Preliminary investigations of spider silk in wounds in vivo — Implications for an innovative wound dressing
C. Liebsch
1
,
V. Bucan
1
,
Bjoern Menger
1
,
Franziska Köhne
1
,
Karl-Heinz Waldmann
2
,
Desiree Vaslaitis
1
,
Peter M. Vogt
1
,
Sarah Strauss
1
,
Joern W. Kuhbier
1
1
Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical School Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2018-11-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 0.764
CiteScore: 4.7
Impact factor: 2.9
ISSN: 03054179, 18791409
PubMed ID:
30057335
General Medicine
Surgery
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Emergency Medicine
Abstract
The ideal wound dressing in particular for burn wounds has not been found yet. The aim of this study was to investigate native spider silk as a novel wound dressing. Release of inflammatory cytokines of macrophages and neutrophile granulocytes was determined via ELISA after exposure to spider silk. Migration of dermal cells as well as angiogenesis on spider silk was visualized with live video microscopy or chorioallantois membrane model, respectively. Native spider silk was placed in full-thickness skin wounds in a sheep in vivo-model and wounds were evaluated after 2, 4, 6, and 8weeks histologically as well as per quantitative real-time PCR. Minimal inflammatory cytokine release could be seen for spider silk. Ingrowth of single capillaries into bundles of spider silk and migration of keratinocytes as well as fibroblasts on spider silk fibres was proven. Macroscopically, a comparable wound closure could be seen in spider silk and in sham controls. In histological evaluation, a thicker epidermis was observed in spider silk treated wounds while collagen III/I expression ratio was comparable in both groups. As native spider silk has been described as highly biocompatible, it might represent an innovative alternative to common wound dressings.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering
3 publications, 10.71%
|
|
|
Journal of Biomaterials Applications
2 publications, 7.14%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
2 publications, 7.14%
|
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
2 publications, 7.14%
|
|
|
Protein and Peptide Letters
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Biology
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Development Genes and Evolution
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Biomaterials Advances
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Acta Biomaterialia
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Drug Development Research
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Biomacromolecules
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
ACS Nano
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
World Journal of Urology
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Morphology
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Tissue and Cell
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
|
Elsevier
8 publications, 28.57%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 publications, 17.86%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 10.71%
|
|
|
SAGE
2 publications, 7.14%
|
|
|
MDPI
2 publications, 7.14%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 7.14%
|
|
|
Wiley
2 publications, 7.14%
|
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 3.57%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
28
Total citations:
28
Citations from 2024:
10
(35.72%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Liebsch C. et al. Preliminary investigations of spider silk in wounds in vivo — Implications for an innovative wound dressing // Burns. 2018. Vol. 44. No. 7. pp. 1829-1838.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Liebsch C., Bucan V., Menger B., Köhne F., Waldmann K., Vaslaitis D., Vogt P. M., Strauss S., Kuhbier J. W. Preliminary investigations of spider silk in wounds in vivo — Implications for an innovative wound dressing // Burns. 2018. Vol. 44. No. 7. pp. 1829-1838.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.016
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.016
TI - Preliminary investigations of spider silk in wounds in vivo — Implications for an innovative wound dressing
T2 - Burns
AU - Liebsch, C.
AU - Bucan, V.
AU - Menger, Bjoern
AU - Köhne, Franziska
AU - Waldmann, Karl-Heinz
AU - Vaslaitis, Desiree
AU - Vogt, Peter M.
AU - Strauss, Sarah
AU - Kuhbier, Joern W.
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/11/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 1829-1838
IS - 7
VL - 44
PMID - 30057335
SN - 0305-4179
SN - 1879-1409
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2018_Liebsch,
author = {C. Liebsch and V. Bucan and Bjoern Menger and Franziska Köhne and Karl-Heinz Waldmann and Desiree Vaslaitis and Peter M. Vogt and Sarah Strauss and Joern W. Kuhbier},
title = {Preliminary investigations of spider silk in wounds in vivo — Implications for an innovative wound dressing},
journal = {Burns},
year = {2018},
volume = {44},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.016},
number = {7},
pages = {1829--1838},
doi = {10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.016}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Liebsch, C., et al. “Preliminary investigations of spider silk in wounds in vivo — Implications for an innovative wound dressing.” Burns, vol. 44, no. 7, Nov. 2018, pp. 1829-1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.016.