoud Sindiani and Nail Obeidat and Eman Alshdaifat and Lina Elsalem and Mustafa Alwani and H. Rawashdeh and Ahmad S Fares and Tamara Alalawne and Loai Tawalbeh},
title = {Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan},
journal = {Annals of Medicine and Surgery},
year = {2020},
volume = {59},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.036},
pages = {186--194},
doi = {10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.036}
}