Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
2.1
SJR
0.569
CiteScore
4.1
Categories
Pharmacology (medical)
Pharmacology
Areas
Medicine
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Years of issue
1976-2022, 2024-2025
journal names
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
J CLIN PHARM THER
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
(1027 citations)

PLoS ONE
(599 citations)

Frontiers in Pharmacology
(549 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Peking University
(40 publications)

Temple University
(39 publications)

Capital Medical University
(36 publications)

Capital Medical University
(32 publications)

Nanjing Medical University
(23 publications)

Fudan University
(19 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 458
Q2

Automated Monitoring of Web User Interfaces
Visconti E., Tsigkanos C., Nenzi L.
Application development for the modern Web involves sophisticated engineering workflows – including user interface (UI) aspects. Such user interfaces comprise Web elements that are typically created with HTML/CSS markup and JavaScript-like languages, yielding Web documents. Their testing entails performing checks to examine visual and structural parts of the resulting UI software against requirements such as usability, accessibility, performance, or, increasingly, compliance with standards. However, current techniques are largely ad-hoc and tailor-made to specific classes of requirements or Web technologies and extensively require human-in-the-loop qualitative evaluations. Web UI evaluation so far has lacked formal foundations, which would provide assurances of compliance with requirements in an automatic manner.
To this end,
we devise a methodology and accompanying technical framework for web UIs. In our approach, requirements are formally specified in a spatio-temporal logic able to capture both the layout of visual components as well as how they change over time, as a user interacts with them. The technique we advocate is independent of the underlying technologies a Web application may be developed with, as well as the browser and operating system used.
To concretely support the specification and evaluation of UI requirements, our framework is grounded on open-source tools for instrumenting, analyzing, and reporting spatio-temporal behaviors in webpages. We demonstrate our approach in practice over
Web accessibility standards posing challenges for automated verification.
Q2

Trust Models Go to the Web: Learning How to Trust Strangers
De Meo P., Prifti Y., Provetti A.
We study emerging traits of interpersonal and social trust in online social networks of needs (OSNNs), where trust interactions start online and evolve into in-person meetings. We present a lightweight web scraping solution to harness data from online social networks; thanks to it we were able to monitor a nation-wide portal for childcare and see the evolution of online reviews from both families and carers. We analysed the data by first considering topological information to test centrality metrics as proxies for trustworthiness. Next, we focused on features/profile analysis and tested the Castelfranchi–Falcone trust model from psychology (CF-T), fitting it to online reviews of childcare services. Even though such reviews are relatively scarce and seemingly skewed, we feature-engineered the CF-T model to predict the evolution of reviews, treated as proxies for trust. By aggregating CF-T scores at the regional level, we discovered a strong correlation with per capita GDP, which suggests that high levels of trust in social networks of needs reflect social capital.
Q2

What Did My Users Experience? Discovering Visual Stimuli on Graphical User Interfaces of the Web
Menges R., Staab S., Schaefer C., Walber T., Kumar C.
Main tasks of usability experts for Web sites comprise the analysis of user interaction behavior on graphical user interfaces, the discovery of issues, and the derivation of improvements to the interface. The analysis of user interaction behavior and corresponding discovery of issues are made difficult by modern Web interfaces that incorporate dynamic interface elements and that orchestrate complex reactions to user responses. We propose a semi-automated approach for discovering visual stimuli, which capture summarized views of the interface as encountered by users during interaction. Discovered visual stimuli allow for meaningful aggregations of user interactions based on what users encountered on the interface such that the analysis by usability experts can relate the interface views with user interactions correctly and identify arising issues. We provide WebVSD as an implementation of the approach and perform a set of evaluations with real-world Web sites that show the accuracy of proposed methods in isolation and in the tool chain, as well as case studies and a survey of usability experts indicating the usefulness of the suggested approach.
Q2

