volume 26 issue 4 pages 584-592000000

Labeling Strategies Matter for Super-Resolution Microscopy: A Comparison between HaloTags and SNAP-tags

Roman S Erdmann 1
Stephanie Wood Baguley 2
Jennifer H. Richens 3
Rebecca F Wissner 1
Zhiqun Xi 2
Edward S. Allgeyer 3
Sheng Zhong 2
Alexander D Thompson 1
NICHOLAS LOWE 3
Richard Butler 3
Jan P. Bewersdorf 4
James E. Rothman 2
Daniel St. Johnston 3
Derek K. Toomre 2
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-04-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR2.659
CiteScore12.6
Impact factor7.2
ISSN24519448, 24519456
Drug Discovery
Biochemistry
Molecular Biology
Pharmacology
Clinical Biochemistry
Molecular Medicine
Abstract
Super-resolution microscopy requires that subcellular structures are labeled with bright and photostable fluorophores, especially for live-cell imaging. Organic fluorophores may help here as they can yield more photons-by orders of magnitude-than fluorescent proteins. To achieve molecular specificity with organic fluorophores in live cells, self-labeling proteins are often used, with HaloTags and SNAP-tags being the most common. However, how these two different tagging systems compare with each other is unclear, especially for stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, which is limited to a small repertoire of fluorophores in living cells. Herein, we compare the two labeling approaches in confocal and STED imaging using various proteins and two model systems. Strikingly, we find that the fluorescent signal can be up to 9-fold higher with HaloTags than with SNAP-tags when using far-red rhodamine derivatives. This result demonstrates that the labeling strategy matters and can greatly influence the duration of super-resolution imaging.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Nature Methods
5 publications, 3.6%
Angewandte Chemie
4 publications, 2.88%
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
4 publications, 2.88%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
3 publications, 2.16%
Nature Communications
3 publications, 2.16%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
3 publications, 2.16%
Nature Protocols
3 publications, 2.16%
Nature Chemical Biology
3 publications, 2.16%
Biophysical Journal
3 publications, 2.16%
ChemBioChem
3 publications, 2.16%
bioRxiv
3 publications, 2.16%
Journal of Cell Science
2 publications, 1.44%
F1000Research
2 publications, 1.44%
Viruses
2 publications, 1.44%
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
2 publications, 1.44%
STAR Protocols
2 publications, 1.44%
Journal of Biological Chemistry
2 publications, 1.44%
Microscopy Research and Technique
2 publications, 1.44%
Analysis & Sensing
2 publications, 1.44%
ACS Central Science
2 publications, 1.44%
JACS Au
2 publications, 1.44%
Chemical Science
2 publications, 1.44%
Methods in Molecular Biology
2 publications, 1.44%
Molecular Biology of the Cell
2 publications, 1.44%
Bioconjugate Chemistry
2 publications, 1.44%
ACS Chemical Biology
2 publications, 1.44%
Nature Reviews Methods Primers
2 publications, 1.44%
eLife
2 publications, 1.44%
Molecules
1 publication, 0.72%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Springer Nature
24 publications, 17.27%
Elsevier
24 publications, 17.27%
Wiley
20 publications, 14.39%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
20 publications, 14.39%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
17 publications, 12.23%
MDPI
8 publications, 5.76%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
4 publications, 2.88%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 2.16%
The Company of Biologists
2 publications, 1.44%
F1000 Research
2 publications, 1.44%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 1.44%
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
2 publications, 1.44%
eLife Sciences Publications
2 publications, 1.44%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.72%
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
1 publication, 0.72%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.72%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 0.72%
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 0.72%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 0.72%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 0.72%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
139
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Erdmann R. S. et al. Labeling Strategies Matter for Super-Resolution Microscopy: A Comparison between HaloTags and SNAP-tags // Cell Chemical Biology. 2019. Vol. 26. No. 4. pp. 584-592000000.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Erdmann R. S., Baguley S. W., Richens J. H., Wissner R. F., Xi Z., Allgeyer E. S., Zhong S., Thompson A. D., LOWE N., Butler R., Bewersdorf J. P., Rothman J. E., St. Johnston D., Schepartz A., Toomre D. K. Labeling Strategies Matter for Super-Resolution Microscopy: A Comparison between HaloTags and SNAP-tags // Cell Chemical Biology. 2019. Vol. 26. No. 4. pp. 584-592000000.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.01.003
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.01.003
TI - Labeling Strategies Matter for Super-Resolution Microscopy: A Comparison between HaloTags and SNAP-tags
T2 - Cell Chemical Biology
AU - Erdmann, Roman S
AU - Baguley, Stephanie Wood
AU - Richens, Jennifer H.
AU - Wissner, Rebecca F
AU - Xi, Zhiqun
AU - Allgeyer, Edward S.
AU - Zhong, Sheng
AU - Thompson, Alexander D
AU - LOWE, NICHOLAS
AU - Butler, Richard
AU - Bewersdorf, Jan P.
AU - Rothman, James E.
AU - St. Johnston, Daniel
AU - Schepartz, Alanna
AU - Toomre, Derek K.
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/04/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 584-592000000
IS - 4
VL - 26
PMID - 30745239
SN - 2451-9448
SN - 2451-9456
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2019_Erdmann,
author = {Roman S Erdmann and Stephanie Wood Baguley and Jennifer H. Richens and Rebecca F Wissner and Zhiqun Xi and Edward S. Allgeyer and Sheng Zhong and Alexander D Thompson and NICHOLAS LOWE and Richard Butler and Jan P. Bewersdorf and James E. Rothman and Daniel St. Johnston and Alanna Schepartz and Derek K. Toomre},
title = {Labeling Strategies Matter for Super-Resolution Microscopy: A Comparison between HaloTags and SNAP-tags},
journal = {Cell Chemical Biology},
year = {2019},
volume = {26},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.01.003},
number = {4},
pages = {584--592000000},
doi = {10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.01.003}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Erdmann, Roman S., et al. “Labeling Strategies Matter for Super-Resolution Microscopy: A Comparison between HaloTags and SNAP-tags.” Cell Chemical Biology, vol. 26, no. 4, Apr. 2019, pp. 584-592000000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.01.003.