BNoteToDanmu: Category-Guided Note-to-Danmu Conversion Method for Learning on Video Sharing Platforms
Yu F., Zhang P., Qiao S., Ding X., Lu T., Gu N.
Danmu (or “bullet screen”), a popular feature on video sharing platforms, plays a crucial role in facilitating knowledge sharing and learning. In recent years, danmu has drawn attention to automatic generation methods. However, existing methods mostly utilize limited content sources, such as the video itself (e.g., subtitles) and neighboring danmus, while other valuable sources remain underexplored. To this end, this paper proposes a Category-Guided Note-to-Danmu conversion model (CG-NTD) by leveraging user-generated notes. The model is designed to identify unique contents within the notes and convert them into danmus, while also showing the source note categories. CG-NTD classifies the notes by fusing them with subtitle and neighboring danmu features. Then, it uses a cross-attention mechanism to integrate the note’s category feature with note, subtitle, and danmu contexts, to identify three keywords from the notes as the generated danmus. Using Bilibili as the research site, we implement a plugin prototype named BNoteToDanmu. Automatic and human evaluations reveal that CG-NTD outperforms BiLSTM, mT5, and BERT baselines in Precision, Recall, and F1-score metrics, and generates more understandable and relevant danmus than ChatGPT. Moreover, the plugin demonstrates promising applications, such as assisting users in viewing videos, posting danmus, and recognizing high-quality notes. These findings offer insights into leveraging user creations to generate danmu to enhance its learning value on video sharing platforms.
Q2

Towards Effective Time-Aware Language Representation: Exploring Enhanced Temporal Understanding in Language Models
Wang J., Jatowt A., Cai Y.
In the evolving field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), understanding the temporal context of text is increasingly critical for applications requiring advanced temporal reasoning. Traditional pre-trained language models like BERT, which rely on synchronic document collections such as BookCorpus and Wikipedia, often fall short in effectively capturing and leveraging temporal information. To address this limitation, we introduce BiTimeBERT 2.0, a novel time-aware language model pre-trained on a temporal news article collection. BiTimeBERT 2.0 incorporates temporal information through three innovative pre-training objectives: Extended Time-Aware Masked Language Modeling (ETAMLM), Document Dating (DD), and Time-Sensitive Entity Replacement (TSER). Each objective is specifically designed to target a distinct dimension of temporal information: ETAMLM enhances the model’s understanding of temporal contexts and relations, DD integrates document timestamps as explicit chronological markers, and TSER focuses on the temporal dynamics of ”Person” entities. Moreover, our refined corpus preprocessing strategy reduces training time by nearly 53%, making BiTimeBERT 2.0 significantly more efficient while maintaining high performance. Experimental results show that BiTimeBERT 2.0 achieves substantial improvements across a broad range of time-related tasks and excels on datasets spanning extensive temporal ranges. These findings underscore BiTimeBERT 2.0’s potential as a powerful tool for advancing temporal reasoning in NLP.
Q2

Exploring Suicide Factors in Online Discourse: Sentiment and Thematic Analysis of Reddit
Dan E., Zhu J., Jin R.
Suicide remains a critical global health issue, with rising numbers claiming more lives each year despite ongoing prevention efforts. Current research has extensively explored factors influencing suicidal tendencies, emphasizing trauma, mental health disorders, and social relationships. However, traditional studies often relied on traditional data sources and often examined risk factors in isolation, which may not fully capture the dynamics observed in social media platforms. To address these limitations, our study utilizes data from r/SuicideWatch and r/Teenagers to analyze the emotional sentiment and explore themes associated with suicidal ideation, with r/Teenagers serving as a comparative reference. By leveraging natural language processing (NLP) techniques and statistical methodologies, including sentiment analysis and BERTopic modeling, we aim to gain deeper insights into the factors contributing to suicidal thoughts. Using TextBlob, our findings reveal a significant difference in sentiment between the two subreddits, with r/SuicideWatch posts predominantly expressing challenges and distressing emotions. Through BERTopic analysis, we identified key themes such as emotional challenges related to romantic relationships, academic pressure, and substance use concerns in r/SuicideWatch, highlighting their strong association with suicidal ideation. While r/Teenagers had some similar themes regarding struggles with loneliness and academics, the topics were focused more on general adolescent concerns. These findings demonstrate that advanced NLP methods can effectively analyze large-scale social media data, providing valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of suicidal ideation and emphasizing the need for targeted intervention strategies. Suggested improvements include enhancing relationship counseling and peer support networks, implementing school-based mental health programs, and leveraging social media for real-time support and awareness campaigns. By understanding the emotional and thematic nuances of online discussions, these strategies can more effectively address the multifaceted factors contributing to mental health challenges and reduce the risk of suicidal behavior.
Q2

CoDÆN: Benchmarks and Comparison of Evolutionary Community Detection Algorithms for Dynamic Networks
Paoletti G., Gioacchini L., Mellia M., Vassio L., Almeida J.
Web data are often modelled as complex networks in which entities interact and form communities. Nevertheless, web data evolves over time, and network communities change alongside it. This makes Community Detection (CD) in dynamic graphs a relevant problem, calling for
evolutionary
CD algorithms. The choice and evaluation of such algorithm performance is challenging because of the lack of a comprehensive set of benchmarks and specific metrics. To address these challenges, we propose CoDÆN – COmmunity Detection Algorithms in Evolving Networks – a benchmarking framework for evolutionary CD algorithms in dynamic networks, that we offer as open source to the community. CoDÆN allows us to generate synthetic community-structured graphs with known ground truth and design evolving scenarios combining nine basic graph transformations that modify edges, nodes, and communities. We propose three complementary metrics (i.e. Correctness, Delay, and Stability) to compare evolutionary CD algorithms.
Armed with CoDÆN, we consider three evolutionary modularity-based CD approaches, dissecting their performance to gauge the trade-off between the stability of the communities and their correctness. Next, we compare the algorithms in real Web-oriented datasets, confirming such a trade-off. Our findings reveal that algorithms that introduce memory in the graph maximise stability but add delay when abrupt changes occur. Conversely, algorithms that introduce memory by initialising the CD algorithms with the previous solution fail to identify the split and birth of new communities. These observations underscore the value of CoDÆN in facilitating the study and comparison of alternative evolutionary community detection algorithms.
Q2

PORTRAIT: A Hybrid Approach to Create Extractive Ground-truth Summary for Disaster Event
Garg P., Chakraborty R., Dandapat S.
Nowadays, X (formerly known as Twitter) is an important source of information and latest updates during ongoing events, such as disaster events. However, the huge number of tweets posted during a disaster makes identification of relevant information highly challenging. Therefore, a summary of the tweets can help the decision-makers to ensure efficient allocation of resources among the affected population. There exist several automated summarization approaches that can generate a summary given the tweets related to a disaster. Development of these automated summarization approaches require availability of ground-truth summary of the dataset for verification. However, the number of publicly available datasets along with the ground-truth summary for disaster events are still inadequate. To improve this situation, we need to create more ground-truth summaries. Existing approaches for ground-truth summary generation rely on the annotators’ wisdom and intuition. This process requires immense human effort and significant time. Moreover, the selection of the important tweets from the humongous set of input tweets often results in sub-optimal choice of tweets in the final summary. Therefore, to handle these challenges, we propose a hybrid approach (PORTRAIT) for ground-truth summary generation, where we partly automate the procedure to improve the quality of ground-truth summary and reduce human effort and time. We validate the effectiveness of PORTRAIT on nine disaster events through quantitative and qualitative analysis. We prepare and release the ground-truth summaries for nine disaster events, which consist of both natural and man-made disaster events belonging to five different continents.
Q2

“Double vaccinated, 5G boosted!”: Learning Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Vaccination from Social Media
Chen N., Chen X., Zhong Z., Pang J.
The sudden onset of the recently concluded COVID-19 pandemic has driven substantial progress in various scientific fields. One notable example is the comprehension of public vaccination attitudes and the timely monitoring of their fluctuations through social media platforms. This approach can serve as a cost-effective means to supplement surveys in gathering public vaccine hesitancy levels. In this paper, we propose a deep-learning framework leveraging textual posts on social media to extract and track users’ vaccination stances in near real-time. Compared to previous works, we integrate into the framework the recent posts of a user’s social network friends to collaboratively detect the user’s genuine attitude towards vaccination. Based on our annotated dataset from X (previously known as Twitter), the models instantiated from our framework can increase the performance of attitude extraction by up to 23% compared to the state-of-the-art text-only models. Using this framework, we successfully confirm the feasibility of using social media to track the evolution of vaccination attitudes in real life. In addition, we illustrate the generality of our framework in extracting other public opinions such as political ideology. We further show one practical use of our framework by validating the possibility of forecasting a user’s vaccine hesitancy changes with information perceived from social media.
Q2

MSA-Net: A Multi-Scale Information Diffusion Model Awaring User Activity Level
Tang Y., Piao J., Wang H., Wang Y., Li Y.
Modeling information diffusion on social networks can be used to guide the prediction and control of information propagation and improve the structure and functionality of social networks. Existing information diffusion prediction methods can predict information diffusion paths and its volume by modeling social network structure and user behavior. However, none of the existing methods take user activity level, which is proved to be critical in modeling the information diffusion process, into account, thus weaken the prediction accuracy. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a Multi-Scale Activity Network (MSA-Net) to capture topological and historical affect features for different scales and to predict the users who will be affected at a specific future timestamp with the help of user activity level. Specifically, we first learn the network representation of three scales or levels: micro-scale, meso-scale, and macro-scale, which refers to the user level, intra-community level, and inter-community level, respectively. Then, we introduce the user activity level for each user by using user degree and average number of tweets per time unit to model the individual differences of users to achieve a more accurate prediction. Extensive experiments based on real-world datasets show that MSA-Net achieves a 6.14% improvement in terms of precision, a 6.74% improvement in terms of recall metrics, a 4.26% improvement in terms of F1-score, a 3.15% improvement in terms of MAP, and a 25.78% improvement in terms of NRMSE over the best existing baseline. The code and data are available at https://github.com/tsinghua-fib-lab/MSA-Net.
Q2

Twitter User Geolocation Based on Location Feature Enhancement
Zhang M., Luo X., Huang N., Liu Y., Du S.
User location discovery from social media is crucial for location-based services like emergency awareness and event monitoring. Existing approaches generally integrate user-generated text features and social relationships, but insufficiently explore location-specific features and geographically proximate relationships, leading to suboptimal accuracy. In this paper, we propose a Twitter user geolocation method based on location feature enhancement, to better capture the location characteristics in users’ tweets and social relationships. Specifically, a user tweet representation algorithm based on location feature separation (TwLS) is designed. By leveraging words’ location-aware weight matrix and pre-trained embeddings, TwLS calculates a tweet representation for each user in every location, explicitly indicating the relevance between users and various locations. Additionally, we develop the local celebrity discovery method (LocCel) to construct social networks by identifying and preserving geographically concentrated high-degree nodes while filtering noise. Thereby LocCel enhances local relationships and strengthens location-proximate connections within the user social network. Experiments on two real-world datasets show that our method outperforms seven baselines, improving user geolocation accuracy by 3.1% ∼ 8.1% and 1.8% ∼ 8.8%, while reducing median error by 22.2% ∼ 52.8% and 19.4% ∼ 50.7%, respectively.
Q2

Unsupervised Framing Analysis for Social Media Discourse in Polarizing Events
Sarmiento H., Córdova R., Ortiz J., Bravo-Marquez F., Santos M., Valenzuela S.
This study investigates the concept of
frames
in the realm of online polarization, with a focus on social media platforms. The research extends the understanding of how frames—emerging, complex, and often subtle concepts—become prominent in online conversations that are polarized. The study proposes a comprehensive methodology for identifying and characterizing these frames, integrating machine learning techniques, network analysis algorithms, and natural language processing tools. This method aims for generalizability across multiple platforms and types of user engagement. Two novel metrics,
homogeneity
and
relevancy
are introduced for the rigorous evaluation of identified frame candidates.
Grounded in several foundational presumptions, including the role of topics and multi-word expressions in framing, the study sheds light on how frames emerge and gain significance within digital communities. The research questions explored include the methods for identifying frames, the variability and significance of these frames, and the effectiveness of different computational techniques in this context.
To validate the approach, we present a case study of the 2021 Chilean presidential election, using data from both Twitter and WhatsApp platforms. This real-world application allows for the examination of how frames fluctuate in response to events and the specific mechanisms of platforms. Overall, the study makes several key contributions to the field, offering new insights and methodologies for analyzing the complexities of online polarization. It serves as groundwork for future research on the dynamics of online communities, especially those associated with distinctly polarized events.
Q2

From Nodes to Knowledge: Exploring Social Network Analysis in Education
Singh S.S., Muhuri S., Kumar S., Barua J.
In the evolving education landscape, this survey investigates the integration and transformation of educational paradigms using social network analysis (SNA). This article examines the fundamentals of SNA, including nodes, edges, centrality metrics, and network dynamics, for a comprehensive understanding of the education domain. It guides researchers through various applications of SNA in education, such as student–teacher networks and institutional collaborations, highlighting the advantages and challenges of these complex interactions. The article assesses the methodologies used in educational SNA, including data collection strategies and the associated ethical considerations. The survey also discusses various case studies and applications where SNA facilitates well-informed decision-making, enhanced academic collaboration, and the evaluation of student performance. This article focuses on the transformative potential of SNA and acknowledges the limitations, ethical dilemmas, and technological challenges in the field. It concludes with a forward-looking perspective on the future of SNA in education, showcasing supportive technological advancement. This survey highlights the evolution of SNA since its incorporation into educational research and practices.
Q2

Ransomware Over Modern Web Browsers: A Novel Strain and a New Defense Mechanism
Oz H., Tuncay G., Aris A., Acar A., Babun L., Uluagac S.
Ransomware is an increasingly prevalent form of malware targeting end-users, governments, and businesses. As it has evolved, adversaries added new capabilities to their arsenal. We propose a next-generation browser-based ransomware,
RøB
, which performs its malicious actions via web technologies, File System Access API (FSA) and WebAssembly (Wasm).
RøB
uses this API through the victims’ browsers; hence, it does not require the victims to download and install malicious binaries. We performed extensive evaluations with three different OSs, 23 file formats, 29 distinct directories, five cloud providers, and four antivirus solutions. Our evaluations show that
RøB
can encrypt various types of files in the local and cloud-integrated directories, external storage devices, and network-shared folders of victims. Our experiments also reveal that popular cloud solutions, Box Individual and Apple iCloud can be severely affected by
RøB
. Moreover, we conducted tests with commercial antivirus software such as AVG, Avast, Kaspersky, and Malware Bytes that perform sensitive directory and suspicious behavior monitoring against ransomware. We verified that
RøB
can evade these antivirus software and encrypt victim files. Moreover, existing ransomware detection solutions in the literature also cannot be a remedy against
RøB
due to its distinct features. Therefore, in this paper, we also propose
RøBguard
, a new detection system for
RøB
-like attacks.
RøBguard
monitors the web applications that use the FSA API via function hooking and uses a machine learning classifier to detect
RøB
-like attacks. We implemented a proof of concept version of
RøBguard
and our evaluation results show that
RøBguard
can detect
RøB
-like browser-based ransomware attacks effectively. We also provide future research directions that should be addressed in this domain.
Q2

Crumbled Cookies: Exploring E-commerce Websites? Cookie Policies with Data Protection Regulations
Singh N., Do Y., Yu Y., Fouad I., Kim J., Kim H.
Despite stringent data protection regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and other country-specific laws, numerous websites continue to use cookies to track user activities, raising significant privacy concerns. This study aims to investigate the compliance of e-commerce websites with these regulations from a cookie perspective and explore potential variations in cookie policies across different countries. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 360 popular e-commerce websites (44,323 cookies) across multiple countries, examining cookie attributes and their potential links to privacy and security breaches. Our findings revealed that 73% of third-party cookies function as tracker cookies, with around 40% breaching lifecycle regulations. Additionally, 85% are vulnerable to potential cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, while only 349 out of 44,323 adhere to robust measures aimed at combating cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. We also discovered instances of masquerading cookies, where third-party cookies disguise themselves as first-party cookies, enabling unauthorized user tracking without consent. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to comprehensively analyze the compliance of e-commerce websites with the GDPR, CCPA, and country-specific regulations concerning cookie policies across different jurisdictions. Our findings highlight the urgent need for uniform and consistent cookie policies across websites and jurisdictions, as well as robust enforcement mechanisms and increased transparency to ensure compliance with data protection regulations. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on privacy protection and underscores the importance of addressing the challenges posed by insecure cookie practices in the e-commerce sector.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
1027 citations, 1.88%
|
|
PLoS ONE
599 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
549 citations, 1.01%
|
|
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
468 citations, 0.86%
|
|
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
463 citations, 0.85%
|
|
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
436 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
317 citations, 0.58%
|
|
BMJ Open
314 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
292 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
288 citations, 0.53%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
271 citations, 0.5%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
257 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Scientific Reports
255 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
244 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
239 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
235 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
228 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Drugs and Aging
216 citations, 0.4%
|
|
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
213 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Side Effects of Drugs Annual
195 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Antibiotics
191 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
189 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Pharmaceutics
188 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Drug Safety
178 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology
175 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Pharmacogenomics
175 citations, 0.32%
|
|
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
174 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Cureus
173 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
161 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
161 citations, 0.29%
|
|
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
160 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
153 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
150 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
149 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
145 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Clinical Therapeutics
145 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Reactions Weekly
145 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
143 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
138 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Pharmacotherapy
137 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
130 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Molecules
127 citations, 0.23%
|
|
European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
126 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Current Medical Research and Opinion
119 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
111 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
109 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Nutrients
107 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Pharmacy
106 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Drugs
105 citations, 0.19%
|
|
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
105 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
102 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
101 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Pharmacy Practice
99 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Clinical Infectious Diseases
94 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Patient Education and Counseling
93 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
93 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
90 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
87 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
86 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Anesthesia and Analgesia
86 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
82 citations, 0.15%
|
|
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
81 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
81 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Pharmacy World & Science
81 citations, 0.15%
|
|
European Journal of Pharmacology
78 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
78 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Clinical Drug Investigation
77 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Phytotherapy Research
77 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
77 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
76 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Xenobiotica
76 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
74 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
73 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Geriatrics
73 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
73 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
72 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Public Health
71 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Hospital Pharmacy
70 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
69 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Therapie
66 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cancers
66 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Pharmacological Research
65 citations, 0.12%
|
|
BMC Anesthesiology
65 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Annales Pharmaceutiques Francaises
65 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Pharmacogenomics Journal
65 citations, 0.12%
|
|
JAMA network open
64 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Healthcare
63 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
62 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
61 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
61 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
59 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Pharmacogenetics and Genomics
58 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
58 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
58 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Advances in Therapy
57 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Health Policy
57 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Psychopharmacology
57 citations, 0.1%
|
|
CNS Drugs
57 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Biomedicines
57 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition
56 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
|
|
Elsevier
11201 citations, 20.52%
|
|
Springer Nature
9259 citations, 16.96%
|
|
Wiley
7652 citations, 14.02%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3328 citations, 6.1%
|
|
MDPI
2610 citations, 4.78%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2279 citations, 4.17%
|
|
SAGE
1822 citations, 3.34%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1347 citations, 2.47%
|
|
Oxford University Press
1124 citations, 2.06%
|
|
BMJ
859 citations, 1.57%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
672 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
430 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
394 citations, 0.72%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
335 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
304 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
295 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
293 citations, 0.54%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
229 citations, 0.42%
|
|
S. Karger AG
210 citations, 0.38%
|
|
209 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
189 citations, 0.35%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
172 citations, 0.32%
|
|
JMIR Publications
165 citations, 0.3%
|
|
163 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
162 citations, 0.3%
|
|
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
157 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
148 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
136 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
133 citations, 0.24%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
129 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
124 citations, 0.23%
|
|
King Saud University
101 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SciELO
101 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
90 citations, 0.16%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
88 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
74 citations, 0.14%
|
|
72 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Medknow
68 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Physiological Society
66 citations, 0.12%
|
|
66 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Emerald
59 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Canadian Pharmacists Association
55 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
53 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
48 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
47 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IntechOpen
46 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
44 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOS Press
43 citations, 0.08%
|
|
F1000 Research
43 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
41 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
41 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Royal College of General Practitioners
40 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
39 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IGI Global
39 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
37 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
37 citations, 0.07%
|
|
CMA Impact Inc.
37 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
37 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
36 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
35 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
34 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Impact Journals
33 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
33 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
32 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hans Publishers
32 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
31 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SLACK
30 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
29 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Science Alert
29 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
28 citations, 0.05%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
27 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PeerJ
26 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Pediatric Pharmacology Advocacy Group, Inc.
26 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
26 citations, 0.05%
|
|
XMLink
26 citations, 0.05%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
25 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
25 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
24 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society for Translational Oncology
24 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
24 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IMA Press, LLC
24 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Australian Society of Anaesthetists
23 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
23 citations, 0.04%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
A and V Publications
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Consultant Pharmacists
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Annual Reviews
21 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
20 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Remedium, Ltd.
20 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Forensic Toxicologists
20 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
19 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Psiquiatria
19 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOP Publishing
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Public Health Association
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
College of Psychiatric and Neurologic Pharmacists
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Hospital Medicine
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
Peking University
40 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Temple University
39 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Capital Medical University
36 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Arizona
33 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Tasmania
29 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Fudan University
27 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Nanjing Medical University
27 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
20 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Zhejiang University
20 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
16 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
16 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Sichuan University
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Catholic University of Korea
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Canberra
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Guangxi Medical University
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Akita University Hospital
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
12 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Messina
12 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Monash University
12 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Central South University
11 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Shandong First Medical University
11 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Sookmyung Womens University
11 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
11 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Tokyo
11 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Florida
11 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
10 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
10 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Seoul National University
10 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
10 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Shandong University
10 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
10 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Gifu Pharmaceutical University
10 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
9 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Milan
9 publications, 0.21%
|
|
National University of Singapore
9 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Birmingham
9 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of South Australia
9 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Ewha Womans University
9 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
9 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
9 publications, 0.21%
|
|
People's Liberation Army General Hospital and Medical School (301 Hospital)
9 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
China Pharmaceutical University
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Nanchang University
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
North Sichuan Medical University
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
China Medical University (Liaoning)
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Anhui Medical University
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Taipei Medical University
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Mahidol University
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Lanzhou University
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
National Institute of Health Sciences
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Meiji Pharmaceutical University
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Gifu University Hospital
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Kagawa University Hospital
8 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Iran University of Medical Sciences
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Qatar University
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Wuhan University
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Manchester
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Southern Medical University
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Wenzhou Medical University
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Chicago
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Michigan
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Minnesota
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Utrecht University
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Akita University
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Toronto
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
East Tennessee State University
7 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Jilin University
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Hamad Medical Corporation
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Malaya
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Jiangsu University
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Guangzhou Medical University
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Luigi Sacco Hospital
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Otago
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Charles University
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Austin Health
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Ajou University
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Nihon University
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Hanoi University of Pharmacy
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Kuopio University Hospital
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Liverpool
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Sorbonne University
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Chang Gung University
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Adelaide
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
La Trobe University
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Capital Medical University
32 publications, 4.11%
|
|
Nanjing Medical University
23 publications, 2.95%
|
|
Fudan University
19 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Peking University
18 publications, 2.31%
|
|
Zhejiang University
14 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Arizona
14 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
12 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
11 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Temple University
10 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Guangxi Medical University
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Sichuan University
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Shandong First Medical University
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Catholic University of Korea
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Nanchang University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
North Sichuan Medical University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Shandong University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Southern Medical University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Messina
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
People's Liberation Army General Hospital and Medical School (301 Hospital)
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Gifu Pharmaceutical University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Akita University Hospital
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Iran University of Medical Sciences
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Wuhan University
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Jiangsu University
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Anhui Medical University
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Tasmania
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Sookmyung Womens University
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Akita University
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Toronto
5 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Qatar University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Shanxi Medical University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Guangzhou Medical University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Harbin Medical University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Seoul National University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Wenzhou Medical University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Lanzhou University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Meiji Pharmaceutical University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Gifu University Hospital
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Gaziosmanpasa University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Hanoi University of Pharmacy
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Tongji University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Jilin University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Hamad Medical Corporation
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Arabian Gulf University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
China Pharmaceutical University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Hebei University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Jinan University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Shantou University Medical College
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Taipei Medical University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Monash University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of South Australia
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Canberra
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Korea University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Ewha Womans University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Konyang University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Kunming Medical University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Hokkaido University of Science
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Chiba University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Hyogo Medical University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Chiba University Hospital
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Oita University Hospital
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Shimane University Hospital
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Medisch Spectrum Twente
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Barcelona
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Showa University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Miyazaki Hospital
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Istanbul University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Marmara University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Health Sciences, Turkey
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Eskisehir Osmangazi University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Imam Khomeini Hospital
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
China
|
China, 520, 12.11%
China
520 publications, 12.11%
|
USA
|
USA, 357, 8.32%
USA
357 publications, 8.32%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 167, 3.89%
Japan
167 publications, 3.89%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 78, 1.82%
Australia
78 publications, 1.82%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 76, 1.77%
United Kingdom
76 publications, 1.77%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 67, 1.56%
Spain
67 publications, 1.56%
|
France
|
France, 57, 1.33%
France
57 publications, 1.33%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 57, 1.33%
Republic of Korea
57 publications, 1.33%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 47, 1.09%
Italy
47 publications, 1.09%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 43, 1%
Turkey
43 publications, 1%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 39, 0.91%
Netherlands
39 publications, 0.91%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 36, 0.84%
Brazil
36 publications, 0.84%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 36, 0.84%
Canada
36 publications, 0.84%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 34, 0.79%
Iran
34 publications, 0.79%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 32, 0.75%
Germany
32 publications, 0.75%
|
India
|
India, 24, 0.56%
India
24 publications, 0.56%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 20, 0.47%
Thailand
20 publications, 0.47%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 19, 0.44%
Poland
19 publications, 0.44%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 17, 0.4%
Malaysia
17 publications, 0.4%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 14, 0.33%
Greece
14 publications, 0.33%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 14, 0.33%
Saudi Arabia
14 publications, 0.33%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 13, 0.3%
Belgium
13 publications, 0.3%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 13, 0.3%
Switzerland
13 publications, 0.3%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 11, 0.26%
Singapore
11 publications, 0.26%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 10, 0.23%
Egypt
10 publications, 0.23%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 8, 0.19%
Qatar
8 publications, 0.19%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 8, 0.19%
Mexico
8 publications, 0.19%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 8, 0.19%
New Zealand
8 publications, 0.19%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 8, 0.19%
Serbia
8 publications, 0.19%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 8, 0.19%
Czech Republic
8 publications, 0.19%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 7, 0.16%
Vietnam
7 publications, 0.16%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 0.16%
Ireland
7 publications, 0.16%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 7, 0.16%
Nigeria
7 publications, 0.16%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 7, 0.16%
Finland
7 publications, 0.16%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 6, 0.14%
Portugal
6 publications, 0.14%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 5, 0.12%
South Africa
5 publications, 0.12%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 4, 0.09%
Norway
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 4, 0.09%
Croatia
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 4, 0.09%
Sweden
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 4, 0.09%
Ethiopia
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.07%
Austria
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 3, 0.07%
Bahrain
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.07%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.07%
Israel
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.07%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.07%
Chile
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.05%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.05%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.05%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.05%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.05%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.05%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.05%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.05%
Malta
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 2, 0.05%
Nepal
2 publications, 0.05%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.05%
UAE
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.05%
Romania
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.05%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.02%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.02%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.02%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.02%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.02%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 1, 0.02%
Moldova
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.02%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Reunion
|
Reunion, 1, 0.02%
Reunion
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.02%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.02%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Show all (38 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
China
|
China, 343, 44.03%
China
343 publications, 44.03%
|
USA
|
USA, 112, 14.38%
USA
112 publications, 14.38%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 69, 8.86%
Japan
69 publications, 8.86%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 26, 3.34%
United Kingdom
26 publications, 3.34%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 21, 2.7%
Spain
21 publications, 2.7%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 20, 2.57%
Australia
20 publications, 2.57%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 19, 2.44%
Republic of Korea
19 publications, 2.44%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 19, 2.44%
Turkey
19 publications, 2.44%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 17, 2.18%
Iran
17 publications, 2.18%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 16, 2.05%
Netherlands
16 publications, 2.05%
|
France
|
France, 15, 1.93%
France
15 publications, 1.93%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 12, 1.54%
Canada
12 publications, 1.54%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 11, 1.41%
Germany
11 publications, 1.41%
|
India
|
India, 11, 1.41%
India
11 publications, 1.41%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 10, 1.28%
Poland
10 publications, 1.28%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 9, 1.16%
Brazil
9 publications, 1.16%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 9, 1.16%
Italy
9 publications, 1.16%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 8, 1.03%
Egypt
8 publications, 1.03%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 7, 0.9%
Saudi Arabia
7 publications, 0.9%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 6, 0.77%
Belgium
6 publications, 0.77%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 5, 0.64%
Qatar
5 publications, 0.64%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.51%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.51%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.51%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.51%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 0.51%
Thailand
4 publications, 0.51%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 3, 0.39%
Bahrain
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.39%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.26%
Greece
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.26%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.26%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.26%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.26%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 2, 0.26%
Nepal
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.26%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.26%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.26%
UAE
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.26%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.26%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.26%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.13%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.13%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.13%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.13%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.13%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.13%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.13%
Norway
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.13%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.13%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.13%
Chile
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.13%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.13%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.13%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Show all (19 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
3 profile journal articles
Kokwaro Gilbert

Strathmore University
104 publications,
3 553 citations
h-index: 31
1 profile journal article
Raza Faisal
66 publications,
1 167 citations
h-index: 20
1 profile journal article
Chi-Ting Yang

University of Hong Kong
22 publications,
338 citations
h-index: 10
1 profile journal article
El-Jaick Kenia
24 publications,
805 citations
h-index: 11
1 profile journal article
Liu Hsiao-Sheng

National Cheng Kung University
192 publications,
9 542 citations
h-index: 52
1 profile journal article
Nishida Shohei
22 publications,
199 citations
h-index: 7